The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4 April 2018, 10:05 AM   #1
Baxterdown
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: South Florida
Posts: 25
Icon5 Submariner vs. Sea-Dweller vs. Deepsea

I put a deposit on a Sub, which my AD is locating right now. In the meantime I looked at the Sea-Dweller and Deepsea on a Rolex catalog and noticed they are nearly identical to the Sub, but larger. I like the idea of a larger watch!

My local AD doesn't have any Deepsea or Sea-Dwellers at the store right now so I'm unable to compare them side by side with the Sub. Are the 3mm and 4mm difference in size noticeable?

I'm not a diver, so performance is not important to me. It's all about the size. I would also appreciate any thoughts on value retention on these vs. the Sub.

Thanks,

Jose
Baxterdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 10:12 AM   #2
antbkny
"TRF" Member
 
antbkny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: Dblue
Posts: 6,723
Not my pic but here you go
antbkny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 10:13 AM   #3
Luchi12
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Bermuda
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baxterdown View Post
I put a deposit on a Sub, which my AD is locating right now. In the meantime I looked at the Sea-Dweller and Deepsea on a Rolex catalog and noticed they are nearly identical to the Sub, but larger. I like the idea of a larger watch!

My local AD doesn't have any Deepsea or Sea-Dwellers at the store right now so I'm unable to compare them side by side with the Sub. Are the 3mm and 4mm difference in size noticeable?

I'm not a diver, so performance is not important to me. It's all about the size. I would also appreciate any thoughts on value retention on these vs. the Sub.

Thanks,

Jose
I have a Sea-Dweller 43mm and have tried both the sub and Deepsea and the difference in size is definitely noticeable on the SD43 & Deepsea compared to the Sub, particularly the Deepsea, it is a much thicker and heavier watch.

The SD43 is also thicker than the Sub so sits a bit higher on the wrist as it has a protruding caseback but the bracelet is also wider on the SD43 keeping the proportions in check, SD43 is also heavier than the sub but not as heavy as the Deepsea.
Luchi12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 10:13 AM   #4
siempreko
"TRF" Member
 
siempreko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Maryland, USA
Watch: Sometimes
Posts: 1,197
Yes. Each mm is very noticeable. I highly recommend that you try each watch on, and decide which one is the right fit for you.

Peace.
siempreko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 10:15 AM   #5
ccaballero
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Florida
Watch: None
Posts: 646
The SD43 is perfectly proportional.
ccaballero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 10:21 AM   #6
TestnDoc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 81
I bought a SD 43 red today. I got to look at a Sub and Deep Sea. The SD is significantly beefier watch, larger diameter and thicker than the Sub. The Deep Sea is even larger. I ultimately decided on the SD because of the new movement, and the fact that the Deep Sea will be getting the new movement as was announced at Basel. But I don't think you can go wrong with any of them!
TestnDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 10:21 AM   #7
Flybak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Canada
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 1,606
They do wear differently, and you should try each on to get a real sense of your preferences. The SD43 proportions are the best, but with the new Deep Sea just released, I'm sure it makes a strong case on that front. For me, the extra thick lugs make the Sub case look disproportionately large on its bracelet. Just my personal feelings on these models.
Flybak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 10:28 AM   #8
comanndr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: rich
Location: florida
Watch: 16570 polar16610lv
Posts: 208
they each wear differently
even more they progressively don't tuck under a cuff like each other
go get fit if you can find them in the flesh
but you can't go wrong with the sub
enjoy
comanndr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 11:21 AM   #9
007_Omega
"TRF" Member
 
007_Omega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Galaxy
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 905
Pretty big difference in size between the 3 of them.

Do you like big watches? Then go with a SD43 or Deep Sea. Then take into account your wrist size and preference. The Deep Sea is huge while the SD43 is just a big watch and much more suited for a daily watch.

The SD43 doesn't fit under my cuffs which are pretty tailored/fitted. The Deep Sea is not going to fit under any cuff that is somewhat properly fitted.

The SD43 is the best balance of an amazing watch, tooly diver, and hefty size while not being too big. The Submariner will be the most versatile and dressiest. The Deep Sea is simply a beast. I love it but it's just too big for me and I couldn't wear it everyday.
007_Omega is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 11:42 AM   #10
meganfox17
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Kuala Lumpur , Ma
Posts: 2,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baxterdown View Post
Sub vs Sea-Dweller vs Deepsea. I like the idea of a larger watch! Are the 3mm and 4mm difference in size noticeable? It's all about the size
What has your research uncovered so far Jose ? https://www.horobox.com/en/review-de...e-rolex-divers
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baxterdown View Post
I would also appreciate any thoughts on value retention on these vs. the Sub
I'm sure the esteemed gentlemen of the forum will provide their expert thoughts and opinions but please keep in mind that this forum is not the United Nations for Rolex value retention security council consensus and investment management department
meganfox17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 11:53 AM   #11
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,097
The Deepsea will not disappoint if big is what you’re looking for.
The SD43 is larger than the Submariner, quite comfortable, and has great wrist presence.
The Submariner is the most comfortable of the 3.

It comes down to what you value most.
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 11:58 AM   #12
speedbird90
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: N/A
Watch: 16710, 16610LV
Posts: 137
The DSSD is very large at 44mm, unless of course, you have a huge wrist. SD43 sits taller than the sub, sub however is your safest bet. Being an owner myself, I can say it slips under the cuff nicely. (the sub)

I'd look at a 116600 if I were you, just throwing it out there. 40mm, slightly taller, more wrist presence, matte dial, no cyclops. I love it. And yes, 3mm and 4mm does make a huge diff to the overall look of these watches.
speedbird90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 12:01 PM   #13
ferrissteve11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by meganfox17 View Post
What has your research uncovered so far Jose ? https://www.horobox.com/en/review-de...e-rolex-divers
I'm sure the esteemed gentlemen of the forum will provide their expert thoughts and opinions but please keep in mind that this forum is not the United Nations for Rolex value retention security council consensus and investment management department


Well said, of the 3 models listed I'd look hard at the SD43 or DSSD. Currently the DSSD (original black dial) is likely to present the most 'bang for your buck' model at present. Its also more challenging to pull off as a daily wearer. I have for nearly 5 years, however I own and run my own company...so there is that...overall between the 3 you really can't go wrong with any of them IMO.
ferrissteve11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 12:05 PM   #14
arizonapaul
"TRF" Member
 
arizonapaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Fountain Hills,Az
Watch: All 3 Sea-Dwellers
Posts: 975
I'd look at a 116600 if I were you, just throwing it out there. 40mm, slightly taller, more wrist presence, matte dial, no cyclops. I love it. And yes, 3mm and 4mm does make a huge diff to the overall look of these watches.[/QUOTE]

I was thinking this exact thought as well plus it's an instant classic in my own humble opinion..

I own all four and you really will be happy whatever you choose.



Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex Sea-Dweller SD43
Rolex D-blue-
Rolex Hulk
Rolex TT Sub-
Rolex SD4000
Omega Ploprof 1200 m
Panerai 510
Panerai 785 set-NIB
Rolex Airking
arizonapaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 12:07 PM   #15
christo4
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: kansas city
Posts: 171
Eeech. There is real merit to considering if one model is too big/long, or too tall ...or too heavy. Try to wear one of each before you commit. Looking at these three, chances are you can flip whichever through this forum if it loses your interest in the coming months and not lo$e anything but heartache.
christo4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 12:33 PM   #16
speedbird90
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: N/A
Watch: 16710, 16610LV
Posts: 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by arizonapaul View Post
I'd look at a 116600 if I were you, just throwing it out there. 40mm, slightly taller, more wrist presence, matte dial, no cyclops. I love it. And yes, 3mm and 4mm does make a huge diff to the overall look of these watches.
I was thinking this exact thought as well plus it's an instant classic in my own humble opinion..

I own all four and you really will be happy whatever you choose.



Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]

speedbird90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 12:50 PM   #17
Mousehunter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Texas
Watch: AK, SD43, Hulk
Posts: 183
Try them on if you can. The SDDS looked incredibly thick on my wrist while the SD43 fit me well.

That said, I am still on a Hulk and GMT list...
Mousehunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 01:19 PM   #18
watchmework
"TRF" Member
 
watchmework's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
Submariner vs. Sea-Dweller vs. Deepsea

I’m not going to reiterate what has been said already, what I’ll leave you with is I upgraded my Sub to the SD43 and couldn’t be happier with the decision. To be honest, the Subs proportions are off when compared to the SD43s. But if I wasn’t a part of TRF I probably would have never noticed, outside of the Sub being square...but I’m glad I did nonetheless. To help illustrate some of the differences in size I’ll offer the below two pictures I took when deciding whether or not to trade in the Sub. The SD43 is my daily watch now.



watchmework is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 01:24 PM   #19
FSUGeoff
"TRF" Member
 
FSUGeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Geoffrey
Location: Ft. Lauderdale
Watch: the Noles Score!
Posts: 638
I own a Sub and a Deepsea, both are great, I don't find the DSSD too large for daily, even business wear, the sub is a little more under the radar (here in SFLA) depends on your wrist and what you want to say. Or you could buy all three and sell the ones you end up wearing less for prob no loss if you buy at MSRP.
__________________
Watches: 126600, 116610LV, 116660 D-Blue, 114060, Omega Speedmaster Professional, Breitling SuperOcean
FSUGeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 01:27 PM   #20
jrs146
"TRF" Member
 
jrs146's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
I haven’t tried on a SD43 yet. But the DSSD was just way too big for me. It’s s beautiful watch but just not for me. My sweet spot is 40mm so I feel very comfortable with the Sub.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own."
-Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter
jrs146 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 01:29 PM   #21
G'ed
"TRF" Member
 
G'ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: RolexHQ boardroom
Posts: 1,232
For everyday wear, Sub no contest. For even more comfort, get old 16610/14060/16600 on Glidelock clasp.
G'ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 06:41 PM   #22
Toivonen
"TRF" Member
 
Toivonen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Vittorio
Location: Italy
Watch: SeaDweller Deepsea
Posts: 1,001
The Deepsea is THE diver watch
__________________
No HEV? No Party!!!
If you LOVE the Sea Dweller... Join the "BDV"
https://www.instagram.com/bandadellavalvola/
https://www.facebook.com/bandadellavalvola/
http://orologi.forumfree.it/?t=75294392
Toivonen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 08:01 PM   #23
Bt122
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Bi coastal
Watch: Ok...Watching
Posts: 937
How big is ur wrist. 6.5-7. I’d go sub. If you are a bigger dude then. Should really try the big ones on... it’s heavy ad big.
Bt122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 08:15 PM   #24
Baxterdown
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: South Florida
Posts: 25
THANK YOU GUYS FOR ALL THE REPLIES!!!!!!

Bt122, I just measured my wrist with a measuring tape and got 7.2. From all your replies, it sounds like the SD43 is the way to go.

OK, I'm gonna contact the AD today to see if he can locate one.

More to come! :-)

Jose
Baxterdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 08:59 PM   #25
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,776
I have owned them all and the SD43, for me, is the perfect Rolex Diver. The case size, bracelet, dial, red text and even the cyclops work for me.
Attached Images
 
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 09:19 PM   #26
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baxterdown View Post
THANK YOU GUYS FOR ALL THE REPLIES!!!!!!

Bt122, I just measured my wrist with a measuring tape and got 7.2. From all your replies, it sounds like the SD43 is the way to go.

OK, I'm gonna contact the AD today to see if he can locate one.

More to come! :-)

Jose
At 7.2 I think you are definitely in the SD43 range. To me, it works best like this:

<7" Sub
7"-8" SD43
>8" DSSD

Not to say you need to be in those number, just seems to my eyes those are the sweet spots for those models.

The new Sea Dweller is just an amazing watch. If you are comfortable with the size and weight you will absolutely love it. Good luck in you search!

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge using Tapatalk
samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 09:21 PM   #27
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,792
Lost part of my post there for some reason. I had also put on there

< 7" Sub may work best

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge using Tapatalk
samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 09:24 PM   #28
Roger Lococco
"TRF" Member
 
Roger Lococco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Roger Lococco
Location: Asia
Watch: 126719BLRO Pepsi
Posts: 2,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baxterdown View Post
THANK YOU GUYS FOR ALL THE REPLIES!!!!!!

Bt122, I just measured my wrist with a measuring tape and got 7.2. From all your replies, it sounds like the SD43 is the way to go.

OK, I'm gonna contact the AD today to see if he can locate one.

More to come! :-)

Jose
Assuming your wrist is relatively flat, then I think the SD43 will be the right fit for you. My wrist is about the same size.

I picked up my SD43 this week and love it. It's a big watch and a watch that will let you know it's there. That said, it only took about an hour to get used to the size. It will not fit under my shirt cuffs - but that's fine and I knew that before I bought it.
__________________
116500 Daytona White Dial
126710BLNR GMT II
126719BLRO Blue Dial Pepsi GMT II
Roger Lococco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 09:28 PM   #29
mountainjogger
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,675
No one has a crystal ball on "value retention."

But there is one fact: if you don't buy the watch that you like best (as opposed to what some think may hold it's value), your purchase will have zero value for your wearing pleasure.
__________________
The King of Cool.
mountainjogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 09:29 PM   #30
dr35mm
"TRF" Member
 
dr35mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Peter
Location: Caribbean
Watch: BB58
Posts: 2,398
If 43 mm is not an issue, go for the SD43, its the sweet spot.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________


Present: BB58 | BB36 | GMW-B5000D-1JF | 6900-PT80

Past: 16610LN | 16622 | 116610LN | 214270
dr35mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.