The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 December 2008, 10:01 AM   #1
GBJIV
"TRF" Member
 
GBJIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Jackson
Location: So. California
Posts: 2,893
Automatics like PAM 88 no clear caseback.

Is this because the auto winder "wedge" (sorry guys - As much as I wish I was more of a WIS - I'm just not their yet with the terminology) would just be in the way of the beautiful movement we see on manual PAMS? I know the 270 has clear back but the "winder" is in the way a bit. Any thoughts?

Thanks - I probably have neglected to mention for awhile that I LOVE TRF!
__________________
Jackson
GBJIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2008, 10:10 AM   #2
toph
"TRF" Member
 
toph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
I also wonder, as i really wish they did!!!
__________________


"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety."

Member No.# 11795
toph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2008, 10:37 AM   #3
GBJIV
"TRF" Member
 
GBJIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Jackson
Location: So. California
Posts: 2,893
Yeah, but the back of your 183 is gorgeous!!!!!!!!
__________________
Jackson
GBJIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2008, 06:18 PM   #4
argee1977
"TRF" Member
 
argee1977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
I'd hazard a guess that it's due to the 7750 being a bit of a workhorse movement and not that pretty, maybe also a lack of any engraving by Panerai?
__________________

PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
argee1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2008, 09:05 PM   #5
toph
"TRF" Member
 
toph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by GBJIV View Post
Yeah, but the back of your 183 is gorgeous!!!!!!!!
__________________


"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety."

Member No.# 11795
toph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2008, 09:06 PM   #6
toph
"TRF" Member
 
toph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by argee1977 View Post
I'd hazard a guess that it's due to the 7750 being a bit of a workhorse movement and not that pretty, maybe also a lack of any engraving by Panerai?
yeah but why not do it up a bit? for the money you pay?
__________________


"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety."

Member No.# 11795
toph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2008, 09:23 PM   #7
argee1977
"TRF" Member
 
argee1977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by toph View Post
yeah but why not do it up a bit? for the money you pay?

In all honesty, it's just cosmetic, i have argued the point before about Panerai using ETA and not really doing anything with it, but the way i meant it was by taking a proven design, taking it apart and then improving it, engraving it and making it look nice really doesn't do anything to the accuracy, quality or longevity of the movement.

If they did what i wanted then they'd get the pieces of the 7750, see what parts would be better in either closer tolerances, different materials, etc and then put it back together with the parts from the ETA and parts Panerai produce to improve the movement.
__________________

PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
argee1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2008, 09:32 PM   #8
Trurolexer
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
I like clear caseback. But it's OK for me if they have soled caseback too.
I want 232 & 000. this two is solid caseback.
Trurolexer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2008, 04:11 AM   #9
argee1977
"TRF" Member
 
argee1977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
Actually, i just thought of something, the 212 and 213 come with display casebacks and both have the 7750, so i don't know why panerai don't do more widespread display casebacks on the auto's, although as you know these are both chronos, but so are the daylights and they are hidden away.

__________________

PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
argee1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2008, 05:30 AM   #10
Launch Mini
"TRF" Member
 
Launch Mini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Canada, eh
Watch: can I?
Posts: 6,240
No pics, but my auto Pam 98 is display back too.
Then they have the display back on the 233, and not a whole lot to really see.
__________________
Something witty to go here.

Member # 293
Launch Mini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2008, 05:32 AM   #11
argee1977
"TRF" Member
 
argee1977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Launch Mini View Post
No pics, but my auto Pam 98 is display back too.
Then they have the display back on the 233, and not a whole lot to really see.

The 98 has a Girard-Perregaux Cal 59 which is a beautiful movement on its own, the 233 has the in-house P2002 which again is another lovely movement, although as you say it's a struggle seeing much of it due to the 3 barrels.
__________________

PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
argee1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2008, 04:37 PM   #12
niels74
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Siberia,yes it is
Posts: 640
Na the Pick then...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Launch Mini View Post
No pics, but my auto Pam 98 is display back too.
Then they have the display back on the 233, and not a whole lot to really see.
nothing wrong with this back... ll post the Pic for ye John..



Gr
N.
niels74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 December 2008, 04:49 PM   #13
niels74
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Siberia,yes it is
Posts: 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by GBJIV View Post
Is this because the auto winder "wedge" (sorry guys - As much as I wish I was more of a WIS - I'm just not their yet with the terminology) would just be in the way of the beautiful movement we see on manual PAMS? I know the 270 has clear back but the "winder" is in the way a bit. Any thoughts?

Thanks - I probably have neglected to mention for awhile that I LOVE TRF!

Just FYI this is called the Oscillating weight.. ill post a new thread about some calibre's that is quite interesting ... (perhaps not at all))
niels74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.