The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 October 2019, 06:07 AM   #1
JonTheKingJames
"TRF" Member
 
JonTheKingJames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Jon
Location: Long Island, NY
Watch: 126600 SD 43
Posts: 173
How prone to bracelet stretch are the newer Submariners?

I haven’t seen a post on this in a while, curious if there are any updates from long time users of the Sub and Sub Date six digit models.
__________________
CURRENT: 2021 Sea Dweller 126600
FORMER: 1988 Day-Date 18238, 2019 Submariner 114060. Tag Heuer Monaco Titan.
JonTheKingJames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 06:27 AM   #2
samuel019
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
samuel019's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Triad
Watch: Me go broke!!!!
Posts: 4,038
Ive had my 116613 since 2013 and I swear its just as it was day 1. I'm sure there is bound to be some stretch but I cant tell it. I wear all mine tight enough where I can just barely fit my index finger between the clasp and wrist. So not to tight nor to loose imo. I think the new heavier bracelets help with stretch.

As a matter of fact all my 6 digit models are like that. I dont have a ton like some on TRF but I have a few.
__________________
Rolex Collection: A few here and there. Just ask
samuel019 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 06:32 AM   #3
Tangier11
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Paul
Location: Southern Virginia
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 2,544
this whole stretch thing is a non issue in my mind, as the owner of a 30+ year old heavily worn YG DD with minimum stretch it will be a LONG time if ever that it actually is an issue. With the new SS Subs, I would think never would it be an issue
Tangier11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 06:36 AM   #4
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,514
Solid link bracelets when washed often, stretching is a non issue. Like, your kids won’t have any issues when your gone.
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 07:23 AM   #5
In-Cog-Neeto
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Around
Posts: 1,124
I hate it when it’s stretched out
__________________
That's what watches are for; not just for recording the time; but our own travel through that time. - Explorer Steve
In-Cog-Neeto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 10:05 AM   #6
Ticknaway
"TRF" Member
 
Ticknaway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Dave
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,028
No stretch on mine.
Ticknaway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 10:10 AM   #7
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
Haven't noticed any stretch on my WG Smurf, and I'm not the greatest at washing it. lol
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 10:30 AM   #8
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
Here's the deal; larger links mean less stretch. Hardly ever see stretch in the oyster bracelets.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 10:49 AM   #9
sgarrity
"TRF" Member
 
sgarrity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 258
When did Rolex move to solid bracelets? And does it vary by model?
sgarrity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 01:30 PM   #10
1WatchDawg
"TRF" Member
 
1WatchDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: GEORGIA
Watch: 16610T Sub Date
Posts: 413
I have an M series (2007) 16610 that I wear daily. No noticeable stretch at all!
1WatchDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 01:48 PM   #11
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
I don't think any watch is prone to stretch if kept clean. Since I succumbed to wristwatch madness and started breaking my watches special brush out I haven't noticed any stretch at all.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 03:14 PM   #12
shaunylw
"TRF" Member
 
shaunylw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 4,657
These new bracelets are so solid, i can’t see it being an issue. If you wear it with dirt and grime in it constantly, i mean just filthy, it will “stretch”. I just can’t see that happening though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
shaunylw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 06:31 PM   #13
jimcameron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ByDawns Earlylite
Watch: 16800
Posts: 3,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tangier11 View Post
this whole stretch thing is a non issue in my mind, as the owner of a 30+ year old heavily worn YG DD with minimum stretch it will be a LONG time if ever that it actually is an issue. With the new SS Subs, I would think never would it be an issue
This
jimcameron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 07:35 PM   #14
abozz
"TRF" Member
 
abozz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: In my home.
Watch: 116660, 126600
Posts: 2,905
2 years with the 116610 and 1 year day and night with the 126600, not strech at all yet.

Enviado desde mi SM-G975F mediante Tapatalk
abozz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 08:05 PM   #15
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonTheKingJames View Post
I haven’t seen a post on this in a while, curious if there are any updates from long time users of the Sub and Sub Date six digit models.
First its not stretch its wear in the pin holes,below a picture of my own late 1990s working tool SD it was used and sometimes abused for many years underwater as a real working tool watch.And watch has seen more use and scratches than most of today's Rolex watches will see in ten lifetimes even if it had the newer bracelet.It has been serviced and polished by 3 different RSC world wide yet shows very little wear or stretch,just keep any bracelet clean with regular service they will all in most cases out last there owners.

__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 08:51 PM   #16
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
YG Sub worn daily and no bracelet wear whatsoever. But I keep it clean on a daily basis and wear it fitted snug to wrist.
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2019, 10:00 PM   #17
Chester01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: East Coast
Watch: 16610
Posts: 4,933
Can’t speak for 6’digits, but my 20 year old 16610 worn doing anything and everything has almost 0. While it’s never been polished, I do clean it after hard use.
Chester01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2019, 01:12 AM   #18
othertbone
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Florida, USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/Vin Omega
Posts: 1,972
I don't think that is an issue anymore. But I guess we will see in 30 years lol
othertbone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2019, 01:13 AM   #19
Brny11
"TRF" Member
 
Brny11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,460
Haven’t noticed in 3 years any stretch. But again, 3 years is a very small sample size. Sooo, TBD.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Brny11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2019, 02:12 AM   #20
Calatrava r
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 11,425
The stretch comes over many years in the older hollow link bracelets which were worn loosely on the wrist. Its all the movement between the links from a loose fit that wears out the bracelet. I don't think surface grime has a whole lot to with it unless its really bad, caked and abrasive. I would think that would cause ugly surface wear but not stretch which is more internal.
Calatrava r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2019, 04:47 AM   #21
joli160
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calatrava r View Post
The stretch comes over many years in the older hollow link bracelets which were worn loosely on the wrist. Its all the movement between the links from a loose fit that wears out the bracelet. I don't think surface grime has a whole lot to with it unless its really bad, caked and abrasive. I would think that would cause ugly surface wear but not stretch which is more internal.
The solid bracelets also wear out as the hollow ones in my experience. The contact surface is the same. Indeed it's the loose wearing styles back in the day .

You'd be surprised to see how much grime and nasty stuff comes out of bracelet from a regular well cleaned watch after using an ultra sonic
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2019, 05:25 AM   #22
jimcameron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ByDawns Earlylite
Watch: 16800
Posts: 3,580
I bought my 16800 in 1985. I've had it serviced twice by well vetted Independents. The bracelet is virtually the same as it was 35 yrs ago when I bought it BNIB from the AD. I scuba'd with it, rode motorcycles, shot all imaginable firearms excluding Barrett .50 with it, was involved in countless tactical missions with it, and it is as good as new. Figure something else out to worry about.
jimcameron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2019, 05:27 AM   #23
ThatExplorer
"TRF" Member
 
ThatExplorer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Real Name: Cory
Location: US
Watch: 114060
Posts: 652
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimcameron View Post
I bought my 16800 in 1985. I've had it serviced twice by well vetted Independents. The bracelet is virtually the same as it was 35 yrs ago when I bought it BNIB from the AD. I scuba'd with it, rode motorcycles, shot all imaginable firearms excluding Barrett .50 with it, was involved in countless tactical missions with it, and it is as good as new. Figure something else out to worry about.


Would have to agree with this 100%. Have worn a 16610 on two deployments to Iraq and had the hell beat out of it with no issues, stills wears the same minus all the scratches and scuffs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
--------------------------------------------------------------
116610-214270-116710-113700-114300-M79380RB-Zodiac GR
ThatExplorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2019, 06:20 PM   #24
jimcameron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ByDawns Earlylite
Watch: 16800
Posts: 3,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatExplorer View Post
Would have to agree with this 100%. Have worn a 16610 on two deployments to Iraq and had the hell beat out of it with no issues, stills wears the same minus all the scratches and scuffs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jimcameron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 10:27 AM   #25
Miels
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: NJ
Posts: 6
Apologies for resurrecting an older thread for my first post. I just have a question I was hoping you could help me with.

After quite some time of wanting one, I finally got my first watch. A new 41mm no date from an AD. Amazing experience and I adore the watch.

After having it for a few days I noticed that there is a little wiggle where the top links meet the case. And also after looking closely I am wondering if there is too much of a gap between links, tried to include a pic but got an alert that I need 10 posts before I do so. Is there a way putting it back in the Rolex box on the pillow could have stretched it after links were removed? There was certainly some tension when I did it.

I know I could totally be insane, so please be kind. This was just a big moment for me and where I expect my watch to gain some wear over time I do want to make sure all is normal while it’s new.

Thanks so much for dealing with this newcomer.
Miels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 02:58 PM   #26
Kyle3130
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kyle3130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miels View Post
Apologies for resurrecting an older thread for my first post. I just have a question I was hoping you could help me with.

After quite some time of wanting one, I finally got my first watch. A new 41mm no date from an AD. Amazing experience and I adore the watch.

After having it for a few days I noticed that there is a little wiggle where the top links meet the case. And also after looking closely I am wondering if there is too much of a gap between links, tried to include a pic but got an alert that I need 10 posts before I do so. Is there a way putting it back in the Rolex box on the pillow could have stretched it after links were removed? There was certainly some tension when I did it.

I know I could totally be insane, so please be kind. This was just a big moment for me and where I expect my watch to gain some wear over time I do want to make sure all is normal while it’s new.

Thanks so much for dealing with this newcomer.
Welcome and congrats on the new watch! When you say “no date” I assume you are referring to the Submariner? I got mine a couple months ago and the bracelet was tight and a bit squeaky for about a month. Now, it’s still tight but no squeak. Please don’t worry about that stuff until the watchmaker servicing it in about 50 years mentions that you might want to look into a bracelet repair. Just wear it and enjoy it.
__________________
Kyle3130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 06:06 PM   #27
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonTheKingJames View Post
I haven’t seen a post on this in a while, curious if there are any updates from long time users of the Sub and Sub Date six digit models.
Well my 5 digit 16600 SD oyster bracelet has been well used and often abused for many years as a proper working tool watch underwater. And now well over 20 years and has seen more use that todays mostly pampered watches will see in ten lifetimes. Yet shows very little wear in the links or pins, reason quite simple keep them clean with just plain old soap and watches, and regular service maintenance. Then they will last a lifetime with wearing daily a snug fit on wrist.

Today this Internet term "hollow link" is a complete and utter misnomer all it means in the real world, is simply this. All the links are made from heavy solid gold or solid S.steel tubing and then formed into shape in a press. This leaves a void in the center, just like any other piece of tube,however, the tubes are still made from solid 18Ct gold or solid SS.

While the newer so called solid link bracelet might feel more substantial the newer type or so called solid links are still machined but they are machined with holes drilled right through the metal. So in the real world they are as well technically hollow but not to the same extent as the older type. And in every day wearing would doubt if any real difference in strength or longevity of life as long as you keep them clean. Thats the simple answer in the life of any Rolex oyster bracelet keep it clean and they will last 20-30 years plus.

Even the older type 5 series Oyster bracelets have been stress tested and will take 525 lbs pressure before breaking and that's enough to seriously damage your wrist.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 06:11 PM   #28
inadeje
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,907
Steel doesn’t stretch. I guess the term has been coined over the years to explain the pin wear that occurs between link and axis. I believe that one metal had a higher tensile strength than the other. Can’t remember if its the pin or the link that was harder than the other, thus causing wear when blended with skin oils, creams, grit, sand and debris which made the perfect home-made honing paste…of the type used to hone cylinder head valves…
__________________
♛ 218206 Roman ♛ 116689 ♛ 126710BLRO ♛ 16520 white ♛ 16523 white ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1R-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Bronzo 671 & 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Cartier Santos XL - Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 06:39 PM   #29
BLNR Nairobi
"TRF" Member
 
BLNR Nairobi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Tony
Location: Global
Watch: All of them.
Posts: 1,141
Deleted
BLNR Nairobi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 07:44 PM   #30
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miels View Post
Apologies for resurrecting an older thread for my first post. I just have a question I was hoping you could help me with.

After quite some time of wanting one, I finally got my first watch. A new 41mm no date from an AD. Amazing experience and I adore the watch.

After having it for a few days I noticed that there is a little wiggle where the top links meet the case. And also after looking closely I am wondering if there is too much of a gap between links, tried to include a pic but got an alert that I need 10 posts before I do so. Is there a way putting it back in the Rolex box on the pillow could have stretched it after links were removed? There was certainly some tension when I did it.

I know I could totally be insane, so please be kind. This was just a big moment for me and where I expect my watch to gain some wear over time I do want to make sure all is normal while it’s new.

Thanks so much for dealing with this newcomer.
A little wiggle is quite normal within manufacturing tolerances where the end links meet the case. You can generally feel it rather than see it. If it wasn't there, it would be almost impossible to fit the bracelet to the case.

As for the Rolex box pillow, assuming its the same flexible "sprung" pillow it has always been, no, the tension from the pillow is not going to have caused any wear or stretch.

__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.