ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

bruinmd · 17 July 2018, 01:39 PM

.......I came across this list and wanted to share it.

It's more of a grouping than ranking the watches in any particular order. I think it's actually a pretty accurate list for the most part.

Enjoy:

https://www.watch-rankings.com/watch-rankings/

bruinmd · 18 July 2018, 01:52 AM

One more thing (that I know is obvious to most here): the hierarchy within the groups.
For example, within the high end luxury group, AP, PP, A Lange and Suhn and Breguet all sit higher than JLC, GO, Piaget, Blancpain, etc.

Ditto for the luxury group--> Rolex, IWC, Panerai > Breitling and Omega.

leooooo · 18 July 2018, 02:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bruinmd

One more thing (that I know is obvious to most here): the hierarchy within the groups.
For example, within the high end luxury group, AP, PP, A Lange and Suhn and Breguet all sit higher than JLC, GO, Piaget, Blancpain, etc.

Ditto for the luxury group--> Rolex, IWC, Panerai > Breitling and Omega.

Rolex, IWC > Omega, Panerai > Breitling

;)

bruinmd · 18 July 2018, 03:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leooooo

Rolex, IWC > Omega, Panerai > Breitling

;)

lol-- fair enough, although I don't know that I agree that IWC is still > Panerai. I think 15 years ago-- definitely.

guycord · 18 July 2018, 05:44 AM

Rolex > omega > IWC > Breitling > Panerai

See nothing special in Panerai apart from their prices.

air_king · 18 July 2018, 05:59 AM

I think breitling is now at the bottom of that list. The quality of their watches is no where near rolex or even omega

supersam80 · 18 July 2018, 07:18 AM

Pointless list imo

Even within brands it varies so much. Eg I rate a Portugieser tourbillon in term of HH over anything rolex does. But I would rate a datejust over an iwc with an eta or sellita movement

rominvicta · 18 July 2018, 03:42 PM

LOL a lot of mistakes inside, needless to speak this so-called grouping is done on basis of what? Prices, personal appreciation or something else? Even the grouping of Watchtime is artificial though based or at least tried doing so, on some objective criteria.

SearChart · 18 July 2018, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by air_king

I think breitling is now at the bottom of that list. The quality of their watches is no where near rolex or even omega

I'd actually place Breitling above Omega.

minute_man · 18 July 2018, 04:52 PM

Yet another arbitrary list imho. I do appreciate the effort putting it together and the OP sharing with us though.

DasKptl · 18 July 2018, 05:15 PM

What about "Watch Rankings in terms of Value Retention"?

I think Rolex would be the 1st, being followed by Patek as the 2nd. They generally have a much better resale value than all others, as you all know.

But what would be the 3rd? Would it be Audemars? Omega?

And what would be the 4th? The 5th?

17 July 2018, 01:39 PM	#1
bruinmd "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Sal Location: Las Vegas Watch: Patek/Rolex/GS Posts: 1,096	Watch rankings/groupings...... .......I came across this list and wanted to share it. It's more of a grouping than ranking the watches in any particular order. I think it's actually a pretty accurate list for the most part. Enjoy: https://www.watch-rankings.com/watch-rankings/

18 July 2018, 01:52 AM	#2
bruinmd "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Sal Location: Las Vegas Watch: Patek/Rolex/GS Posts: 1,096	One more thing (that I know is obvious to most here): the hierarchy within the groups. For example, within the high end luxury group, AP, PP, A Lange and Suhn and Breguet all sit higher than JLC, GO, Piaget, Blancpain, etc. Ditto for the luxury group--> Rolex, IWC, Panerai > Breitling and Omega.

18 July 2018, 05:44 AM	#5
guycord "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2018 Location: UK Posts: 41	Rolex > omega > IWC > Breitling > Panerai See nothing special in Panerai apart from their prices.

18 July 2018, 05:59 AM	#6
air_king "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2016 Location: US Posts: 383	I think breitling is now at the bottom of that list. The quality of their watches is no where near rolex or even omega

18 July 2018, 07:18 AM	#7
supersam80 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Location: Melb, Australia Watch: 116710LN, 26331ST Posts: 298	Pointless list imo Even within brands it varies so much. Eg I rate a Portugieser tourbillon in term of HH over anything rolex does. But I would rate a datejust over an iwc with an eta or sellita movement

18 July 2018, 03:42 PM	#8
rominvicta 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2017 Location: EU Watch: DSSD, BLNR, SM, GM Posts: 933	LOL a lot of mistakes inside, needless to speak this so-called grouping is done on basis of what? Prices, personal appreciation or something else? Even the grouping of Watchtime is artificial though based or at least tried doing so, on some objective criteria.

18 July 2018, 04:52 PM	#10
minute_man 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Real Name: Basil Location: Athens, GR Watch: BoctokKomandirskie Posts: 2,881	Yet another arbitrary list imho. I do appreciate the effort putting it together and the OP sharing with us though.

18 July 2018, 05:15 PM	#11
DasKptl Banned Join Date: Jun 2018 Location: Chicago Posts: 378	What about "Watch Rankings in terms of Value Retention"? I think Rolex would be the 1st, being followed by Patek as the 2nd. They generally have a much better resale value than all others, as you all know. But what would be the 3rd? Would it be Audemars? Omega? And what would be the 4th? The 5th?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)