ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 October 2008, 07:27 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
Tudor vs Omega
Hi all
I've been asked by a friend which is the better buy? Omega Seamaster or Tudor Sub? I thought I'd throw it open to the experts. As far as I know the movement in both is the ETA. I understand Omega now owns ETA outright, is this correct...? I also advised that Tudor will have the quick date change unlike the Omega. Thanks in advance Tony
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
7 October 2008, 07:36 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Christopher
Location: fort lauderdale
Watch: Bunches
Posts: 1,860
|
Both excelent pieces i
I would go with which ever sings to him more... Dose he have acess to both watches? If so have him try them both on and hell know which one. Personaly i love the history in Omega... I recently fliped a Tudor that i had, to fund my new to me Omega... Again both excelent choices both will hold there value well but at the end of the day I always know which one i want once it,s on my wrist... Just my .02 |
7 October 2008, 07:44 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
Quote:
Hi Christopher In the UK, Tudor's used to be available, but now not so. He's seen a Tudor Sub with a black ceramic bezel at a grey dealer, but I can't find the model anywhere.
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
|
7 October 2008, 08:07 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
|
You posted on the wrong board I think and the mods will probably move the thread, but here's some info:
I think most Seamasters have a quick change date. Here's some data by model. I'm not sure about the new black SmPs. I suspect they are rapid change. http://www.chronocentric.com/omega/s...shtml#features
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter |
7 October 2008, 08:35 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: steven
Location: tampa bay
Watch: 1680 18k sub
Posts: 6,672
|
tudors are by far the better buy!!
|
7 October 2008, 08:38 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Buz
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam
Posts: 5,108
|
Rumor has it that Rolex has purchased Sellita and will use their movements in the Tudor line. Anyone else heard this, or can verify or dispel?
__________________
Buz The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis |
7 October 2008, 09:41 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 605
|
Quote:
I think tudor would offer better and more cost effective servicing to the watch as well ..... |
|
7 October 2008, 09:47 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Richard
Location: USA
Watch: YM Deep Space
Posts: 12,521
|
Go with the Tudor!
__________________
Rolex Yacht-Master 40mm (SS-YG / Deep Space MOP) 16623 Breitling Aerospace Titanium / 18K with UTC. Omega Speedmaster 3510.50 Oris TT1 Pro Diver Regulator 43MM |
7 October 2008, 09:50 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
I have never owned a Tudor but I used to own a Seamaster and it was a very nice watch, I would recommend the Omega. Omega makes a solid watch and he can find very nice discounts on them brand new.
__________________
My grails: |
7 October 2008, 10:14 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: James Bond
Location: USA
Posts: 457
|
Get the Omega. They are excellent watches!
|
7 October 2008, 10:35 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Craig
Location: NW Georgia
Watch: Blue Sub+Tud Chron
Posts: 834
|
I like the Tudor better than the Seamaster! Of course, I'm biased because I have a Big Block Tudor Chronograph. Tudors are great watches! Setting the time and date on my Tudor is the same as any Rolex with the date. First notch winds the watch, 2nd sets the date, and the third sets the time. (If you think of the fully screwed down position as the 0th notch...) I guess the Tudor Sub works in a similar manner.
|
7 October 2008, 12:13 PM | #12 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,199
|
Quote:
Quote:
Here's a full list: Swatch Group Brands: Breguet, Blancpain, Glashütte Original, Jaquet Droz, Léon Hatot, Omega, Tiffany & Co., Longines, Rado, Union Glashütte, Tissot, ck watch & jewelry, Balmain, Certina, Mido, Hamilton, Swatch, Flik Flak, Endura and Tourbillon. Swatch Group Production Companies: DYB, ETA, Frédéric Piguet, Valdar, Nivarox-FAR, Comadur, Rubattel et Weyermann, MOM Le Prélet, Deutsche Zifferblatt Manufaktur, Universo, Favre et Perret, Manufacture Ruedin, Lascor, Meco, Swatch Group Assembly, EM Microelectronic, Lasag, Sokymat Automotive, Renata, Microcomponents, Michel Präzisionstechnik, Micro Crystal, Oscilloquartz and Swiss Timing. |
||
7 October 2008, 02:30 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 142
|
I would either go with tudor or go with any number of other companies that offer an ETA movement in a nice diver case at half or more less than a discounted omega.
Omega with the exception of original speedmasters does not do much for me. Their seamaster with the exception of the planet has a bezel that is almost impossibe to turn or grip dry, let alone wet. |
7 October 2008, 04:00 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
I believe that the latest Seamasters are all equipped with Omega's new Coaxial movement, which although built on an ETA base, is modified in such a way as to require much less maintenance and thus leads to longer intervals between servicings. Both of course are good watches, so he should choose on the basis of which appeals to him more.
|
7 October 2008, 04:22 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 142
|
True --- however I am not enough of a watchmaker to be able to comment on the coaxial escapement; it does seem well regarded by those in the know.
However the maintance interval thing is not something I buy into. Given that a rollie without a ball bearing rotor AND a traditional escapement can easily go 5 years, how much longer do we expect a watch to go? And how long do we expect the lube on the escapement and other parts of the watch to last? Even the best lubes break down eventually and there is friction other places aside from the escapement. So I respect and embrace the co-axial escapement bit don't believe in a free lunch, were I wearing a coaxial it would get a clean / oil every 4-5 years no matter what. |
7 October 2008, 07:27 PM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 52
|
Out of interest guys, what movement to the current Tudor's use - a Rolex movement or ETA ?
|
8 October 2008, 06:10 AM | #17 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,217
|
Quote:
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
|
8 October 2008, 06:11 AM | #18 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,217
|
Quote:
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
|
8 October 2008, 06:15 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: F
Location: Scotland
Watch: Exp II White Face
Posts: 4,272
|
As a Rolex owner I would be be inclined to go with the Omega, based purely on the different look to my existing watch.
__________________
Why have what's new when you have what's best. f |
8 October 2008, 10:15 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bahston
Posts: 127
|
You didn't say which Seamaster - it's a very broad line. The classic "Bond" and equivalent Seamasters with the cal. 1120 movement are excellent COSC timekeepers and excellent values. The Tudor is probably a lot less common, though, so if that's a factor that might be the way to go. Hard to make a bad choice between the two.
__________________
1680 Submariner ~ 5513 Submariner ~ 16710 GMT Master II ~ 145.00.22 Speedmaster Professional ~ 2531.80 Seamaster Professional ~ Marathon TSAR |
8 October 2008, 10:59 AM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Richard
Location: USA
Watch: YM Deep Space
Posts: 12,521
|
I like the Tudor due to the Rolex association.
I have an Omega and it is a wonderful timepiece. To be totally truthful, you can't go wrong with either.
__________________
Rolex Yacht-Master 40mm (SS-YG / Deep Space MOP) 16623 Breitling Aerospace Titanium / 18K with UTC. Omega Speedmaster 3510.50 Oris TT1 Pro Diver Regulator 43MM |
9 October 2008, 02:00 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
Thanks everyone
Thanks to everyone for their input & advice.
The original Tudor he was after has been sold, so he's going to hang on now until Christmas, to see what arrives in the same dealer. He reckon's he's 99% sure he'll go for the Tudor Sub unless a REALLY great deal comes up on an Omega.
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
9 October 2008, 02:00 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
Thanks everyone
Thanks to everyone for their input & advice.
The original Tudor he was after has been sold, so he's going to hang on now until Christmas, to see what arrives in the same dealer. He reckon's he's 99% sure he'll go for the Tudor Sub unless a REALLY great deal comes up on an Omega.
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
9 October 2008, 02:01 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
Thanks everyone
Thanks to everyone for their input & advice.
The original Tudor he was after has been sold, so he's going to hang on now until Christmas, to see what arrives in the same dealer. He reckon's he's 99% sure he'll go for the Tudor Sub unless a REALLY great deal comes up on an Omega.
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
9 January 2014, 01:08 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Indra
Location: Jakarta
Watch: ROLEXes, OMEGAs
Posts: 154
|
For me, Omega
|
9 January 2014, 01:15 PM | #26 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
I think he's probably pulled the trigger by now.
__________________
_______________________ |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.