ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

daveycrawford · 18 September 2017, 09:06 PM

Hi
For some reason my 1973 Double Red Sea Dweller cam with a 1971 9315 bracelet. It is a PATETED miss print one.
My question is could this have been an original fitted bracelet or do you think it is retro fitted? Also is it better to leave it fitted or look for a 1973 one to match the watch year?
Thanks,

Davey

Haywood_Milton · 18 September 2017, 09:11 PM

Bracelet year, case back date code and main case number may all appear to fall within a year or two of each other --- quite normal.

Haywood

daveycrawford · 18 September 2017, 09:33 PM

Thanks for the reply
Normally I am not too fussed about the original bracelet, but nice to have the miss-spelled PATETED one with the watch. I would like to keep it like that unless its not normal to have a difference between the years.
If anyone else can confirm this that would be great.

redfred · 18 September 2017, 10:54 PM

I don't think you need another response, Haywood has spoken, you won't get much better.

fmc000 · 18 September 2017, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redfred

I don't think you need another response, Haywood has spoken, you won't get much better.

Exactly!

daveycrawford · 19 September 2017, 12:42 AM

Ok then that's it sorted
Many Thanks its much appreciated
Kind Regards
Davey

18 September 2017, 09:06 PM	#1
daveycrawford "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: UK Posts: 136	1971 Rolex 9315 PATETED bracelet Hi For some reason my 1973 Double Red Sea Dweller cam with a 1971 9315 bracelet. It is a PATETED miss print one. My question is could this have been an original fitted bracelet or do you think it is retro fitted? Also is it better to leave it fitted or look for a 1973 one to match the watch year? Thanks, Davey

18 September 2017, 09:11 PM	#2
Haywood_Milton "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Yes, it is ! Location: Cheshire & Mersey Watch: Military issue Sub Posts: 1,330	Bracelet year, case back date code and main case number may all appear to fall within a year or two of each other --- quite normal. Haywood __________________ Comex:5513,5514,1665x2,16800x2,16600 Mil sub:5517x2,5513x9,5512 Submariner:6536/1x2,5508,5513 PCG u/line & double SWISS (America's Cup),5513 giltx2, 5513 m-firstx2,5513 gloss WGx2,1680 Red,1680 White Mk1 & Mk2 Sea-Dweller:1665 DRSDx3,Great Whitex3 GMT-Master:6542x2 (1 Bakelite),1675x8 (2 gilt), 16750 & SeaKing 116710LN Explorer:1016x6 (1 gilt),5500x3,14270 Blackout, Orange 1655 x4 Milgauss 1019x3 Cosmo 6263 *RNCD DSSD 116660.

18 September 2017, 09:33 PM	#3
daveycrawford "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: UK Posts: 136	Thanks for the reply Normally I am not too fussed about the original bracelet, but nice to have the miss-spelled PATETED one with the watch. I would like to keep it like that unless its not normal to have a difference between the years. If anyone else can confirm this that would be great.

18 September 2017, 10:54 PM	#4
redfred "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: newcastle Posts: 342	I don't think you need another response, Haywood has spoken, you won't get much better.

19 September 2017, 12:42 AM	#6
daveycrawford "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: UK Posts: 136	Ok then that's it sorted Many Thanks its much appreciated Kind Regards Davey

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)