ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 November 2018, 08:32 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2
|
Is it good enough to buy a Rolex based on a good timegrapher result?
Hi,
I need some advice on which watch to get or none at all. I found 2 pre-owned Rolex Explorers 114270 from 2002 (Y-Series, Box and Paper only, 12 links) and 2005 (D-Series, full set including original purchase receipt), the result on the timegrapher on a quick test (about a minute or less) was: (2002) +0-2 sec/day (it fluctuated so I can't be sure), Amplitude 307, I forgot the Beat Error; (2005) +3 sec/day, Amplitude 297, Beat Error 0.5. Both watches are in good condition and lightly polished. Both shops couldn't tell me the service history and I don't think they did any pressure test. I suspect they didn't do any servicing/cleaning because Y-Series Shop said good timegrapher result = good condition and the other shop just didn't give me a straight answer. Both shops are reputable where I live (Y-Series shop has more referrals) while the other has been in business for decades. I think most people buy for the aesthetics only and are not too concerned with the history or performance. The Y-Series shop gives 2-years warranty with a buy back option and the D-Series shop gives a year on their watches without buy back option. The price difference is about USD$730. Are timegrapher results good enough to buy the watch given the shops don't know the service history? Also is it worth it to pay $700+ more for a full set but slightly poorer condition watch? The little reservation I had for the full set D-Series was the shop quoted me two different prices when I asked them a month apart, and didn't answer my questions directly (especially service history), and in some cases no answer. They gave me a wheeler dealer vibe for some reason. I hope you guys can help. |
27 November 2018, 10:11 PM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,759
|
You are too much concerned with the mechanics. It's totally irrelevant because a service will fix any problem easily.
Focus on condition of case, dial and bracelet. I'd never buy a lesser watch in favour of a full set. I would want both, good watch and complete set and continue to search
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
28 November 2018, 12:21 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
I'll be honest. I don't know any of the performance numbers you've quoted on any of the watches I own.
So, I'm not sure what to tell you. As stated above, I would be looking for a good watch in excellent condition with a full set. Good luck, |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.