The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Classifieds > WatchOut!!!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 March 2018, 06:59 PM   #1
georgekart
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,550
Fake GMT-Master II

https://www.chrono24.com/rolex/oyste...-id7825264.htm

Here's a fake GMT-Master II being sold on chrono24. Report it so people don't get it. I also have suspicions about other watch from their inventory, namely https://www.chrono24.com/rolex/datej...-id7814288.htm , can anyone confirm my suspicion?
georgekart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2018, 07:26 PM   #2
SkyKing31
"TRF" Member
 
SkyKing31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Manalapan Florida
Watch: Tridor Masterpiece
Posts: 2,819
The Datejust isn't fake. The dial and bezel are not factory original but the watch itself is not a fake. The GMT also is genuine.
__________________
It's been said that money can never buy happiness which is true, but I'd rather cry while seated in the back of a Rolls Royce limousine instead crying while seated on a bicycle.
SkyKing31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2018, 07:35 PM   #3
georgekart
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,550
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyKing31 View Post
The Datejust isn't fake. The dial and bezel are not factory original but the watch itself is not a fake. The GMT also is genuine.
Might be, as I said I am not so sure about the Datejust, but cyclops looked off to me. https://cdn2.chrono24.com/images/uhr...814288_xxl.jpg (you can zoom in on this direct link to pic) As of GMT, I totally disagree, look at this pic for example https://cdn2.chrono24.com/images/uhr...25264b_xxl.jpg (2nd slide), that's not how ceramic bezel is supposed to look like. Numbers are painted, they should be engraved.
georgekart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2018, 07:40 PM   #4
SkyKing31
"TRF" Member
 
SkyKing31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Manalapan Florida
Watch: Tridor Masterpiece
Posts: 2,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by georgekart View Post
Might be, as I said I am not so sure about the Datejust, but cyclops looked off to me. https://cdn2.chrono24.com/images/uhr...814288_xxl.jpg (you can zoom in on this direct link to pic) As of GMT, I totally disagree, look at this pic for example https://cdn2.chrono24.com/images/uhr...25264b_xxl.jpg (2nd slide), that's not how ceramic bezel is supposed to look like. Numbers are painted, they should be engraved.
I am certain about both watches. The pic angle is either bad on the GMT, or perhaps the bezel has been replaced by a non original or has been altered in some way. It is difficult for me to tell at this hour, but I am certain that the GMT is a real Rolex.
__________________
It's been said that money can never buy happiness which is true, but I'd rather cry while seated in the back of a Rolls Royce limousine instead crying while seated on a bicycle.
SkyKing31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2018, 09:57 PM   #5
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,528
Is the GMT stack correct?

I can't quite make it out in the pic.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2018, 12:46 AM   #6
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
Hand stack looks correct.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2018, 03:44 PM   #7
jimcarver
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Abroad
Posts: 829
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyKing31 View Post
, but I am certain that the GMT is a real Rolex.
I am no expert but what makes you think its real, it looks pretty bad to me. Look at the rear pic, the top of the clasp isn't even straight.
jimcarver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2018, 03:47 PM   #8
49ers101hitters
"TRF" Member
 
49ers101hitters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Real Name: Hugh
Location: Silicon Valley
Watch: Sub, 2xDJ, Zenith
Posts: 246
Fake GMT-Master II

That’s a deal GMT. Don’t accuse people of selling “fakes” when you have no grounds to do so.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
49ers101hitters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2018, 06:39 PM   #9
georgekart
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,550
Quote:
Originally Posted by 49ers101hitters View Post
That’s a deal GMT. Don’t accuse people of selling “fakes” when you have no grounds to do so.
I do have grounds to do so, because it has a fake bezel (not engraved like it should be) and fake clasp on the bracelet (not straight), combining those two, as well as DJ I sent link to with non-factory dial, bezel and magnification issue as well as one DSSD I found in their inventory that has bezel issues as well, I can assume they sell fakes. And also to be sure I asked on rolex subreddit and we reached conclusion they were fake.
georgekart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2018, 07:19 PM   #10
Max16013
"TRF" Member
 
Max16013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Here
Watch: DJ 16013
Posts: 247
Crap quality photos, real watches


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Max16013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2018, 11:39 AM   #11
zaydans
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Joe
Location: CONUS
Watch: Rolex 116710
Posts: 994
Gmt II looks legit to me based on chs but that bezel doesn’t look great but I put that down to terrible pictures
zaydans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 March 2018, 07:04 PM   #12
georgekart
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,550
Quote:
Originally Posted by zaydans View Post
Gmt II looks legit to me based on chs but that bezel doesn’t look great but I put that down to terrible pictures
Bezel is definitively not original. Look at dot between 4 and 6. It is too close to 6, no matter what angle that wouldn't happen.
georgekart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2018, 01:13 AM   #13
Jacobson
"TRF" Member
 
Jacobson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA, UK, UAE
Posts: 670
not too sure about the crown on the GMT as well
__________________
ROLEX: 16570 - 16610LV - 116610LN - 116610LV - 16710 - 116710BLNR - 126710BLRO - 116622 Rhodium - 116520 Black - 116500LN White - 116500LN Black - 228206 Ice
AP: 15450ST White - 15202ST Blue - 26331ST -- PP: 5711/1A Blue - 5056P-001 -- BP: 5008 1130 71S -- JLC: 3908420 -- Tudor: M79470-0001
Jacobson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2018, 07:11 PM   #14
asiparks
"TRF" Member
 
asiparks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: ing the Detectives
Posts: 1,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by georgekart View Post
Bezel is definitively not original. Look at dot between 4 and 6. It is too close to 6, no matter what angle that wouldn't happen.
good point! The bezel markings are quite off and the flip lock clasp looks appalling....

There are fakes with the correct hand stack, curious what makes people think that this is a genuine GMTc ?
asiparks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 02:44 AM   #15
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Have to agree on the GMT bezel being aftermarket. It also appears to be raised above the bezel ring. And the polished case sides appear to have been amateurishly brushed. In short I wouldn't buy it, and I'd be upset if I had. Can't say with certainty that it's a worthless Shanghai effort but seller should at least disclose exactly what the deal is.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 04:02 AM   #16
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onikage View Post
Have to agree on the GMT bezel being aftermarket. It also appears to be raised above the bezel ring. And the polished case sides appear to have been amateurishly brushed. In short I wouldn't buy it, and I'd be upset if I had. Can't say with certainty that it's a worthless Shanghai effort but seller should at least disclose exactly what the deal is.
Fake or genuine. Fakes must be getting better when members can't tell one from the other.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 05:17 AM   #17
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
Fake or genuine. Fakes must be getting better when members can't tell one from the other.
Yeah.. hear ya, not a good look. Though personally I give up with ceramics as they're that close. I can't ascertain anything from pictures. Makes you wonder how many members are successfully pulling the wool over 'INCOMING!!'
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2018, 04:05 AM   #18
Wahlberg
"TRF" Member
 
Wahlberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Paris
Posts: 3,590
I've sent them a message and they confirmed it's an aftermarket bezel.

I still find it strange, easy to miss but still it's so obvious as well.
Wahlberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.