ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 December 2008, 06:27 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Joe
Location: Brandon, FL
Posts: 114
|
What watch would you buy?
I need some input. I have been going back on forth on what watch to buy. I currently have a GMT IIc. I would like to buy another watch for a daily wearer.
Here are my two choices. Tudor Chrono. Fully serviced with box and papers....$3800 Or a Pre-Owned M Series Submariner Date...$3900 Thanks for your input!! |
16 December 2008, 06:34 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Beecher
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: 610,333,264
Posts: 160
|
sub date. I just cant my head around any of the Tudor line. My subdate is daily wear,
but why cant your gmtIIc be a daily?
__________________
The Perpetual Bachelor.... |
16 December 2008, 06:34 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Watch: All of them
Posts: 312
|
I would take the Sub...
__________________
================================================== 116506, 116508 Green, 116619, 116719, 116660, 126660 D-Blue, 126600, 126610LV, 226570 Polar, 116600, 116610LN, 116710LN, 116500 Panda, 16610LV, 16600, 16610, 16570 Polar, 16710 Pepsi. |
16 December 2008, 06:37 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Wil
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 84
|
Alternate between the Sub and GMT for your daily
|
16 December 2008, 06:38 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Land of the Lost
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 2,201
|
Well everyone should have a Subbie! I'm waiting for the redesign, myself.
|
16 December 2008, 06:44 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
|
Tudor Chrono.
I have to have a date window in my watches. So the Tudor Chrono is, for my uses, superior to the Daytona. It's really the only racing chrono I'd own. It kicks the Subbie's butt in my opinion, and is more useful and more rare. |
16 December 2008, 06:46 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Neil
Location: Borders, Scotland
Watch: what your doing.
Posts: 970
|
As much as I love the Sub Date I agree with this
__________________
|
16 December 2008, 06:46 AM | #8 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
|
Do you really need a Chrono for some reason??
If not get the Sub Date.... Not saying the Chrono wont be reliable BUT the Sub will be ever more reliable. (less moving parts) Also this sub is a true classic. But which you want do not buy a watch with hopes of a good resale.
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun |
16 December 2008, 06:48 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Fred
Location: KY, USA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 10,043
|
Take the sub
__________________
Member # 16057 4-Hands Club Tosser Club Member TRF Skypers Group |
16 December 2008, 06:52 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: US
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 2,156
|
I'd go with the Tudor. The Sub and GMTIIc are very similar.
|
16 December 2008, 06:53 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Joe
Location: Brandon, FL
Posts: 114
|
Quote:
I have given up the thought of buying a Daytona because it does not have a date. I have to have the date!! |
|
16 December 2008, 07:22 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
|
I'd get the Tudor Chrono, but not for that price You can find one for $1000 less then that.
|
16 December 2008, 07:36 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
|
Joe, you know that Tudor Chrono is gonna haunt you til you own it, you already have the magnificent GMT IIc which eats the Sub's dinner any day ( ok, heresy I know but I've gone & said it ) so what are you waiting for? Jump in & get the Tudor
|
16 December 2008, 07:44 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
The Sub, and for an M series a great price (assuming that the condition is also good). The Tudor Chrono is overpriced (probably so, because of lack of availability here in the US). A BNIB Tudor Chrono could be had for around $2200-$2300 USD at AD's Hong Kong (I know, because I shopped for one last year and received quotes from 3 AD's).
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
16 December 2008, 07:54 AM | #15 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
|
Well get the Tudor since you want the Daytona but cant stand no date.
You will be very happy and 9 years is nothing.... If you don't take it please EMail me the sellers info! The more I look at it the more I want one now and like the date feature. The Sub is a HECK of a deal as well and I dont agree that its like the GMT IIC
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun |
16 December 2008, 07:58 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 16610 1675 Speedy
Posts: 1,057
|
Good price on the Sub Date. I'd go for that.
__________________
|
16 December 2008, 09:28 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Buz
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam
Posts: 5,108
|
Tudor chrono for sure. Picking this one up Wednesday. If it's recently serviced you have a great chrono with the date.
__________________
Buz The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis |
16 December 2008, 09:48 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
Sub Date!
|
16 December 2008, 09:50 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
I would get the Sub!
|
16 December 2008, 09:55 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
Sub by a mile, I have no interest in the tudor line.
__________________
My grails: |
16 December 2008, 09:55 AM | #21 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
Quote:
Definitively Tudor chrono but not at the overpriced number you cited. Look around and you can get it cheaper. I bought one BNIB with b/p for I think it was $2100 or $2200. Its like having a Daytona but better because you have an extra 7-8k still in your pocket and it has the date!! Good luck my friend. |
|
16 December 2008, 09:58 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Earth
Watch: 114060
Posts: 3,203
|
Given these two I vote for the sub. Since you have the GMTIIc why not get a TOG or a different style?? Why 2 sport models that are pretty similar? Just my .02
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
16 December 2008, 12:30 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,596
|
Sub all the way!!!!!
__________________
______________________________ You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again. |
16 December 2008, 12:35 PM | #24 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
An M-series SS Sub-date for just $3900? Whoa!! Too good to be true!! GRAB IT - with both hands and feet!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
16 December 2008, 01:11 PM | #25 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Oscar
Location: Florida
Watch: Me!!!
Posts: 23,233
|
Quote:
__________________
|
16 December 2008, 01:31 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
If the two are almost the same price then I'd say go for the Sub. However, I agree with someone else here who said the Tudor is overpriced, so if you can get it for say under $2,500 then I'd go for the Tudor.
|
16 December 2008, 01:32 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Andy
Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY
Watch: Me Watching You!!
Posts: 3,260
|
I would go for the Sub date
|
16 December 2008, 06:13 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Jackson
Location: So. California
Posts: 2,893
|
Sub for me.
__________________
Jackson |
16 December 2008, 06:30 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: WXSW
Watch: GMT (116710)
Posts: 2,723
|
My vote is for the Submariner. Good luck!
__________________
-Cheers, Chris #15,634 "The heart of the discerning acquires knowledge; the ears of the wise seek it out." |
16 December 2008, 06:39 PM | #30 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
THAT Tudor.
__________________
E |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.