ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
5 December 2008, 11:36 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Buz
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam
Posts: 5,108
|
BNIB 104K or preloved 88J
Hi guys, I need some advice. I may have my 16613 sold and am thinking about a Pam. I've put a 5k limit on my spending so the question is; a bnib 104K with all the goodies at 4900 or a J series 88, sold new November '07 with all boxes, original croc strap, and two additional straps at 4850. Or, is there another suggestion for me to consider. This will be my first baby step into the world of Pams and I want to make the right choice and I know you guys will give me good advice. Thanks in advance.
__________________
Buz The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis |
5 December 2008, 11:43 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Buz, better you go for 104 IMHO.
|
6 December 2008, 12:14 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Buz
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam
Posts: 5,108
|
Thanks TR, what are the reasons? New vs. preowned or is there something else I need to know?
__________________
Buz The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis |
6 December 2008, 12:27 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
|
If the 88 comes with its boxes, certificates and is in mint condition then don't worry about it being a year old.
This choice comes down to some basic things, do you like the look of the 104 or 88 more and of course, do you need a GMT function? Since the GMT is actually slightly cheaper this kind of negates that argument as you're not paying extra for it, so basically, do you like the look of the 88 or 104, both are pretty similar in everything else, but the 88 has the GMT function, it will also hold its value slightly better.
__________________
PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
|
6 December 2008, 05:33 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Jackson
Location: So. California
Posts: 2,893
|
Quote:
__________________
Jackson |
|
6 December 2008, 05:34 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Jackson
Location: So. California
Posts: 2,893
|
Quote:
__________________
Jackson |
|
6 December 2008, 06:13 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
Some J series watches have it, not sure how many so you'd have to check, it is on all k series luminors though.
__________________
PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
|
|
6 December 2008, 06:03 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Buz
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam
Posts: 5,108
|
Quote:
__________________
Buz The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis |
|
6 December 2008, 06:15 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
Then whatever choice is a winner, and you seem swayed towards the 104 which has universal appeal and is pretty much how a panerai should look. Now the bad news, the choosing of the actual watch is the easy bit, you're about to move into the wonderful world of straps once you make the purchase
__________________
PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
|
|
6 December 2008, 12:25 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
5k for brand new 104 is a GREAT DEAL IMO.
|
6 December 2008, 01:04 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Real Name: Mark
Location: Florida
Watch: Make a guess!
Posts: 1,515
|
The lowest I have seen is $5200.
__________________
16613 Submariner 116523 Daytona Panerai 104 "Speedy Pro" |
6 December 2008, 05:26 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
104
|
6 December 2008, 12:25 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Jackson
Location: So. California
Posts: 2,893
|
I think Both are great... for me 88.
__________________
Jackson |
6 December 2008, 06:06 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
|
i like both alot. As a first Panerai go for the brand new 104
__________________
"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795 |
6 December 2008, 01:51 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Buz
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam
Posts: 5,108
|
Whoa Mike, lume shot is awesome. I like the lume on the 24 hour track.
__________________
Buz The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis |
6 December 2008, 04:29 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Jackson
Location: So. California
Posts: 2,893
|
Wow, that is the lume shot of all lume shots!
__________________
Jackson |
6 December 2008, 09:25 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Buz
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam
Posts: 5,108
|
That lume shot just made my decision more difficult. Ryan, you're right. I haven't even sold the 16613 yet but I've already been looking at different straps.
__________________
Buz The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.