ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 December 2018, 06:36 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: London
Posts: 57
|
Which AP to add?
Hi
I am considering getting a Royal Oak next but am undecided as to which reference to add as whilst I like the 15202 it wears quite large (almost borderline for my 6.75 wrist) and the size combined with the many reflecting surfaces makes it almost feel a bit flashy to me and hence I am also considering a 14790 as it’s an elegant watch in that size but downside of that is that I prefer to buy something new and 14790 feels just a tiny bit small and obviously it’s not the size of the original (I don’t like the 15450 due to its thickness). For reference, current collection consists of PP 5167, Vacheron 47101 in yellow gold, Rolex GMT II and a speedmaster (vacheron and PP gets almost all the wrist time these days) Appreciate your thoughts! Erik Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
6 December 2018, 07:22 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,406
|
I think a 15202 should wear very well on your wrist.
|
6 December 2018, 07:39 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: London
Posts: 57
|
It does fit well but quite big (maybe I’m getting too used with the nimble 5167 and 37mm VC) and part of the thinking is that if it’s a bit more on the elegant side it will be more likely I use it alongside the aquanaut and the vacheron as my Rolex is currently not getting much time as too similar (steel sport) but not as amazing as the aquanaut and whilst I like to have a few watches I don’t want to have ones lying around not used just for the sake of collecting. Will try and find some old pictures with 15202 and 14790 respectively Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
6 December 2018, 08:09 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Luxury Watches
Posts: 264
|
Pictures could sure help get better advices
|
6 December 2018, 08:15 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 386
|
the 15202 fits my 6.5 inch wrist perfectly
|
6 December 2018, 08:16 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: London
Posts: 57
|
|
6 December 2018, 08:17 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: London
Posts: 57
|
Below some photos of 15202 and 14790 on my wrist but note these are for size reference only, I would look to get the watch in steel with blue dial irrespective of what reference I go for
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
6 December 2018, 08:28 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Patek
Posts: 137
|
I would suggest to reconsider the 15450. I haven’t had any issue with the thickness; it slides under any cuff, sweatshirt, jacket, etc. with ease. And that’s after wearing my PP perpetual for over a year straight.
It’ll be easier to source than a 15202, the movement is more durable for daily wear, it’s so comfortable I honestly forget its there sometimes, and it doesn’t get in the way during any usual daily activities. Plus you can find one new pretty easily if that’s what you desire. |
6 December 2018, 08:41 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: London
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
|
|
6 December 2018, 08:56 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,660
|
Quote:
Give it another try.
__________________
Adam |
|
6 December 2018, 08:57 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 386
|
Here's a comparison for you comparing my aquanaut and jumbo on my 6.5 inch wrist, the 15202 pic is taken a bit closer so appears a bit larger relative
|
6 December 2018, 09:00 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: US
Posts: 468
|
|
6 December 2018, 09:12 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: London
Posts: 57
|
|
6 December 2018, 09:13 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: London
Posts: 57
|
Appreciate the view, as said before maybe I should give it one more try before making a final decision.
|
6 December 2018, 10:44 AM | #15 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Texas
Watch: PAM512
Posts: 333
|
Quote:
Obviously everyone has their own opinion, but to me, that 15202 looks amazing on your wrist. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
6 December 2018, 11:34 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: NYC
Watch: 5970
Posts: 1,980
|
15202 looks great!
|
6 December 2018, 03:36 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 68
|
Agree 15202! Looks great on your wrist.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
6 December 2018, 05:57 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: United States
Posts: 76
|
Go get the 15202, it would be nice on you, I got that as a birthday gift for my brother he loves it so much.
|
6 December 2018, 06:42 PM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
|
|
6 December 2018, 08:56 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Yev
Location: SG/GVA/NYC/MEL ->
Watch: AP, VC, RLX, BP
Posts: 171
|
15202 any day of the week. 15400 is way too big and as you said, I also find it’s proportions are off.
|
6 December 2018, 09:11 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 257
|
15202 looks great on your wrist!
Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk
__________________
AP 15300ST - Rolex Daytona 116500LN - Tudor BB58 - IWC Portugieser chrono IW3714 - Breitling Colt 44 |
6 December 2018, 10:27 PM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
202 looks fine on you and v similar to the 67.
|
6 December 2018, 10:30 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 244
|
The 15202 in the first photo seems to fit you well.
As another reference point, here’s my old 5167 and current 15450. 6.5” wrist Having had the 5167, the 15450 was the only model in the AP line that gave a similar feeling of “right” proportion on my wrist (and visually).
__________________
"When a man has a world in his hands, you expect to find a Rolex on his wrist." |
6 December 2018, 10:52 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
|
15202 looks awesome
|
7 December 2018, 02:27 AM | #25 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 1,899
|
The 15450 is a beautiful extremely wearable AP which sells for half the price of the 15202 and has none of the quirky movement hassles. In addition it is available with a lot of dial color variations and has a screw down crown for better water resistance.
|
7 December 2018, 03:35 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: SoCal
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 4,535
|
I agree that the 15202 looks fantastic on your wrist in the pictures! In regards to the 15450, seems you already have doubt so i really don't think trying it on again will change anything, go with whatever you like best! GOod Luck!
|
7 December 2018, 08:45 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 457
|
The 15202 looks great! I have one and it fits my 6.5-6.75" wrist perfectly. The 15450 would also be a good option and is a bit cheaper and easier to get. In my opinion, the 14790 looks terrible on your wrist -- it's too small and the proportions are all off. Remember that the Royal Oak was designed to fill up your wrist.
__________________
Instagram: @watchadmiral |
7 December 2018, 08:55 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Watch: AP||Panerai||Rolex
Posts: 759
|
Saw the photos you posted and you can't go wrong with the 15202 as it looks good on your wrist. Definitely go for it! Skip the 15450 and the 15400. 39mm is the sweet spot. I did however picked up the AP Blue Chrono 26331 recently, interesting enough the Chrono, while physically bigger than the 15400, wears smaller than the 15400. Keep us posted!
|
7 December 2018, 02:51 PM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 582
|
|
7 December 2018, 03:26 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: London
Posts: 1,365
|
I went into an AP boutique today. 41mm felt a little big and 37mm too small. Guess I have funny size wrists as I think they look great on everyone else's photos!
__________________
Once you aquire your "grail"... then what?! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.