ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 August 2018, 10:47 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Georgia
Posts: 57
|
Go for a 14060? Save up for a 5513?
Getting ready to get my first Rolex. What’s more iconic than a sub. Now the question is should I get an unpolished 14060 before it becomes hard to find? Or should I save up for a 5513?
|
23 August 2018, 10:50 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
|
Always wait and get exactly what you want. Never settle. It only brings regret.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter |
23 August 2018, 11:12 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
|
Pleasure is in the pursuit not the attainment of a goal. Save for the 5513.
What type do you want? As you know there's a vast window of price / rarity. |
23 August 2018, 11:15 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Hong kong
Posts: 148
|
14060 if you are getting the ones post 1998 the parts should be readily available from RSC for a while. 5513 you need to take service cost and hassle into consideration. That’s what is on my mind whenever I see nice 5513 example.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
23 August 2018, 11:21 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
|
This wouldn't be a factor if I wanted a 5513.
Service cost is the same and parts haven't been an issue. The 5513 is very durable and generally trouble free. The only sub I own that I don't wear often is my 5508. |
23 August 2018, 11:24 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Georgia
Posts: 57
|
I feel if I had a 5513 I’d be scared to wear it. Do RSC service vintage watches?
|
23 August 2018, 11:33 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Hong kong
Posts: 148
|
Quote:
Sadly Where I am at 5513 matching tritium hands and bezel insert and pearls don’t come cheap. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
23 August 2018, 11:36 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
|
Life is too short to be afraid of hurting a watch. These are tough.
Don't buy something you won't wear - but if the 5513 makes you happy then get that. The big issue is price - huge delta. I don't dive in my 5513s but I wear them all the time. Check out this site to learn more about the 5513 - not all are equal: http://5513mattedial.com |
23 August 2018, 11:37 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Jersey
Watch: GMT
Posts: 54
|
awesome
|
23 August 2018, 11:37 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Hong kong
Posts: 148
|
Quote:
Agreed on all counts Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
23 August 2018, 11:38 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
|
Correct. A nice insert is expensive everywhere. I am assuming you will buy a correct one and not have to "build one" ...
But maybe you find a nice MK4/5 Maxi or one of the last 5513 gloss dials (after the maxi) - it should be correct and stable to wear for years. |
24 August 2018, 12:18 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Georgia
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
|
|
24 August 2018, 01:24 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Georgia
Posts: 57
|
|
24 August 2018, 01:28 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Watch: AP||Panerai||Rolex
Posts: 759
|
|
24 August 2018, 01:29 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Hong kong
Posts: 148
|
That is part of the fun!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
24 August 2018, 01:33 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
|
People who want a 5513 generally want it because it has things like a domed plexiglass crystal, generally a matte dial, thicker font on the inserts, etc. It's "vintage" ...
The 14060 is (roughly) what's next in line newer. It's newer but lacking the above. |
24 August 2018, 01:39 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Georgia
Posts: 57
|
What got me the most is probably the vintage design and classic James Bond factor.
|
24 August 2018, 04:23 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
For me it would be all about the condition of the individual watch
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
24 August 2018, 05:01 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 739
|
Probably cost a lot more money in the long run as well.
__________________
Seiko RAF Gen 1 Chrono Black Bay Red Submariner 114060 Daytona 116520 |
24 August 2018, 05:17 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
|
Decided a late model 14060M has some improvements while the same heritage.
how I spent my money |
24 August 2018, 05:51 AM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
I would choose the 14060 for being more practical in everyday use.
|
24 August 2018, 07:09 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Georgia
Posts: 57
|
|
24 August 2018, 07:18 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
|
|
24 August 2018, 08:39 AM | #24 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
This 1989 5513 with service dial and hands works as a daily and a diver.
__________________
_______________________ |
24 August 2018, 08:56 AM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
Go for a 14060? Save up for a 5513?
Quote:
All variations of 5513 r never fancy nor rare, but it’s the one watch that represents vintage Rolex sports model more than others. It’s so iconic, pretty much most of today’s divers is another variation of it. It will never go out of fashion n always in demand, hence the collectibility. Regardless of vintage, a really nice one with all original age appropriate parts is approaching $20k. Personally I would get a 14060 to wear and save up for a 5513. In today’s market, it’s tough to catch up to the keep increasing price. I blame it on autoconnect. |
|
24 August 2018, 10:48 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Georgia
Posts: 57
|
|
24 August 2018, 10:51 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
|
24 August 2018, 10:52 AM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
|
|
24 August 2018, 10:55 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
|
pic time
|
24 August 2018, 11:05 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,172
|
I'd say go for a 2 liner 14060m it's the most modern and tough of the 5 digits while still appearing vintage but maybe go for a 14060 with tritium T>25 so it will patina and both are still much less than a 5513
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.