ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 June 2017, 01:33 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bklyn
Posts: 1,471
|
ROO - stay/go? seeking opinions
after having decided that this should leave the stable (my taste recently transitioning more towards traditionally sized watches...as well as recent addition of the Jumbo), I'm now having seller's remorse before it's even sold!
this is a model that first caught my eye from a very far distance over 10yrs ago. i still remember the guy that was in a group meeting with me, i believe it was a G series blue/grey petite tapisserie with arabic numerals, the font was much rounder than on my themes (image below). ever since then, it's a model that i always considered 'wow' - moreover, that i would never be in a position to own one myself. fast forward over a decade, many other watches, brand, tastes (yes, was on the 'big watch' train back then, everything 42" or greater), and i feel lucky enough to be in a place on my life to have acquired one. and a beauty at that, i must say. couldn't ask for anything more. but in past few years, tastes have changed, big watches now felt maybe too big. to push things over the edge even further, recently acquiring that damn Jumbo (god bless that piece!) just made my thoughts of the collection more complicated. but good lord, i chased this watch for over a decade, and in less than a year I'm contemplating its departure...wtf so to those who I'm sure have been/are in similar dilemma, any words of wisdom? having the Jumbo and the ROO seemed like good bookends to the RO family, that was my logic of keeping. and don't get me wrong, just looking at the ROO makes me smile... I'm sure it will continue to do so. that said, it's 1of 3 chronos in the drawer, alongside JLC EWC (also a quite large piece) and Speedy Pro (which, although not as hefty as the ROO or EWC, i do consider it arguably as sporty and even more versatile to go formal dressy and casual). and therefore, the counter logic was to trim down to just the Speedy as my one 'big' watch, that has the benefits of being a chrono, cam go dressy/casual, and has the historical presence to boot. yes, first world problems no doubt. but would be interesting hear others' POVs. and if for nothing else, some good chatter. |
4 June 2017, 02:02 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
|
I personally love the Black theme, so, I'd keep it. At 42mm, it's really not THAT big. Looks great on u too.
__________________
"Best to stay silent and have the world think you're a fool than to speak and remove all doubt." SMD |
4 June 2017, 02:04 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bklyn
Posts: 1,471
|
|
4 June 2017, 03:51 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,221
|
Definitely looks great on you, it's a keeper I think.
|
4 June 2017, 03:56 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,544
|
If you have the Jubmo now, and love the Speedmaster as much as you say, I'd sell the ROO. Gives you the $ and flexibility to try something else.
Just my $0.02. :)
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob |
4 June 2017, 07:39 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
I loved the 42s as well but once the 44s were released they became the AP for me, so I can understand your feelings have changed... only mine has not to downsizing.
|
4 June 2017, 09:12 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: HK
Watch: Piaget,Rolex,AP,HB
Posts: 1,040
|
It's a nice piece but perhaps one of those where it is better until it's worn because it is cumbersome especially on a bracelet as well as not being versatile.
|
4 June 2017, 09:58 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bklyn
Posts: 1,471
|
had it on all afternoon... it's slowly convincing me to stay
|
4 June 2017, 10:29 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: US
Posts: 241
|
Keep it. It's a great looking watch. If not, I'll be keeping an eye for it in the Classifieds section.
|
4 June 2017, 11:06 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Global
Watch: 116719
Posts: 482
|
I'm in a similar position. I have a ROO Safari, I love the watch but hardly ever wear it, maybe ten times the last two years. I just prefer my Rolex, 116520, 16710 *3!, and a DeepSea Cameron. However i really like how it looks and cannot bring myself to sell it.
|
4 June 2017, 11:43 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bklyn
Posts: 1,471
|
|
5 June 2017, 12:04 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
|
It's a beautiful watch that looks perfectly proportioned on your wrist. Personally, I would keep it
|
5 June 2017, 12:25 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
You have the wrists to rock it. Looks great.
|
5 June 2017, 12:31 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Jeddah
Watch: SS Sky Dweller
Posts: 189
|
Sell it, don't look back and buy something else that really speaks to you. Life is too short..
__________________
Day-Date 18239, Daytona 116523, Breitling B1, Submariner 16610 LV Kermit, Polar Explorer ll 16570, 126600 SD 43, 126710 BLRO Pepsi, SS Sky Dweller 326934. |
5 June 2017, 12:35 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bklyn
Posts: 1,471
|
Quote:
|
|
5 June 2017, 12:49 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Asia
Posts: 409
|
keep it and get a rubber strap. it really looks great on the OEM AP rubber
|
5 June 2017, 03:54 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,913
|
Keep it. If a piece from your collection needs to go then I would get rid of the JLC before this one.
|
5 June 2017, 04:46 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: NH
Watch: 228239, PAM00684
Posts: 2,121
|
Definitely keep it!
__________________
Rolex 228239 PAM00684 |
5 June 2017, 04:59 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bklyn
Posts: 1,471
|
|
5 June 2017, 05:27 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 3,927
|
I recently went through a similar evolution in taste. Also added a jumbo and couldn't be more satisfied with it. I let go of my ROO grey themes because I wasn't wearing it enough - it was starting to feel too big. I still love the way it looks but much prefer more traditionally sized watches now.
Go with your gut. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.