ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

yoniman · 23 July 2017, 01:41 PM

Hi fellow TRFers. Here is a snippet of review/comment from Gentleman's Gazette Top 100 watches. With regards to GMT 2 ( and using a photo of a BLNR ) Here is what they say: "There are some issues that make it inadvisable to wear in sports conditions..."

I asked for their feedback in to what exactly it is referring to as inadvisable and has not come back to me yet.

Any thoughts?

Cheers

skkali168 · 23 July 2017, 01:51 PM

Because it’s too nice? Lol

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

WS9D · 23 July 2017, 01:58 PM

Just look at all the "Is it safe..." threads.

ras47 · 23 July 2017, 02:03 PM

On the Rugby pitch? Not safe - don't wear it. But unless they clarify that statement, I say they're full of crap.

JR16 · 23 July 2017, 10:19 PM

500 meters deep in the ocean

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

jhunter3 · 24 July 2017, 06:56 AM

They're proabably talking about the PCLs.

The Libertine · 24 July 2017, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jhunter3

They're proabably talking about the PCLs.

First thought to cross my mind as well.

locutus49 · 24 July 2017, 09:02 AM

These scared and frightened people crack me up. What a sad way to live life, constantly afraid their very robust watch might get a scratch or something.

I just do not understand that mentality. Reminds me how, in the 1950's people would actually keep their living room furniture covered in clear plastic. The bubble-wrap mentality.

gates · 24 July 2017, 09:09 AM

Probably wouldn't wear it running with the bulls in Pamploma unless I was very fast - which I'm not:-)

23 July 2017, 01:41 PM	#1
yoniman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Real Name: Jesse Location: New Zealand Watch: 116234, 116613LB Posts: 1,855	GMT 2 comment from Gentleman's Gazette Hi fellow TRFers. Here is a snippet of review/comment from Gentleman's Gazette Top 100 watches. With regards to GMT 2 ( and using a photo of a BLNR ) Here is what they say: "There are some issues that make it inadvisable to wear in sports conditions..." I asked for their feedback in to what exactly it is referring to as inadvisable and has not come back to me yet. Any thoughts? Cheers

23 July 2017, 02:03 PM	#4
ras47 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Real Name: Robert Location: Northern NJ Watch: 16710 BLRO Posts: 3,064	On the Rugby pitch? Not safe - don't wear it. But unless they clarify that statement, I say they're full of crap. __________________ Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710 Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono

23 July 2017, 01:51 PM	#2
skkali168 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Real Name: RP Location: irvine Watch: 116689 Posts: 1,222	Because it’s too nice? Lol Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

23 July 2017, 01:58 PM	#3
WS9D "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Steve Location: Shasta Watch: es..More Watches! Posts: 2,415	Just look at all the "Is it safe..." threads.

23 July 2017, 10:19 PM	#5
JR16 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: USA Posts: 6,253	500 meters deep in the ocean Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

24 July 2017, 06:56 AM	#6
jhunter3 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Charleston, SC Watch: 1680 Submariner Posts: 316	They're proabably talking about the PCLs.

24 July 2017, 09:02 AM	#8
locutus49 Banned Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: John Location: La Jolla, CA Watch: Platona Posts: 12,194	These scared and frightened people crack me up. What a sad way to live life, constantly afraid their very robust watch might get a scratch or something. I just do not understand that mentality. Reminds me how, in the 1950's people would actually keep their living room furniture covered in clear plastic. The bubble-wrap mentality.

24 July 2017, 09:09 AM	#9
gates "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2016 Location: az Watch: A few Posts: 242	Probably wouldn't wear it running with the bulls in Pamploma unless I was very fast - which I'm not:-)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)