ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
21 June 2018, 12:27 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
Sub C more special than the SD4K ???
What are your thoughts ?
Sub C ND or Date more special than the SD4K Ceramic or non ceramic ? Comparing 40 mm only not the SD43 50Th... Both classic looking and very versatile as well what do you guys think which is classier and Best all round ? |
21 June 2018, 12:30 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,754
|
My favorite Rolex is my 16600 and 116600. I bought a 116610 as a daily beater because I didn’t want to daily the sea dwellers but wanted a date function. So, since I bought the 116610 I would say the sea dwellers are more special to me. It’s hard to find nice condition 16600 as from everything I have read were produced in smaller numbers and we already know how short the production was on the sd4k. So I figured it would be easier to replace a 116610 compared to the others.
|
21 June 2018, 12:30 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
|
SD4k has proper lines.
do it |
21 June 2018, 12:51 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
Indeed. You really should. YES YES YES!
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
21 June 2018, 12:39 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
I don't think any Rolex divers are more special than the next, but mostly because they're all amazing. If I could have only 1 it would be the Sub Date LN. I think it's the most versatile and best all around with it's gloss dial, slimmer case (for fitting under cuffs), and date the most useful complication for majority of collections.
|
21 June 2018, 12:50 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Neither.
If I had to pick a modern Subbish model, I would say the 16660 or 116660 |
21 June 2018, 01:04 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
|
To me, the SD4K is more unique and special. It has better proportions and is less common than your SS sub. I actually traded in my Sub for an SD43 because I felt the SD was more special and unique. I think I would have made the same decision for the SD4K, though it might have been a slightly harder decision because of some of the similarities.
|
21 June 2018, 01:06 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: HMFIC
Location: Ubiquitous
Watch: Rollie’s and JLC
Posts: 415
|
Best all-around a.k.a GATA is and always always be the Sub.
Now the thread can be closed;) |
21 June 2018, 01:07 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: VA, USA
Watch: 16753
Posts: 35
|
Always thought the SD4K looked better proportioned than the broad shouldered Sub-C, and the lack of cyclops allows you to have a date without nearly as much visual asymmetry on the dial.
|
21 June 2018, 01:07 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 76
|
Couldn't get over the lugs on the sub and it was never comfortable for me. The SD4k on the other hand feels really comfortable. Oh and I couldn't get use to not having a date.
|
21 June 2018, 01:14 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
I can't see me ever getting an SD4K now. Fantastic looking watch. Anyone who can should.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
21 June 2018, 01:32 PM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 934
|
Seadwellers are always better than Subs.......
|
21 June 2018, 01:34 PM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: shannon
Location: usa
Posts: 9,211
|
I’ve owned all of the above...hands down the SD4k is my favorite and one I still own.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
21 June 2018, 09:30 PM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
|
|
21 June 2018, 01:46 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Ted
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 383
|
The very short production run, the domed crystal, the date but no cyclops, the matte dial, the smaller lugs, the minute markers all around and the engraved back make the SD4K more special to me, but there is no wrong in the Sub C either.
__________________
Instagram : @ted_watches ...Done flipping and changing....... (never...) |
5 July 2018, 08:25 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Netherlands/Spain
Watch: Sea-Dweller 116600
Posts: 1,030
|
Quote:
Double this!
__________________
Rolex.c6 Sea-Dweller 4000 SD4K Ref. 116600 |
|
21 June 2018, 02:05 PM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
I think they're both incredible, and incredibly classic. My head and heart want to lean towards the SD4K, but in reality my wrist wasn't feeling it. I've tried it on several times with intent to buy and every time I was disappointed in how it looked and felt on the wrist.
While I do love the context of the watch (discounted model, slimmer lugs, no cyclops) how it looks and feels on the wrist is the most important thing to me, as I believe it should be to you too. |
21 June 2018, 02:12 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,424
|
SD4K ftw ........
__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE |
21 June 2018, 02:31 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,823
|
Nope. Sea-Dwellers are better. You know what's better than a Sea-Dweller? Two Sea-Dwellers.
|
21 June 2018, 02:35 PM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Tampa
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 2,674
|
I think they are both absolutely gorgeous and i had the same dilemma last year.
Ultimately, decided that i can buy a SubC any day (well almost any day) but the SD4K was more rare and harder to get, especially BNIB, so i went with that and haven't looked back. if i had unlimited disposable funds, i would have one of each.
__________________
Sea-Dweller 116600 - the manly one GMT II 16710 - the manly one Daytona 116500 - the manly-womanly one Yacht-Master 268622 - the chick version Speedy Mitsukoshi <3 Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAF141C.BA0824 - the chick version Thank you logan5tx!!! Have to link it. Too long for the signature. https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...0&postcount=14 |
21 June 2018, 03:34 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Niki
Location: UK
Watch: Too many
Posts: 837
|
Hard to say which is best, as I’d guess it’d be different for different people. For me, I prefer the SD4K due to its proportions and uniqueness. I finally acted upon my preference yesterday by trading in both my SubC ND and BLNR (with cash back!) to get the SD.
As a side point, my head always wanted the SubC date but when I went to purchase one the ND won me over due to its cleanser more symmetrical appearance. I feel that the SD retains this symmetry very well whilst also adding in the date too. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
21 June 2018, 04:00 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Netherlands/Spain
Watch: Sea-Dweller 116600
Posts: 1,030
|
All divers have proven to be great watches. I think the 116600 is just a bit more special than the 116610 or the 114610. It's seen a lot less and has a shorter production run, the thinner lugs are a plus for a lot of people. Of course the lack of the cyclops is a bit special. Th thickness of the case isn't loved by everybody though.
Overall I would choose the SD4K!
__________________
Rolex.c6 Sea-Dweller 4000 SD4K Ref. 116600 |
21 June 2018, 04:07 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Jim
Location: Asia
Watch: Deepsea Sea Blue
Posts: 75
|
I agree. SD4k is my favorite watch in my collection.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
21 June 2018, 04:11 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Genaro
Location: Fresno Ca.
Watch: R O L E X
Posts: 4,466
|
They are all awesome. Just wished they moved the date window to the right..
|
22 June 2018, 12:04 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
You can definitely tell sharing same layout as the Sub Date window on the dial, but those on Subs are purposely aligned this way to account for cyclops magnification. The SD is kind of quirky but cool in its own right
|
21 June 2018, 04:17 PM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Cy
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 516
|
Love the Sub
Might be more common but overall its the most iconic Rolex, thickness ,weight good ratio Thats the one I would go for Surely its up to you and how you can manage each one taking into consideration Your wrist sz etc |
21 June 2018, 04:22 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 374
|
It’s all subjective, no one is more special.
Buy what you prefer. I prefer the Submariner Date, so personally, I would buy that. |
21 June 2018, 05:13 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
|
Sleep easy Mario. Your SD4K is more special than a Sub. Dwellers just are.
For a whole host of reasons, many of which cannot be simply explained It’s also much better looking
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
21 June 2018, 05:15 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 514
|
Have both, sd4k is more special
__________________
116515LN - 116600 SD4K - 116710BLNR Batman - 116610LV Hulk - 16013 Datejust - 116500LN Black - 116500LN White - 126710BLRO Pepsi Jubilee - 126610LV - 126710BLRO Pepsi Oyster - Hublot Bigbang Unico - 226570 Polar |
21 June 2018, 05:21 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Watch: 114060
Posts: 22
|
I agree, the proportions on the SD are better than the Sub...plus no cyclops! The SD just looked too big on my wrist
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.