The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 August 2017, 06:39 AM   #1
Subtiki
"TRF" Member
 
Subtiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Art Grove
Location: Bakersfield, Ca
Watch: Sea-Dweller 43
Posts: 122
How glorious it would be if....

They used the Explorer II Case for the Submariner and Daytona. After trying on the Explorer II, what a great all around size.
Subtiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2017, 07:20 AM   #2
sager
"TRF" Member
 
sager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Sage
Location: MENA
Posts: 1,563
You are making me wonder. I've never actually tried one on.
sager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2017, 07:28 AM   #3
lhawli
"TRF" Member
 
lhawli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
I own the Omega PO and Speedy Pro both @42mm and they are a nice size. Tho I have to admit borderline for my 6.75" wrist.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01]
Rolex DateJust 41 [126334]
Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV]
Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR]
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN]
lhawli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2017, 07:32 AM   #4
Abdullasaif
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Dubai
Watch: bipolar
Posts: 2,854
It fits quite large but, either way i have one and you'll have many people disagreeing with you
Abdullasaif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2017, 08:30 AM   #5
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Not for me, the Exp2 wears too round and too wide for me, I prefer the Sub dial at 40 with the wider lugs giving it the feel of 42.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2017, 08:38 AM   #6
ferrissteve11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,116
Twinlock crown is also a bit smallish for the case size IMO.
ferrissteve11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2017, 10:27 AM   #7
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
Sounds good but I doubt Rolex would ever expand the case, but hey who knows
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude
Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238

16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped)
Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2017, 11:29 AM   #8
Subtiki
"TRF" Member
 
Subtiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Art Grove
Location: Bakersfield, Ca
Watch: Sea-Dweller 43
Posts: 122
Twinlock a little small, but would look good with a triple lock.
Subtiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.