ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 September 2008, 09:46 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Youssef
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Watch: Milgauss Z-Blue
Posts: 925
|
Confusion about bracelets
I'm a little confused about hollow vs solid end and center links. Could someone please clarify what it means to me?
What does the 16610 Sub have? What about the GMT-Master II C?
__________________
Rolex GMT-Master II 116700 Rolex Explorer 214270 Rolex Milgauss 116400GV Z-Blue IWC Portuguese Hand Wound IW5454-08 Panerai Radiomir PAM183 |
16 September 2008, 10:05 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
|
well both the submariner and the GMT IIc have solid end links now. The link that joins the case- is solidly attached. Previously they used to to folded around the spring bar pin. here are the only pictures i have.
The first one is a solid end link, the second picture is hollow and the 3rd picture is a comparison with the solid end link on the top
__________________
"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795 |
16 September 2008, 10:08 PM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 288
|
Quote:
Vintage Rolex shared a hollow (aka folded) bracelets with Tudor. Mine broke and I didn't know it was something valuable to keep until recently , but the centre of the links were hollow because the steel was folded around, hence, it was lighter than the solid bracelets used on current Rolexes. You can see from the sides of both new bracelets are solid - i.e., there is no gap. |
|
17 September 2008, 12:42 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,213
|
__________________
the hype is true. a crown for every achievement. visit my audio and watch blog & how to use the rolex comfort link? |
17 September 2008, 01:14 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 448
|
I have to admit that while I was getting my GMT IIc written up at the AD, I took the liberty of trying on an SS/Plat Yachty. This watch has always caught my attention and it is asthetically perfect. But when I compared the clasp from the Yachty to my new GMT IIc, it was noticably inferior. Almost too light and fragile. Now I will only consider the Yachty if they updated the clasp.
I.V. |
17 September 2008, 01:18 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Youssef
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Watch: Milgauss Z-Blue
Posts: 925
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex GMT-Master II 116700 Rolex Explorer 214270 Rolex Milgauss 116400GV Z-Blue IWC Portuguese Hand Wound IW5454-08 Panerai Radiomir PAM183 |
|
17 September 2008, 01:22 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 448
|
GMTIIc has solid polished links.
|
17 September 2008, 01:25 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Youssef
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Watch: Milgauss Z-Blue
Posts: 925
|
One more reason for me to want the GMTIIC then! It'll be heavier, and rattle less!
__________________
Rolex GMT-Master II 116700 Rolex Explorer 214270 Rolex Milgauss 116400GV Z-Blue IWC Portuguese Hand Wound IW5454-08 Panerai Radiomir PAM183 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.