ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Lol-x · 19 February 2009, 07:39 PM

Is the rehaute printing a feature that makes any difference to you?

Dalton · 19 February 2009, 07:40 PM

nope, but it sure is nice. Funny how your title painted a good picture in my head.

A1000 · 19 February 2009, 07:46 PM

From an aesthetic perspective yes. I personally prefer the version without the etching. As other people have said it does make it look more "blingy" and I know it's an original and a Rolex so I don't need reminding. I do, however, like the coronet etched on the glass which I think is a savvy way of protecting the brand. I also feel that the etching changes the balance of the face and therefore the look. Merely a personal preference though, I admit.

respect · 19 February 2009, 07:56 PM

i think it looks great. i love it and when purchasing one i would for sure choose one with it over one without it.

hflee55 · 19 February 2009, 07:56 PM

i prefer it without the rolexrolexrolex

DaveInLA · 19 February 2009, 08:09 PM

My Explorer is a Z and does not have it. My Sub is an M and does.

Honestly, I'd rather the Explorer have it as well, but it's such a trivial thing that it means very little to me.

Singslinger · 19 February 2009, 08:13 PM

Only insofar as it indicates the newness of the watch, ie. if I was to buy a new watch today, I would want it to be the absolute latest version and if this means it must have the inscription, then so be it.

walds11 · 19 February 2009, 08:14 PM

Nice feature, but does not matter to me.

Starwalker · 19 February 2009, 08:19 PM

its, NOT IMPORTANT, but any means...but it looks GREAT, if we go back in time to 5 years ago...and a daytona didnt have it, i wouldnt have cared, i still don,t but i kinda think its sexy, its nice....hmm...the only advantage of it not being there is u can walk into the AD and ask him for a greater discount cuz its old stock,....man i'm confused...Singslinger says it best...

Xenophon · 19 February 2009, 08:21 PM

I don't like it on the sport models but think it looks fine on the dress models

scottschoe · 19 February 2009, 08:47 PM

Doesn't matter, but it looks pretty neat.

padi56 · 19 February 2009, 08:52 PM

I personally think its very tacky but agree with serial and perhaps the model number, but just the word Rolex once on the dial is good enough for me.The most important thing with any watch is its engine and not case graffiti, or any other minor details.

bardm · 19 February 2009, 08:59 PM

Whenever I see a Rolex without it I think "old model", so yes it does matter to me.

I would never buy a Rolex without it or with the old clasp-type. I know I would have regretet it everytime I saw another Rolex with the new "features".

mixedccr · 19 February 2009, 09:06 PM

You know, i did not even realise that the ROLEXROLEXROLEX was on the DSSD ringlock, until i was using a cheap ass road directory magnification strip, trying to look for the serial number and the coronet etching. I guess its because the face of the ring lock is perpendicular to the watch face so its not that noticeable and the printing is not that distinct. However, on an angled rehaute and clear fonts, i may have a second thought.

ROLEX MAN · 19 February 2009, 09:44 PM

I think it's over the top, "ROLEX" has it's brandname on the watch enough already!

Subexplorer · 19 February 2009, 09:50 PM

Will answer the same than in other post of today about rehaute:

"My just bought Z series SD (serial 9xx,xxx) has not rehaute ring.

I prefer watches without the rehaut. Think they are more classic.
I personally feel that this was not such a good idea for Rolex to introduce this feature.

Anyway, that´s something we have to learn to live with: My four latest Rolex purchases (Explorer, Daytona, DSSD and Sub no date) all came with the rehaute ring."

And will add here:

It seems that Rolex -my beloved watch brand- has a marked tendency to "over write" and saturate their beautiful dials, with inscriptions.

I don´t like them very much!

Just compare the "clean" dial of an old model of Daytona, with present ones, or a vintage Sub no date with the present time COSC 14060m.
Which do you like most?

I guess if Rolex would put all this inscriptions, regarding de Superlative chronometer, and offcially certfied, on the back of the case, as Omega does in some models, as an example. I feel this would be more elegant, and the dial plainer and classy.

Just a personal point of view.
Regards, Abel

Kokyuryoku · 19 February 2009, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Singslinger

Only insofar as it indicates the newness of the watch, ie. if I was to buy a new watch today, I would want it to be the absolute latest version and if this means it must have the inscription, then so be it.

I agree.

buz-lh · 19 February 2009, 10:19 PM

Only two of my watches have it and honestly the only time I ever notice is if I'm looking through the camera or the loupe. Day to day I never notice it and that's fine. I could live with or without it.

K-R · 19 February 2009, 10:31 PM

Personally I pretty much like it

Sperry · 19 February 2009, 10:44 PM

I suspect my desire to see, not the Rolex-Rolex-Rolex, but the serial number,
would be tied to interest in the serial number letter prefix.

After my watch is purchased, interest in a readily-visible serial number might diminish.

That part is called the rehaute?

"Chapter ring branding" is not quite correct? It should be "rehaute-branding"?

rescue7 · 19 February 2009, 11:06 PM

I like it, actually on the DeepSea its hardly noticeable, the domed crystal distortes the angle of view making it harder to notice the rehaut.

B Square · 19 February 2009, 11:15 PM

Seldom ever notice it, but hey, kinda cool when I do see it

arkwhaler · 19 February 2009, 11:16 PM

Tacky imho. Why not put rolexrolexrolex all over the band? How much branding is enough?

rkrdr · 19 February 2009, 11:18 PM

Yes, I do like the ROLEXROLEXROLEX...It does not appear to be overtly noticeable at a quick glance, but is a nice touch under close inspection...typical of Rolex.

padi56 · 19 February 2009, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bardm

Whenever I see a Rolex without it I think "old model", so yes it does matter to me.

I would never buy a Rolex without it or with the old clasp-type. I know I would have regretet it everytime I saw another Rolex with the new "features".

Older case perhaps but model no, basically most Rolex sports and watches have changed very very little since 1989. Except for non lug hole case and biggest improvement the SEL bracelet, others are just purely cosmetic. The most important part the movement is the same in most cases as the ones from 1989. Or just slightly modified with say in-house hairspring or with the GMT slightly more precise dual time zone adjustment.

Lion · 20 February 2009, 12:06 AM

It really doesn't matter to me. If I buy a newer Rolex and it's there thats fine but if I buy an older model(but new) and it"s not there that's fine too!!!

karmatp · 20 February 2009, 12:09 AM

Doesn't make a difference to me, I could take it or leave it.

jimbo1mcm · 20 February 2009, 12:50 AM

Ilikeitilikeitilikeitilikeit

jdc · 20 February 2009, 12:52 AM

yes I do not like it

mfer · 20 February 2009, 12:57 AM

I like it as another way to identify FAKES! I voted pro RolexRolexRolex

View Poll Results: All things being equal does the ROLEXROLEXROLEX matter to you?
Yes, it is a new feature that does matter.	151	57.63%
No, it's just superfluous printing and it doesn't matter.	111	42.37%
Voters: 262. You may not vote on this poll

19 February 2009, 07:39 PM	#1
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,587	Does the ROLEXROLEXROLEX make a difference? Is the rehaute printing a feature that makes any difference to you? __________________ *Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.* ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim

19 February 2009, 07:46 PM	#3
A1000 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Adrian Location: UK Posts: 953	From an aesthetic perspective yes. I personally prefer the version without the etching. As other people have said it does make it look more "blingy" and I know it's an original and a Rolex so I don't need reminding. I do, however, like the coronet etched on the glass which I think is a savvy way of protecting the brand. I also feel that the etching changes the balance of the face and therefore the look. Merely a personal preference though, I admit. __________________ Rolex 16610LV (2007) PAM 312K (2009) PAM 292K (2009)

19 February 2009, 08:09 PM	#6
DaveInLA "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: California Posts: 336	My Explorer is a Z and does not have it. My Sub is an M and does. Honestly, I'd rather the Explorer have it as well, but it's such a trivial thing that it means very little to me. __________________ Explorer I 114270 Z-serial Submariner-date 16610 M-serial

19 February 2009, 08:14 PM	#8
walds11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Real Name: Adam Location: Philly ‘burbs Posts: 5,660	Nice feature, but does not matter to me. __________________ Adam

19 February 2009, 07:40 PM	#2
Dalton TechXpert Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Dal Location: Seattle Watch: 168000 Posts: 1,614	nope, but it sure is nice. Funny how your title painted a good picture in my head.

19 February 2009, 07:56 PM	#4
respect Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: USA Posts: 88	i think it looks great. i love it and when purchasing one i would for sure choose one with it over one without it.

19 February 2009, 07:56 PM	#5
hflee55 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Andy Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY Watch: Me Watching You!! Posts: 3,260	i prefer it without the rolexrolexrolex

19 February 2009, 08:13 PM	#7
Singslinger "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: singapore Posts: 6,424	Only insofar as it indicates the newness of the watch, ie. if I was to buy a new watch today, I would want it to be the absolute latest version and if this means it must have the inscription, then so be it.

19 February 2009, 08:19 PM	#9
Starwalker "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: aroundtheworld Watch: SS Daytona - BLACK Posts: 2,261	its, NOT IMPORTANT, but any means...but it looks GREAT, if we go back in time to 5 years ago...and a daytona didnt have it, i wouldnt have cared, i still don,t but i kinda think its sexy, its nice....hmm...the only advantage of it not being there is u can walk into the AD and ask him for a greater discount cuz its old stock,....man i'm confused...Singslinger says it best... __________________ 116520 Black - 116500 White - 116713LN - 116613LB - Panerai 389 - Chopard Mille Miglia GMT Chronograph - Chopard LUC Sport 2000 - Moser Pioneer Centre Seconds

19 February 2009, 08:21 PM	#10
Xenophon 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Xenophon Location: UK Posts: 2,728	I don't like it on the sport models but think it looks fine on the dress models __________________ The sea! The sea! Θάλαττα! θάλαττα!

19 February 2009, 08:47 PM	#11
scottschoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: CA Posts: 3,295	Doesn't matter, but it looks pretty neat. __________________ __________________

19 February 2009, 08:52 PM	#12
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 53,062	I personally think its very tacky but agree with serial and perhaps the model number, but just the word Rolex once on the dial is good enough for me.The most important thing with any watch is its engine and not case graffiti, or any other minor details. __________________ ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

19 February 2009, 08:59 PM	#13
bardm "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Bård Location: Oslo - Norway Watch: None Posts: 1,014	Whenever I see a Rolex without it I think "old model", so yes it does matter to me. I would never buy a Rolex without it or with the old clasp-type. I know I would have regretet it everytime I saw another Rolex with the new "features". __________________ Bård

19 February 2009, 09:06 PM	#14
mixedccr Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: omar Location: singapore Watch: deepsea Posts: 192	You know, i did not even realise that the ROLEXROLEXROLEX was on the DSSD ringlock, until i was using a cheap ass road directory magnification strip, trying to look for the serial number and the coronet etching. I guess its because the face of the ring lock is perpendicular to the watch face so its not that noticeable and the printing is not that distinct. However, on an angled rehaute and clear fonts, i may have a second thought.

19 February 2009, 09:44 PM	#15
ROLEX MAN 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Martin Location: Home and Away Watch: you? "YES PLEASE"! Posts: 3,718	I think it's over the top, "ROLEX" has it's brandname on the watch enough already! __________________ *it's not just about telling the time...* *happy rolexing...* I'm just a man with a passion

19 February 2009, 09:50 PM	#16
Subexplorer 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Abel Location: Down South Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 2,234	Will answer the same than in other post of today about rehaute: "My just bought Z series SD (serial 9xx,xxx) has not rehaute ring. I prefer watches without the rehaut. Think they are more classic. I personally feel that this was not such a good idea for Rolex to introduce this feature. Anyway, that´s something we have to learn to live with: My four latest Rolex purchases (Explorer, Daytona, DSSD and Sub no date) all came with the rehaute ring." And will add here: It seems that Rolex -my beloved watch brand- has a marked tendency to "over write" and saturate their beautiful dials, with inscriptions. I don´t like them very much! Just compare the "clean" dial of an old model of Daytona, with present ones, or a vintage Sub no date with the present time COSC 14060m. Which do you like most? I guess if Rolex would put all this inscriptions, regarding de Superlative chronometer, and offcially certfied, on the back of the case, as Omega does in some models, as an example. I feel this would be more elegant, and the dial plainer and classy. Just a personal point of view. Regards, Abel __________________ 50 Years of ROLEX Passion! Grail Rolex: 5508 c. 1959 "Bond" Sub.

19 February 2009, 10:19 PM	#18
buz-lh "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Buz Location: Atlanta Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam Posts: 5,108	Only two of my watches have it and honestly the only time I ever notice is if I'm looking through the camera or the loupe. Day to day I never notice it and that's fine. I could live with or without it. __________________ Buz The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis

19 February 2009, 10:31 PM	#19
K-R Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Indonesia Posts: 204	Personally I pretty much like it

19 February 2009, 10:44 PM	#20
Sperry "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Jim Location: Alpha Posts: 3,383	I suspect my desire to see, not the Rolex-Rolex-Rolex, but the serial number, would be tied to interest in the serial number letter prefix. After my watch is purchased, interest in a readily-visible serial number might diminish. That part is called the rehaute? "Chapter ring branding" is not quite correct? It should be "rehaute-branding"?

19 February 2009, 11:06 PM	#21
rescue7 Banned Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Rescueguy Location: Here Watch: DSSD Posts: 1,129	I like it, actually on the DeepSea its hardly noticeable, the domed crystal distortes the angle of view making it harder to notice the rehaut.

19 February 2009, 11:15 PM	#22
B Square "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Boyd Location: NC Posts: 1,815	Seldom ever notice it, but hey, kinda cool when I do see it __________________ 16610M 16710Z Pepsi 16570V White

19 February 2009, 11:16 PM	#23
arkwhaler Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: flyover america Watch: 114270 Posts: 236	Tacky imho. Why not put rolexrolexrolex all over the band? How much branding is enough?

19 February 2009, 11:18 PM	#24
rkrdr "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Eddie Location: GMT-6 Posts: 130	Yes, I do like the ROLEXROLEXROLEX...It does not appear to be overtly noticeable at a quick glance, but is a nice touch under close inspection...typical of Rolex.

20 February 2009, 12:06 AM	#26
Lion "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Leo Location: Midwest Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI Posts: 21,461	It really doesn't matter to me. If I buy a newer Rolex and it's there thats fine but if I buy an older model(but new) and it"s not there that's fine too!!! __________________ SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#) THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!! MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!!

20 February 2009, 12:09 AM	#27
karmatp "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Trevor Location: Arizona Posts: 5,740	Doesn't make a difference to me, I could take it or leave it. __________________ My grails:

20 February 2009, 12:50 AM	#28
jimbo1mcm Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: connecticut, usa Watch: New GMT2C Posts: 320	Rehaut Ilikeitilikeitilikeitilikeit

20 February 2009, 12:52 AM	#29
jdc "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Martin Location: UK Posts: 7,023	yes I do not like it

20 February 2009, 12:57 AM	#30
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	I like it as another way to identify FAKES! I voted pro RolexRolexRolex __________________ member#3242

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)