The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 July 2017, 05:24 PM   #1
Dennisoul
"TRF" Member
 
Dennisoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Andy
Location: Scotland
Watch: 16570 Polar
Posts: 1,085
Sub running 8 seconds fast

Hey folks....acquired a Sub no date from 2007 about 2 weeks ago, I've no idea when it last had a service, it runs consistently at 8 seconds fast per 24 hours..I've use the atomic clock for setting it..I know the cesc is -4 / +6 per 24 hours.....I've done the crown up & down regulating when it's taken off at night and this keeps it to the 8 seconds per 24 hours...does it mean there's anything wrong and needs a service or just be content, which I'm happy to be if you guys reckon 8secs per 24 hours is acceptable.....I gave it a full 40 turns wind a couple of days ago and it still keeps it a 8 seconds fast...your thoughts please folks...

Cheers, Andy
Dennisoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2017, 05:28 PM   #2
Bigsykedaddy
"TRF" Member
 
Bigsykedaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Florida
Watch: LVc | SubC
Posts: 2,285
8 seconds fast is normal from everything I have seen. The most important part is that it is consistent, which you said it is. If it being 8 seconds fast bothers you, since your watch is out of warranty you can take it to your local AD or watchmaker and have them adjust it for you. It is a quick job, you should be in and out quickly.

That said even if they do adjust it it may not run exactly what they adjusted it to on the timegrapher, because watches run differently on everyone due to levels of activity etc.

Congratulations on your new pickup and wear it in the best of health.

(P.S. sorry for run on sentences , bad grammar, it's late)
Bigsykedaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2017, 05:43 PM   #3
Uhtred59
"TRF" Member
 
Uhtred59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Ken
Location: Europa
Watch: 216570
Posts: 693
My OCD would make me bring it in.
Uhtred59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2017, 05:48 PM   #4
arcadelt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Monaro, NSW
Posts: 846
Wouldn't be a problem for me.
arcadelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2017, 05:50 PM   #5
MonBK
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
Keep it as it is or have it regulated.

Either way is fine.
MonBK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2017, 05:54 PM   #6
sensui
2024 Pledge Member
 
sensui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,443
If it's consistent, you probably just need regulation. Any decent watchmaker can check the amplitude for you as well to make sure.
sensui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2017, 05:55 PM   #7
al503
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oregon
Watch: DD40, SD43
Posts: 370
Do you wear it every day or rotate and let it run down?

My first 16610 purchased new from an AD was about ~16 seconds fast per day. I sent it back to RSC twice. Each time they charged me for a new bezel even though it was new, I never used it and I know the second time, I couldn't have damaged it. Regardless, it came back running ~16 seconds fast per day after both visits. I gave up and used it as-is. Since I didn't wear it every day and had to reset it about once a week anyway (usually after the weekend), it didn't bother me too much.
al503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2017, 06:32 PM   #8
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennisoul View Post
Hey folks....acquired a Sub no date from 2007 about 2 weeks ago, I've no idea when it last had a service, it runs consistently at 8 seconds fast per 24 hours..I've use the atomic clock for setting it..I know the cesc is -4 / +6 per 24 hours.....I've done the crown up & down regulating when it's taken off at night and this keeps it to the 8 seconds per 24 hours...does it mean there's anything wrong and needs a service or just be content, which I'm happy to be if you guys reckon 8secs per 24 hours is acceptable.....I gave it a full 40 turns wind a couple of days ago and it still keeps it a 8 seconds fast...your thoughts please folks...

Cheers, Andy
I would doubt if 8 seconds difference out of 86400 in a day would make a lot of difference only if you were OCD about it.Consistency is the most important element in any mechanical watch,it could be regulated on timing machine to around -2+2 seconds,but this dont always mean it will perform exactly the same on the wrist.Many factors effect accuracy while on the wrist such as by the earth's gravity, metal expansion and contraction,mainspring-power-reserve,different temperature variations, subtle changes in lubrication and friction, shocks, and so on.The fact is that no mechanical watch made will keep perfect time, very close yes but perfect no.And the COSC spec is a AVERAGE of -4+6 seconds over any 24 hour period, and in the first 10 of testing the bare uncased movement could vary by 10 seconds either way over a single 24 hour period and still pass the test.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2017, 07:38 PM   #9
ejvette
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
ejvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: East Hampton NY
Watch: me break clays..
Posts: 7,516
It wouldn't bother me because I change watches almost daily
__________________
Rolex•Omega•Breitling•Grand Seiko•Tudor

"No one on their death bed ever said I wish I worked more" My Grandma

* Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons *
ejvette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2017, 07:44 PM   #10
Mick P
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
Sorry +8secs a day is unacceptably fast. You do not pay a lot of money for a watch with lousy performance like that.

The fact that the fastness is consistent is good news and it just needs regulating.

Having said that, you bought it in 2007 and a service may be in order.

Regards

Mick
Mick P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2017, 08:00 PM   #11
The Libertine
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
I would leave it. Not a fan of having my watches opened unless absolutely necessary.

Better to run fast than slow, and even at 8 seconds, your watch is still under a minute fast each week. That is very good accuracy.
The Libertine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2017, 08:11 PM   #12
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick P View Post
Sorry +8secs a day is unacceptably fast. You do not pay a lot of money for a watch with lousy performance like that.

The fact that the fastness is consistent is good news and it just needs regulating.

Having said that, you bought it in 2007 and a service may be in order.

Regards

Mick
He bought it a couple weeks ago.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2017, 09:02 PM   #13
Mick P
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
He bought it a couple weeks ago.
Fair point, however unless the watch has a known service history, I would still put it in for a service.

Mick
Mick P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2017, 09:28 PM   #14
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,776
I would take it to a watch maker that I trust locally. If no one, I would then look to the TRF as we have several on here that could help. I don't believe in servicing watches before needed but some trusted professional advice could help you make an informed decision. If the watch is a keeper I might go ahead and have a complete service.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2017, 05:41 AM   #15
Dennisoul
"TRF" Member
 
Dennisoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Andy
Location: Scotland
Watch: 16570 Polar
Posts: 1,085
Thanks everyone for your advice and help, after reading your comments I'm happy to let it run as it is for the moment....I think not knowing when it was last serviced is worth me keeping in mind, should it start gaining significantly more time than the 8 seconds I'll then consider putting it in for a service.

Cheers
Andy
Dennisoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2017, 09:47 AM   #16
Tigerjeebs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8
I recall a watch repair specially had said you need to measure the time over a week and average out the total, one day is too short.

He also stated that as a watch nears its need for service, as the lubricants begin to dry up, the watch will speed up. As the lubrication dries, the arch the balance wheel makes begins to get shorter, due to the higher friction, and the watch gains time.

I believe your watch is when Rolex used COSC and not the +/- 2 second standard, you are not far off in terms of accuracy. Do you know when the watch was last serviced?
Tigerjeebs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2017, 09:51 AM   #17
THC
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
THC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Mandeville La
Watch: 126333
Posts: 10,666
If mine were running 30 seconds fast, I doubt I would ever know... and I love it that way
THC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2017, 09:53 AM   #18
uansari1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Doha, Qatar
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 535
I'd take it to a trusted watchmaker for a spin on the timegrapher. Those three magic numbers will tell you if it needs a service or just a regulation. That being said, if there's no service history, can't hurt to get a 10 year old watch serviced.
__________________
Explorer II 16570 Polar (3186)
GMT Master II 116710LN
GMT Master II 126710BLRO (jubilee)
Explorer 124270
Omega Seamaster GMT 50th Anniversary
uansari1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2017, 09:56 AM   #19
116500LN
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: -Nan
Posts: 365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigerjeebs View Post
He also stated that as a watch nears its need for service, as the lubricants begin to dry up, the watch will speed up. As the lubrication dries, the arch the balance wheel makes begins to get shorter, due to the higher friction, and the watch gains time.
Watch actually slows down when it starts needing service. What do you know in the universe that goes faster with less lubricant? Watch will still continue its complete arch. The friction will slow it down.
116500LN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2017, 09:57 AM   #20
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
This is me. I limit the times the back is taken of my watches, because that is where things can go wrong. Why thake the chance for only 8 seconds a day???

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Libertine View Post
I would leave it. Not a fan of having my watches opened unless absolutely necessary.

Better to run fast than slow, and even at 8 seconds, your watch is still under a minute fast each week. That is very good accuracy.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2017, 09:57 AM   #21
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,511
X2. You don't know how the watch was cared for the last 10 years, I would want it serviced regardless.
If it kept COSC then maybe delay a routine service but at this point you have 2 good reasons to get it serviced.

Quote:
Originally Posted by uansari1 View Post
I'd take it to a trusted watchmaker for a spin on the timegrapher. Those three magic numbers will tell you if it needs a service or just a regulation. That being said, if there's no service history, can't hurt to get a 10 year old watch serviced.
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2017, 10:48 AM   #22
Tigerjeebs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by 116500LN View Post
Watch actually slows down when it starts needing service. What do you know in the universe that goes faster with less lubricant? Watch will still continue its complete arch. The friction will slow it down.
Source? As it can be read from watch makers online, anything that effectively shortens the hairspring or the gear train, due to stray lubrication or dirt/friction, can cause the watch to run fast. Just because a watch needs service does not mean it slows down.
Tigerjeebs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.