ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 January 2020, 09:29 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 57
|
Holy Moly this 6542 is Hot!
|
11 January 2020, 09:37 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: 5508 & 9401
Posts: 641
|
That level of radiation is actually harmful if you’re wearing it 8 hours a day.
|
11 January 2020, 09:51 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 57
|
|
11 January 2020, 01:35 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,218
|
Holy Moly this 6542 is Hot!
As a Navy Nuke, I had not heard of Sv, but I know rem, so I looked it up and 1 rem = 100 Sv
Doing the math: 119uSv/hr = 1.19urem/hr An average person in the US receives around 1rem/3yrs or 333mrem/yr There are approximately 8766 hrs/yr 1.19urem/hr x 8766hr/yr = 10,432urem/yr, which is only 10.4mrem/yr or 3.1% of the average American’s average radiation exposure per year. Bottom line - radiation from these watches are almost background noise and nothing to be concerned with. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), which sets the safety limits for radiation workers, allows up to 5 REM per year (10 CFR Part 20). That’s 15 times higher than the average American. Those government limits are for whole body radiation, which the watch does not give, but even if it were to be whole body equivalent, 119uSv/hr worn 24/7/365 (never removed) would only deliver 0.2% of the federally mandated radiation exposure limit. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
11 January 2020, 02:18 PM | #6 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,218
|
Quote:
If you live at sea level and your buddy lives in Denver, that could account for reading disparities. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
11 January 2020, 02:36 PM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
I feel much better now...I was honestly a bit concerned as I was unsure what to think. |
|
11 January 2020, 03:29 PM | #8 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: 5508 & 9401
Posts: 641
|
Quote:
No. 1 rem is 0.01 Sv. Thus 119 uSv/hr is 0.0119 rem/hr. Thus in 8776 hours you’re getting 104 rem, although realistically it would probably be 1/3 that if you wear it 8 hours a day 365 days a week. So let's say 33 rem. That would be 100x the average person and 6x the NRC safety limit. However, I would argue that since the watch is concentrated on the arm, that would be more dangerous than whole body. Your arm is being bombarded with the radiation. I’m not saying watchknut will have a tumor tomorrow (especially since his is only 42 uSv/hr) but I would be very wary of wearing the watch frequently. You’re basically getting 100x the dose an average person gets, while also being concentrated on the arm. There’s a reason why the bakelites got recalled.... Further information, from wikipedia, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...chart-XKCD.svg As you can see maximum dose for radiation workers is 50 mSv. If you wear your watch @ 119 uSv/hr you would reach that dose in 420 hours. In 8 hour blocks thats approximately 52 days. Watchknut I follow you on instagram and know that you have a varied rotation so I think you'll be okay. |
|
11 January 2020, 05:57 PM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,295
|
Unfortunately, Frank's calculations are correct, and I don't think you can write off the exposure as negligible. I am not someone who over-reacts to things like this, but it may be worth limiting the wrist time of that watch (e.g. a few times a month), especially if you have any known risk factors or family history.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
11 January 2020, 07:17 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
|
Wow, these watches are dangerous... better just send them all to me!
|
11 January 2020, 07:55 PM | #11 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,675
|
Quote:
Always wondered about this.
__________________
The King of Cool. |
|
11 January 2020, 10:53 PM | #12 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
And yes, it get very little wrist time, and when I wear to work, it spends most of the time on the desk. |
|
11 January 2020, 11:26 PM | #13 |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,588
|
Astounding, remarkable and just a little scary..............
I think I will opt for collecting a 1675 with pointed crown guards
__________________
Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim |
12 January 2020, 01:01 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pacifica, CA
Watch: Double Red SD
Posts: 308
|
Shouldn’t it be measured from the case back to get a better sense of what is being absorbed by the body?
|
12 January 2020, 02:42 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
|
When dicussing how dangerous radiation is you need to take into account if it is alfa, beta or gamma radiation. Watches are relatively safe as long as the radium stays in the case. Most dangerous on a 6542 is the bezel as it is just capseled by plastic which easily cracks and you risk inhaling the dangerous stuff. Just wearing a hot watch should be fairly safe even if I personally wouldn’t wear these kind of watches reguarly. Just feels wrong.
__________________
Instagram: @perj123 |
16 January 2020, 06:57 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 70
|
|
19 January 2020, 11:34 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Rich
Location: NC
Watch: Rolex 1675
Posts: 2,359
|
Like a doc told me. We are all terminal. I bet there is something else than a watch that will kill us all. Keep and enjoy! Rich
Member of Nylon Nation Member of Red Sox Nation Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rich Member of Nylon Nation Red Sox Nation Instagram watchguy97 |
20 January 2020, 08:07 AM | #19 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
|
Your buddy should throw his into an incinerator!
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808) |
22 January 2020, 02:28 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: carl
Location: NYC
Watch: 1675 18k
Posts: 13
|
Nice one
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.