ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 October 2017, 09:16 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
|
GMT II authentification help please :)
Hi guys,
Im looking at this GMT for sale, and was wondering if anyone can give me some advice on the authenticity? I've tried comparing it to online images but don't trust myself. The sale price is below market value so just trying to get an idea. The seller is a bit difficult and could only get these photographs, but i will be inspecting watch (after travelling a while) in person, and wanted to know if the journey could be worth it? What things should i be checking out with the watch in hand? Thanks! |
20 October 2017, 09:22 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Canada
Watch: 16710
Posts: 207
|
GMT II authentification help please 😊
We’d need much better pictures and to actually have the caseback opened, but as it sits, I don’t see any red flags.
May be a service dial with the combination of luminova, holes case, and hollow end links. Do you know what year it’s supposed to be?
__________________
18038 | 16710 x 2 | 216570 | 214270 | 14000 | 79220N | 79280P x 2 | 3572.50 | 3576.50 |
20 October 2017, 09:25 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
|
I have asked, but not much information unfortunately @Verticalhorizon
|
20 October 2017, 09:29 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Canada
Watch: 16710
Posts: 207
|
Quote:
@edtheaussie I will wait for the experts, but yeah, if you are unsure, I will meet him at a jeweller’s shop and have the caseback off and the markings between the lugs examined to be safe.
__________________
18038 | 16710 x 2 | 216570 | 214270 | 14000 | 79220N | 79280P x 2 | 3572.50 | 3576.50 |
|
20 October 2017, 09:32 PM | #5 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,792
|
Looks legit to me
I like seeing an old Rolex with war wounds like that. Prefer that over a safe queen |
20 October 2017, 09:41 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Current Life
Watch: Omega, IWC
Posts: 95
|
Better pictures are needed to be sure. If the seller is not willing to help then it's probably for a reason and I'd passed on it. I sold watches before and I never had a problem to answer questions and provide additional pictures to prove the watch is genuine.
|
20 October 2017, 10:09 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
|
It'll take me about 2 hours travel for the inspection, so i think i'm going to go at least check it out tomorrow anyway. Wish me luck!
|
21 October 2017, 02:45 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: In your basement?
Watch: Oysterquartz
Posts: 88
|
Very likely Genuine because replica 16710 have lower crown height to correspond with their modified GMT 2836-2 movement - they could never get this feature right.
Clasp is genuine More pictures needed however to ascertain if this is franken watch But so far I am strongly leaning to genuine as other features add up (e.g. end link number engraving, bezel teeth, handstack) |
21 October 2017, 05:45 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
|
Thanks for all the replies guys, and thank you to the moderators for moving my enquiry to the correct sub forum.
I'm just on my way to inspect the watch, I think if the serial places it in the late 1990s and the reference engraving looks good I will go for it. What esle should I be looking at specifically when I have the watch in hand? Thanks, Ed |
21 October 2017, 07:39 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
What is the order of the hands bottom to top
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
21 October 2017, 08:22 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
|
From what I can tell it is Hour/GMT/min/sec - which would be correct but will check with watch in hand.
Last edited by edtheaussie; 21 October 2017 at 08:27 AM.. Reason: incorrect written |
21 October 2017, 08:27 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
|
-sorry double post
Last edited by edtheaussie; 21 October 2017 at 08:28 AM.. Reason: double post |
21 October 2017, 08:55 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
|
Quote:
Adam
__________________
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill "We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done." |
|
21 October 2017, 01:59 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Krishna
Location: Australia
Posts: 611
|
Watch looks good to me. Based on what you said about the seller, I suggest you give this a pass.
|
21 October 2017, 02:26 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: In your basement?
Watch: Oysterquartz
Posts: 88
|
Quote:
It's true that this is no longer the definitive way of distinguishing a replica/genuine GMT Rolex as the latest replica 116710 has the correct handstack using a modified 2824-2 movement (with an added module). But to my knowledge, non of the older replica 16710 ever had a reliable correct handstack movement and even if this example did have a correct handstack, the crown height and crownguard corresponds to genuine |
|
22 October 2017, 07:32 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
|
I got the watch, thanks for all the help guys!
It is a 1996-7 serial with a service dial, as the dial glows but the hands do not. I might try to source a tritium dial so if i want to make it 'correct' in the future i can. The watch is in good condition, bevels present and the bracelet clasp number matches the year of watch. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.