ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
19 May 2017, 05:40 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: London
Watch: 1963 Gilt 5513
Posts: 53
|
1977 1675 caseback. Real or not?
Hi all,
This was removed from a 1977 Radial Dial GMT I bought a few years ago. I have now sold it but the buyer thinks it is suspect. Can anyone 100% confirm as I need to shell out for a replacement if it's fake. I'm after informed opinions please, not just a single word response. http://cargocollective.com/stevenwor...titled-project Thanks Steven |
19 May 2017, 05:44 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: London
Watch: 1963 Gilt 5513
Posts: 53
|
|
19 May 2017, 05:48 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: London
Watch: 1963 Gilt 5513
Posts: 53
|
Sorry I can't post the pic but added it online...
http://cargocollective.com/stevenwor...titled-project |
19 May 2017, 05:49 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Michael
Location: NJ
Watch: Panerai 112
Posts: 1,172
|
What is the buyer 'suspect' of? Did the buyer point out something that does not look right?
|
19 May 2017, 05:53 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: London
Watch: 1963 Gilt 5513
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
My watchmaker runs a certified Rolex Service Centre and isn't sure if it is or not. |
|
19 May 2017, 07:15 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: London
Watch: 1963 Gilt 5513
Posts: 53
|
Bump! Anyone?
|
19 May 2017, 07:54 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,643
|
Why on earth would anyone put a fake case back on a real watch? Also have to question if a cheap lousy fake case back would: a) even fit B) be stamped at all.
I say tell the guy to behave himself and leave you alone. If he is unsure he should take it to an RSC and pay for the check up. If he doesn't know what he is talking about he should seek advice before winding you up and or stay away from expensive things he knows nothing about. EDIT: I should also say it looks fine to me and note that Rolex revise fonts often, there is no rhyme nor reason, we see it all the time with variations between fonts on dials of the same reference watches etc. I guess you owned it a while. Was it water resistant? If so, very unlikely the case back was fake. |
19 May 2017, 08:20 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: London
Watch: 1963 Gilt 5513
Posts: 53
|
Thanks for your comments. It's easy-ish to find out info on dials but casebacks are harder.
When I bought the watch, I had it serviced and swapped out the caseback for a sapphire crystal caseback much to the dismay of my watchmaker! He frowns on such things. So not sure if watch was waterproof then. I took it to him the day it arrived. The caseback sat in the box all this time until I sold it two days ago. I want the buyer to be satisfied. Hopefully this will help. He is watching the thread. Cheers! Quote:
|
|
19 May 2017, 09:30 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,643
|
|
19 May 2017, 09:31 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Jason
Location: Connecticut
Watch: Tudor 7016, 94010
Posts: 256
|
Quote:
|
|
19 May 2017, 01:35 PM | #12 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Michael
Location: NJ
Watch: Panerai 112
Posts: 1,172
|
Quote:
And, if the guy is right about the case back being fake he should not "leave" anybody alone. He should have it replaced with a genuine one. Why you said it "looks fine"...what did you base that on? |
|
19 May 2017, 08:55 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: London
Watch: 1963 Gilt 5513
Posts: 53
|
|
19 May 2017, 09:35 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 792
|
Real.
|
19 May 2017, 09:44 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 885
|
Looks authentic to me as well, no worries.
|
19 May 2017, 09:57 AM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
I checked several of my case backs from 1974 through 1979 and the "1675" stamping from the linked photo is not the same as any in my photo archive. Everything else looked fine in the linked photo.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
19 May 2017, 10:31 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Darien, CT
Posts: 333
|
Caseback is fake. Font is incorrect along with a couple of other tells.
Its aftermarket. |
19 May 2017, 10:35 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Darien, CT
Posts: 333
|
Correct font for casebacks with no date..
|
19 May 2017, 09:53 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: London
Watch: 1963 Gilt 5513
Posts: 53
|
Thanks for all your comments. I have agreed to replace the caseback based on your comments.
The link to the image is no longer active as I hosted it online in my work portfolio. Cheers! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.