ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
29 March 2009, 10:59 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 143
|
GMT IIc or DSSD
Which would you buy first pending a 10% price increase April 1st (Canada)...the GMT IIc or the DSSD? Which do you like better and why?
|
29 March 2009, 11:02 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Todd
Location: US
Posts: 3,528
|
I'm anxious to hear the results of this thread as I'm thinking of this exact scenario. I have said the GTM IIc would be my next watch but I've tried on a Deep Sea 3 times in the past week and man, it's growing on me. It is a sweeeeeeeeet watch....a little expensive though.
|
29 March 2009, 11:08 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Kansas
Watch: 16610, Omega PO
Posts: 1,898
|
I considered both and actually looked at both last weekend in Wichita. In the end the DEEPSEA won out because of it's larger size and more utilitarian look. I've had a GMT Master Pepsi in the past and loved it, but I've come to embrace the larger watches.
Cost was also a major consideration, but I really preferred the DSSD. I learned a long time ago that I should get what I want the first time out because otherwise I always tend to regret it. |
29 March 2009, 11:04 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Andy
Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY
Watch: Me Watching You!!
Posts: 3,260
|
for me it's the DSSD...love it....so glad i got mine earlier. the GMTIIc is an awesome choice too if you decide to go for it before the DSSD.
|
29 March 2009, 11:09 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Leo
Location: Midwest
Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI
Posts: 21,461
|
I would have to flip a coin and then go for the best two out of three!!!
__________________
SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#) THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!! MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!! |
29 March 2009, 11:17 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 143
|
I have the SD right now and an Omega PO chrongraph (45mm) so.......??
|
29 March 2009, 06:18 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
Quote:
Ah...the age old question, "Which one & why?" As always, I say buy the one you think meets your preferences & tastes best...none of us can really speak to those things for you. I'm sure you're leaning toward one over the other...9 out of 10 times that's probably the one that is right for you. I like them both & would be happy with either...but for me, the DSSD was the one I picked for a few reasons. 1. I prefer an all brushed bracelet over PCL's. If I had my druthers, I wish the DS was 100% brushed with no high polish on the sides of the case/bracelet. 2. While I've come to appreciate a 40mm case, I still prefer something a little larger. The IIC Super-case actually looks larger than 40mm to me, but I still prefer the larger heft/look of the DS. 3. I know how I use my watches, and for me, the timing bezel feature w/ lumed pearl of the DS would be used on a daily basis as opposed to very rarely using the 2nd time zone feature of the IIC. The few times I travel I reset my watch to local and forget about other timezones (since I usually travel on vacation...the only thing I want to think about is here & now). 4. GLIDELOCK. Need I say more. This clasp has become such an addiction to me I'm considering naming my first child Glidelock (Glidelocky if it's a girl) because I like it so much. Again, those are the reasons I'm drawn to the DS over the IIC...if most of those don't speak to you, then the IIC is probably the better watch for your purposes. Good luck and keep us posted on your decision. |
|
29 March 2009, 07:09 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
I'd go for the Deepsea, but that's because I already have an older GMT2, the 16760. If I didn't, the choice would be more difficult but I'd have to say I'd still stick to the Deepsea because of its different size, unique look and Glidelock bracelet. Whichever you choose though, you won't go wrong because they're both great watches!
|
29 March 2009, 11:44 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Watch: THE MIGHTY DEEPSEA
Posts: 839
|
Deepsea
|
29 March 2009, 11:56 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Canada
Watch: GMT Master IIc
Posts: 472
|
Just got a GMT IIc 3 weeks ago.....still has all the protective tapes....
I have never considered a DSSD...tried it on and it's too big for my wrist! |
29 March 2009, 11:55 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 702
|
When I see the DSSD from the top I love it. When I see its thickness from the side it's a turn-off. It looks top heavy and clunky to me unless it's on a really big wrist (and even then I don't like it so much). I think the IIc is much more elegant and better proportioned, but try 'em both and get the one that rocks your wrist!
|
29 March 2009, 07:25 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
|
Quote:
|
|
29 March 2009, 09:51 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,798
|
Just bought both
I just bought both before the price increase, both have great appeal ,hard to decide which one to buy.
|
29 March 2009, 12:00 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 2,891
|
i have the GMTIIc it's my favourite... i tried the dssd i liked it... i like them both... sometimes i wish i never bought my ss daytona...
__________________
16 GS Titles 16 AMS titles (1 short of Agassi) 23 Consecutive GS semifinals 17/18 of the last GS finals, 237 consecutive weeks #1 5 consecutive wimbledon + 1 = 6 cups 5 consecutive US open 4 Australian open 1 Sweet french open a crown for every achievement The Greatest Of All Time loves Rolex |
29 March 2009, 12:32 PM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 521
|
The GMTIIC with a 10% increase will bring it's MSRP up to $8492 CAD before tax. After it's $9,595.96 CAD
The Deepsea with a 10% increase will bring it's MSRP up to $10,945 CAD before tax. After it's $12,367.85 A difference of $2,771.89 CAD after tax. That's a big difference! Factor in that you're more likely to get a better discount on a GMTIIc than on a Deepsea and it's almost why bother with the Deepsea. Another way to look at it is if you were to take that money from the purchase of the GMTIIc, you could buy a pretty good used Toyota car. If you were to take the money from the Deepsea, you could buy a brand new Chevy car!!!! From a personal perspective, I never liked the GMTIIc. I'm a diehard for the SDDS and bought one just this month. It was a no brainer. Had I not and the prices had gone up, I think I'd think twice about the SDDS as tomorrow it's a 5-figure watch whereas it used to be 4. I'd probably have elected to just keep my old SD4000. By the way, I love my SDDS and have no regrets about getting it and selling my old SD. |
29 March 2009, 09:58 PM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
|
|
30 March 2009, 02:08 AM | #17 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 521
|
Quote:
Were you asking me if you should get rid of the LV for the DSSD? For myself that would be a no-brainer. Yes I would. Some people here would think I'm crazy as to many are speculating that the LV watch is not a permanent addition to the Rolex line and may be discontinued at any time and be worth something 30 years from now. Personally, I don't collect watches and have NO plans whatsoever to do so in the future. I would also never go into debt for a watch and it sounds like you already are with the LV. Unless you can dump/sell that watch in the next 72 hours, personally, I would not buy another Rolex. But that's just my financial advise. |
|
30 March 2009, 02:15 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 143
|
No, not in debt at all!
I just opted for a payment plan with no interest for the sub to secure the price. A 15% discount with no interest for a year is great. I'm in no hurry for the watch....just trying to beat the price increase. |
29 March 2009, 12:33 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,254
|
GMT IIc. Love that 4th hand.
__________________
------------------------------- Member of the Nylon Nation |
29 March 2009, 12:35 PM | #20 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Oscar
Location: Florida
Watch: Me!!!
Posts: 23,233
|
Deep sea...no doubt!!
__________________
|
29 March 2009, 12:59 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
As always it's the one you like. Both are fantastic pieces, have their champions,and in their own way bring bring the newest Rolex has to offer to the party.
For me, if were a choice between the two the IIc would win out because it gives me everything I need/want in a watch. Others will pick the DS for the same reasons. Either will bring a lifetime of happiness if you pick the one that hits your buttons. .....or both. |
29 March 2009, 01:01 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 2,891
|
Mike, again with the pictures... you just like breaking my heart don't you?
__________________
16 GS Titles 16 AMS titles (1 short of Agassi) 23 Consecutive GS semifinals 17/18 of the last GS finals, 237 consecutive weeks #1 5 consecutive wimbledon + 1 = 6 cups 5 consecutive US open 4 Australian open 1 Sweet french open a crown for every achievement The Greatest Of All Time loves Rolex |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.