ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

nolaclarky · 24 April 2018, 11:39 AM

Anyone know why the Tudor Sub tophat acrylic is slightly smaller/less tall than the Rolex Sub tophat? My son has a 1680 from '71 and I have a 79090 or something along those lines Tudor Sub from '91. Thanks!

gt0279a · 24 April 2018, 12:27 PM

Obviously two ref. of crystals t127 vs t125 due to the ETA date placement being different.

Never noticed a difference in height, maybe the hand stack / clearance is not the same.

24 April 2018, 11:39 AM	#1
nolaclarky "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: new orleans Posts: 266	Tophat Question Anyone know why the Tudor Sub tophat acrylic is slightly smaller/less tall than the Rolex Sub tophat? My son has a 1680 from '71 and I have a 79090 or something along those lines Tudor Sub from '91. Thanks!

24 April 2018, 12:27 PM	#2
gt0279a "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Steve Location: Georgia Watch: All of them Posts: 579	Obviously two ref. of crystals t127 vs t125 due to the ETA date placement being different. Never noticed a difference in height, maybe the hand stack / clearance is not the same. __________________ Current: Rolex Daytona 116500 \| Rolex Submariner 116610 \| Zenith El Primero 03.2150.400/69 Past: Rolex Sea Dweller 126600 \| Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 \| Rolex Sea Dweller 16600 \| Rolex Submariner 16610 \| Rolex Submariner 1680

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)