The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 August 2018, 06:39 AM   #1
Lz4000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 116
BLRO vs BLNR launch

I need your insights please.

I’m on a few lists for the BLRO SS but don’t expect to receive it any time soon.
However I was asking myself. Was the hype similar when the BLNR hit the market back in 2013? Meaning a few crazy 1 or 2 years before the waiting time reaches a “healthy” 6-12 months?

I was not following the prices and interests in that model back then as I am today. But I am sure a lot of you guys did and can compare it to today’s situation.
Lz4000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 06:44 AM   #2
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
absolutely not even close. The BLRO launch was even bigger than the Daytona C launch. Without making any subjective judgments on the watches (although i prefer the BLRO) its undeniable that watch market for hot watches is in a completely different place today, so its not even a comparison.

Daytona C waitlists absolutely didn't close within 24 hours. BLRO lists did at a lot of AD's.

... so if its bigger initially than the Daytona its way bigger than the BLNR
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 06:48 AM   #3
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
absolutely not even close. The BLRO launch was even bigger than the Daytona C launch. Not making any judgments on the watches (although i prefer the BLRO) but the watch market for hot watches is in a completely different place so its not even a comparison.

Daytona C waitlists absolutely didn't close within 24 hours. BLRO lists did at a lot of AD's.


Completely agree. It’s a whole different watch world right now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 06:48 AM   #4
037
2024 Pledge Member
 
037's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lz4000 View Post
Meaning a few crazy 1 or 2 years before the waiting time reaches a “healthy” 6-12 months?
The BLRO hasn't been out long enough to know what the supply is going to look like. Trying to predict it now is impossible. Some larger ADs have received at least 2 or 3 already. We just think supply is small due to the constant complaint threads and people told that they're "first" when in reality they might not be.

But, demand is higher now than ever. That's a fact.
037 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 06:52 AM   #5
kauffee
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,385
I would disagree with Tyler and say the launches of the SS BLRO and Daytona C felt about the same for me. With both watches it was essentially the excitement of the ceramic bezel coming to a SS model. With the Daytona C it was expected, of course, and I'd say with the SS BLRO it was a bit of a surprise. But the hype for the watches feels about the same.

The big difference is that the BLRO is launching in an environment of complete scarcity of professional models. So the usual hype and clamor (and gray market prices) seem magnified because you can't get any SS watch, much less the hottest new release.
kauffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 06:52 AM   #6
Fat_ninja
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: USA
Watch: P-01
Posts: 11,772
Anyone offered a BLRO should take it. Whats funny is all those people that complained about
1) rasberry
2) end link
3) jubilee


It has mass appeal and limited alternatives/substitutes... the substitutes are even hard to get.
Fat_ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 06:56 AM   #7
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauffee View Post
I would disagree with Tyler and say the launches of the SS BLRO and Daytona C felt about the same for me. With both watches it was essentially the excitement of the ceramic bezel coming to a SS model. With the Daytona C it was expected, of course, and I'd say with the SS BLRO it was a bit of a surprise. But the hype for the watches feels about the same.

The big difference is that the BLRO is launching in an environment of complete scarcity of professional models. So the usual hype and clamor (and gray market prices) seem magnified because you can't get any SS watch, much less the hottest new release.
ive always said the Daytona will always be the more in demand watch long term (and im not a SS Daytona fan) but I have never seen anything like what happened in the two or three days after Basel.

I happened to be in my AD a day or two after and he said he phone hadn't stopped ringing. The daytona was a steady stream of interest but the BLRO was like a bomb going off at once. Daytona will win the race though.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 06:59 AM   #8
Lz4000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
Daytona will win the race though.
It always will bc I think supply is even more limited compared to all other SS models
Lz4000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 06:59 AM   #9
kauffee
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
ive always said the Daytona will always be the more in demand watch long term (and im not a SS Daytona fan) but I have never seen anything like what happened in the two or three days after Basel.

I happened to be in my AD a day or two after and he said he phone hadn't stopped ringing. The daytona was a steady stream of interest but the BLRO was like a bomb going off at once. Daytona will win the race though.
Yeah I'd believe that. Rolex demand just seems crazy right now. More people than ever seem to be paying attention.

Or maybe all the people who were still on the 116520 lists just assumed they'd be transferred to the 116500 lists and didn't bother to call =)
kauffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 07:00 AM   #10
037
2024 Pledge Member
 
037's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
The market seems to be far more saturated with flippers now than in 2016 or 2013. Lists are larger for everything that's hard to get.
037 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 07:01 AM   #11
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lz4000 View Post
It always will bc I think supply is even more limited compared to all other SS models
the GMT isnt a popular complication where as a chrono seems to be, even if supply is the same. More people chose a sub c vs a GMT LN for example. They look almost the same to be honest and the GMT has an added complication. People still buy the sub.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 07:26 AM   #12
kauffee
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
the GMT isnt a popular complication where as a chrono seems to be, even if supply is the same.
I’ve always wondered why chronos were so popular. My theory is that it’s a complication you can interact with. Even a GMT, you just set the hands and look at it. But with a chrono you can push buttons and people love pushing buttons.
kauffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 07:29 AM   #13
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauffee View Post
I’ve always wondered why chronos were so popular. My theory is that it’s a complication you can interact with. Even a GMT, you just set the hands and look at it. But with a chrono you can push buttons and people love pushing buttons.
I sort of get the idea of playing with a chrono as being interactive, and it looks interesting with the subdials so it makes sense. What i will never understand is the GMT vs Sub thing. WR is irrelevant so it functionally cant be that as to why the sub is the default watch for so many.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 07:29 AM   #14
Lz4000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauffee View Post
I’ve always wondered why chronos were so popular. My theory is that it’s a complication you can interact with. Even a GMT, you just set the hands and look at it. But with a chrono you can push buttons and people love pushing buttons.
Except for the Daytona it would mean unscrew buttons. Push buttons. Screw buttons in again
Lz4000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 07:30 AM   #15
kauffee
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lz4000 View Post
Except for the Daytona it would mean unscrew buttons. Push buttons. Screw buttons in again


Ugh tell me about it.
kauffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 07:43 AM   #16
Lz4000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
I sort of get the idea of playing with a chrono as being interactive, and it looks interesting with the subdials so it makes sense. What i will never understand is the GMT vs Sub thing. WR is irrelevant so it functionally cant be that as to why the sub is the default watch for so many.
99% can more or less easily identify a sub to be a Rolex. They just see them more often than any other model out there.
Whenever they are in a financial situation and decide to get a Rolex it’s the model they consider the only “real” Rolex. Not thinking of complications, history or even what the instrument was actually made for.
They will just be happy that other people will easily know they have a Rolex now. And then the whole thing repeats over and over again.
Lz4000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 08:06 AM   #17
Seaswirl
"TRF" Member
 
Seaswirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,761
The BLRO is much harder to obtain at its release than the BLNR, but I think it has more to do with the current scarcity of ss sport models than the desirability of the BLRO. The DaytonaC though seemed to be even more in demand than the BLRO upon release.
Seaswirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 08:07 AM   #18
denmanproject
"TRF" Member
 
denmanproject's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Wayne
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,407
The insanity increases every year
denmanproject is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 08:10 AM   #19
Helmi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Doha
Posts: 2,065
I personally like the look of the 3 subdials on the chrono watches. Add to that the contrast in color (e.g. The panda look or the silver rings on the black) and the design becomes much more appealing to me. Regarding sub vs. Black GMT, I think the reason the black GMT is not popular is the fact that there has always been "iconic" GMTs around such as the Pepsi, coke, root beer...etc, but for the sub, black has always been the iconic color
Helmi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 08:12 AM   #20
g_luck
"TRF" Member
 
g_luck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 104
The US economy is doing very well. Next downturn in the economy and you will be able to get any Rolex within a reasonable amount of time. I personally know several people who are wearing Rolexes that literally can't afford health insurance but buy the watch anyway. I could be wrong....only time will tell.
g_luck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 08:13 AM   #21
Navarino
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 3,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauffee View Post
The big difference is that the BLRO is launching in an environment of complete scarcity of professional models. So the usual hype and clamor (and gray market prices) seem magnified because you can't get any SS watch, much less the hottest new release.
This is the key. Comparing the BLNR (or Daytona) announcement reception to the BLRO is an apples and oranges comparison.

Hate to sound like such a simpleton here, but this really boils down to basic supply and demand...

1. Demand continues grow. On a macroeconomic level, we've been full steam ahead with engines roaring out of the last crisis. While there has been plenty of noise in the stock market over the past 2 years, we've been generally more and more in the green as time elapses in this run. If you don't trust that as a barometer, look elsewhere. U.S. consumer savings rates have decreased to 3.1% of disposable income (down from ~5.5% about the time the Daytona C was first announced). U.S. auto volumes aren't slowing down after already reaching all-time highs (one of the companies our firm owns is a Tier 1 OEM supplier; we track this data very closely). List goes on and on regarding people just spending more money relative to a few years ago.

Forget the hard-to-get flashy new Rolex models for a second. I guarantee you the demand for a standard Sub is higher today than it was when the DaytonaC or BLNR were announced. A rising tide lifts all the boats -- so this general growth in demand is only further magnifying the issue with popular models.

2. Supply constraints on SS professional models. I obviously can't throw statistics around on this, but from the collective anecdotal information on this forum (regarding availability, wait-lists, "my AD told me..", etc.) it just sounds like ADs are getting less of SS sports models that we all love. I highly doubt Rolex is producing less professional line watches on an absolute basis (i.e., X subs in 2018 is less than Y subs in 2017), but clearly there is a noticeable disconnect and supply growth is being outpaced by demand growth at an increasing rate. If they actually are producing less on an absolute basis, that disconnect grows larger.

If you tried to normalize for these differences, my guess would be the BLRO has had a very similar level of positive reception/demand to the Daytona C. The higher grey prices (higher asking prices on an absolute basis and much higher on a relative/% of MSRP basis) than the Daytona is probably due more so to the issues outlined above rather than it being a more "popular" or "wanted" watch.

I wasn't tracking watches or the industry as closely when the BLNR was first announced. I'm sure others can add much more color on that one. From some of what I've seen here on threads though, it almost sounds like that watch had mixed-reception initially (regardless of the "new" factor) and was one you could pull out straight from an AD's display case for awhile (i.e., it was never like the Daytona C).
Navarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 11:03 AM   #22
JSL420
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Asia
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauffee View Post
I’ve always wondered why chronos were so popular. My theory is that it’s a complication you can interact with. Even a GMT, you just set the hands and look at it. But with a chrono you can push buttons and people love pushing buttons.
For some, a Chronograph is a useful tool, yes you can time with your iPhone and submariner bezel, but a push of button is MUCH easier and discreet (even with screwed down pusher) than the bezel and iPhone app. I do use the Chronograph quite often and I believe others too
JSL420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 11:46 AM   #23
gccmd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
ive always said the Daytona will always be the more in demand watch long term (and im not a SS Daytona fan) but I have never seen anything like what happened in the two or three days after Basel.

I happened to be in my AD a day or two after and he said he phone hadn't stopped ringing. The daytona was a steady stream of interest but the BLRO was like a bomb going off at once. Daytona will win the race though.
Exactly
gccmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 11:48 AM   #24
Spoonage
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,133
Don't recall when the BLNR came out, but I got mine Q3 2014... walked into an AD, 1st purchase from them (at discount) walked out with it. Long way to answer that the landscape was completely different...

BLNR Available at discount from AD --> BLRO Not available from AD and > 2x MSRP from Grey...
Spoonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 12:24 PM   #25
lenfried29
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Far Far Away
Watch: tick-tock
Posts: 1,206
BLRO released at the different time then BLNR. The market for SS models was already short. According to my AD BLRO is more desirable than Daytona C at the moment.
lenfried29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 02:14 PM   #26
nyc2la
"TRF" Member
 
nyc2la's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spoonage View Post
Don't recall when the BLNR came out, but I got mine Q3 2014... walked into an AD, 1st purchase from them (at discount) walked out with it. Long way to answer that the landscape was completely different...

BLNR Available at discount from AD --> BLRO Not available from AD and > 2x MSRP from Grey...


Similar story for me as well. In August 2014, I walked into an AD in a major city and got to choose between the BLNR and the SDc. Both were available in the case. Times were different back then.
__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE
nyc2la is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 05:19 PM   #27
Lz4000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyc2la View Post
Similar story for me as well. In August 2014, I walked into an AD in a major city and got to choose between the BLNR and the SDc. Both were available in the case. Times were different back then.
Interesting. Seems like it’s
Availability = Rolex supply policy x global economic situation x desirability of particular model

All factors leading to the BLRO situation today
Lz4000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 06:51 PM   #28
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
absolutely not even close. The BLRO launch was even bigger than the Daytona C launch. Without making any subjective judgments on the watches (although i prefer the BLRO) its undeniable that watch market for hot watches is in a completely different place today, so its not even a comparison.

Daytona C waitlists absolutely didn't close within 24 hours. BLRO lists did at a lot of AD's.

... so if its bigger initially than the Daytona its way bigger than the BLNR
X2
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 07:40 PM   #29
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
The genuine demand for the D500 and BLRO is very similar but the flipper demand for the BLRO is so much higher as the market is hyped up now. BLNR was a pretty normal release.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2018, 08:08 PM   #30
glamorama
"TRF" Member
 
glamorama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Dan
Location: Benelux
Posts: 1,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauffee View Post
I’ve always wondered why chronos were so popular. My theory is that it’s a complication you can interact with. Even a GMT, you just set the hands and look at it. But with a chrono you can push buttons and people love pushing buttons.
I think most Daytona owners never use the chrono from what I've heard.

Chrono's that appeal to me usually have a racing heritage. My first 'nice' watch was a Tag Heuer just because I associated it with racing (unfortunately stolen now).

Chrono's are also associated with other cool mechanical and manly things like fighter planes/pilots. The coolest chrono in this category for me personally would be a Swedish Air Force military issued Lemania "Viggen".

GMT is also a pilot's watch but more for the sophisticated traveller imao.
glamorama is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.