The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 March 2017, 08:26 AM   #1
uzona
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: AZ
Watch: DJ41s blk and whit
Posts: 56
Small scratches on pam 510 polished stainless

Anyone have any news on how well Cape Cod polishing cloths work on small polished stainless steel scratches/swirls?

Any alternative?
uzona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 08:34 AM   #2
Quailhunter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
I mostly read the Rolex posts. I've read both positive and negative comments on the Cape Cod cloths. I believe most were negative regarding removing scratches. Suggest searching on the forum.
Quailhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 11:01 AM   #3
K3vin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: norcal
Posts: 151
I have the same watch and cloths. In ambient light, the cloths could help with medium to heavy swirl... In bright light (full sunlight, white indoor lights, etc) however, expect the cloths (or any similarly abrasive equivalents) to greatly increase the amount of fine swirl.

Your best bet is to just send it back to Panerai for a real polish.
K3vin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 04:14 PM   #4
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,297
Personally, and unlike many other brands, Rolex included, I find Panerais look better with some marks and scratches.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 04:30 PM   #5
Quailhunter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
I have reluctantly come to the point that fine scratches of polished metal are fated to occur. Other than professional polishing, the scratches are there to not only stay but multiply. A skilled polisher can make the watch look pristine. Too much polishing or a bad polisher can ruin a watch. Polishing does not seem to be a home project.
Quailhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 06:23 PM   #6
Ruud Van Driver
"TRF" Member
 
Ruud Van Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,926
If I can't feel it with my finger nail, I try not to worry about it.
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737

"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott
Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Ruud Van Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 09:28 PM   #7
uzona
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: AZ
Watch: DJ41s blk and whit
Posts: 56
Its kinda weird because I have several Omega and Zenith pieces that have quite a bit of polished stainless on them. They have ALOT less scratches/swirls then this Pan. over a much longer period of time.

This was my first Pan and wonder if their ss could be "softer"?
uzona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:10 PM   #8
Sublovin
2024 Pledge Member
 
Sublovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 4,595
Cape cod works well, but the small swirls will reappear in no time. Also, keep in mind, every time you polish you remove a small amount of the metal
Sublovin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2017, 12:24 AM   #9
fullcourt
"TRF" Member
 
fullcourt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: dp
Location: chicago, usa
Watch: panerai
Posts: 2,369
cape cod works well, scratches add character. ymmv

have a great day
__________________
dp
just living the dream
chicago, usa

chgo_risti on IG
fullcourt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2017, 05:34 AM   #10
stockae92
2024 Pledge Member
 
stockae92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
Personally, and unlike many other brands, Rolex included, I find Panerais look better with some marks and scratches.
I concur

Except I think Rolex looks good with some marks and scratches as well.

Oh hey, I even think my "beater" X33 looks good with dings, and scratches. :)

__________________
135
├┼┼╕
246 R
stockae92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2017, 06:37 AM   #11
Magwitch
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: .
Posts: 668
I've had good luck with the CC cloths. If they leave little swirlies they're darn hard to see. And metal removal is absolute minimal. We're not talking about rouge and a buffing wheel.
Magwitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2017, 01:34 PM   #12
Urosfan
"TRF" Member
 
Urosfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
Scratches don't bother me anymore , It's gonna happen either way with pams wear it it and enjoy
Urosfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2017, 06:28 AM   #13
gav329
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Scotland
Posts: 355
Fine scratches on the surface are just part of owning a stainless steel watch don't worry about it if you do you'll not enjoy your pride and joy. Best wishes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
gav329 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.