ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 March 2009, 08:14 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Allan
Location: California
Posts: 3,210
|
Submariner vs Daytona
I will be buying my first Rolex. I am over 40 but not old. For a first Rolex, would you recommend buying a Submariner or a Daytona? Is a Daytona more of a fad?
Thanks Allan |
7 March 2009, 08:17 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 2,891
|
i suggested a ss daytona as 40 years old gift and a counter argument was made. and that argument was it can be very difficult to read time off a daytona and i stood corrected...
it's up to you chronograph or divers?
__________________
16 GS Titles 16 AMS titles (1 short of Agassi) 23 Consecutive GS semifinals 17/18 of the last GS finals, 237 consecutive weeks #1 5 consecutive wimbledon + 1 = 6 cups 5 consecutive US open 4 Australian open 1 Sweet french open a crown for every achievement The Greatest Of All Time loves Rolex |
7 March 2009, 08:17 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: montreal
Posts: 459
|
Daytona is in no way a fad. I chose the Daytona. It really is only up to you. SS Subs are a dime a dozen I feel, but that in no way takes away from it's beauty.
Goodluck! |
7 March 2009, 08:18 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 339
|
Buy the one you prefer the watches are miles apart in terms of style and virtually impossible to compare......two great options though
__________________
Cheers Ryan |
7 March 2009, 08:19 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 47
|
I'd go with the Sub, as it's such an iconic and perfect piece. With the money left over, I'd add a Speedmaster, which is my favorite watch of all time. That way you get two legendary watches, and will probably still have some cash left over
|
7 March 2009, 08:20 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Fullerton, CA
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 916
|
sub no date!
|
7 March 2009, 08:22 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NYC
Watch: Daytona "M" series
Posts: 133
|
SS daytona white face is easier to read time than the black face just fyi
|
7 March 2009, 08:31 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
I would go with a Daytona over the Sub.
|
7 March 2009, 08:35 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,937
|
Depending on what you are looking for and what you like-the Sub could be the easy choice, or the other way around. Totally different.
|
7 March 2009, 08:42 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Riley
Location: 41.89° N, 87.62°
Watch: URWERK
Posts: 499
|
daytona is not as legible because "loud" subdials.
sub would be better for older eyes, and you have a bezel to turn if you really need a "chrono".. daytona is more allure and rarity |
7 March 2009, 08:46 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Danny
Location: Ca
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 936
|
Well with opposite ends of the spectrum here you may as well through in the GMT while your at it. If that is not an option I think I would go after the Daytona. The more complicated the movement the more fun the watch becomes. There are far to many Subs out on the street. Can’t you get a Sub no date and a Sub Date for the price of a SS Daytona?
|
7 March 2009, 08:55 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: PAUL
Location: u k
Watch: WHITE FACE DAYTONA
Posts: 632
|
My first rolex was a TT datona, i still have it and i still love it. I used to feel uncomfortable wearing it for work and day to day use, Some people see it as flash and it marked easily. I then bought my ss sub no date i wear it as my every day it is a great watch never gets noticed just understated class,
Now whenever i put the daytona on it feels special, it just does it for me. If you put a gun to my head, and you would have too! to get me to part with any of them, i would keep the daytona ....... My answer to your question is get the one that speaks to you!! and save for the other. You cant go wrong what ever you choose.. |
7 March 2009, 09:00 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
Don't buy a watch because of its reputation, buy it because it speaks to you Both are great watches, and any steel Rolex sports watch will hold its value.
|
7 March 2009, 09:01 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
Coming from someone who has both, I'd lean heavily towards the Sub since I prefer a date on my primary watch. My suggestion, check out an SS GMT (old style), that is the one for me out of all of the options by a far margin.
__________________
Instagram @HDHNTER |
7 March 2009, 02:36 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maple
Watch: Daytona, Sub Date
Posts: 21
|
I would get a SS Daytona first ... maybe you will happy with it and you don't need to buy another watch again :-D
|
7 March 2009, 02:43 PM | #16 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Oscar
Location: Florida
Watch: Me!!!
Posts: 23,233
|
I say buy the daytona...40 years old? you need to reward yourself...sub you can buy it anytime...but i say go for the daytona...you can get the sub next time as your 2nd watch at age 41...
__________________
|
7 March 2009, 03:29 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dubai
Watch: SDDS
Posts: 27
|
Practical and for everyday use go for the Sub-Date as a first watch.
|
7 March 2009, 03:35 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,295
|
Daytona - it feels a lot more comfortable on the wrist.
__________________
__________________ |
7 March 2009, 04:11 PM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: U.S
Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS
Posts: 5,785
|
I'll go for the SS Daytona.
|
7 March 2009, 04:34 PM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,528
|
Hmmm.
Daytona.
__________________
E |
7 March 2009, 05:13 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
|
Buy the one you like the most Allan!
|
7 March 2009, 05:47 PM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: robert
Location: CALIFORNIA
Watch: GMT IIC,SS Daytona
Posts: 127
|
I will buy the SS GMT IIc, its more functional watch, it looks like the SUB, but the difference is that the bezel is ceramic and it has 24 hour hand. You could set watch on three time zones at one time. This is just my preference, whatever you choose, you will be happy, they are all good watches.
|
7 March 2009, 07:28 PM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Daytona
|
7 March 2009, 07:33 PM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Ahmed Keraidy
Location: Cairo,Egypt
Watch: Submariner 16610 M
Posts: 816
|
Go for the Sub Date my friend :)))))))))))
|
7 March 2009, 08:31 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Adrian
Location: UK
Posts: 953
|
2 very different watches in most aspects so I suggest it really depends on how you will wear it. Alternatively go for both!
__________________
Rolex 16610LV (2007) PAM 312K (2009) PAM 292K (2009) |
7 March 2009, 09:40 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: F
Location: Scotland
Watch: Exp II White Face
Posts: 4,272
|
The call would have to be a Daytona, but that is based purely on my thougts.
Enjoy whichever you choose.
__________________
Why have what's new when you have what's best. f |
7 March 2009, 10:55 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,596
|
You can go wrong with any of the two,if it was me I will get the Daytona first
__________________
______________________________ You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again. |
7 March 2009, 11:57 PM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: John T
Location: Benidorm, Spain
Watch: Blue sub & SS Sub
Posts: 226
|
|
8 March 2009, 12:00 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
They are two completely different watches, it's like comparing apples to zebra's. The sub is a classic tool watch and the Daytona is more of a dress watch. Which one do you like and which one fits your lifestyle? Do you need the date feature? Would you ever in your life actually use the chrono features, if not why pay for them? I personally prefer the sub, but I am a tool watch guy and hate polished center links, the Daytona does nothing for me. I would buy a Omega Speedmaster over the Daytona and buy a Sub date like someone already stated. Good luck with your decision.
__________________
My grails: |
8 March 2009, 01:51 AM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 26
|
Assuming we are talking about a new SS watch here.
In this not so good economy I would get the SS Daytona; unless you are a good friend of an AD, when the economy bounces back, it will not be easy to get a New Daytona. If you don't like it later on, you can flip it or just get a used Sub. I bought my watch right before the recent economy crash, so a new Daytona was not even an option. But surely you can tell from my signature that I am very happy with my Sub-Date. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.