The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 March 2009, 10:59 AM   #1
edge591
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 143
GMT IIc or DSSD

Which would you buy first pending a 10% price increase April 1st (Canada)...the GMT IIc or the DSSD? Which do you like better and why?
edge591 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 11:02 AM   #2
therolexguy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
therolexguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Todd
Location: US
Posts: 3,528
I'm anxious to hear the results of this thread as I'm thinking of this exact scenario. I have said the GTM IIc would be my next watch but I've tried on a Deep Sea 3 times in the past week and man, it's growing on me. It is a sweeeeeeeeet watch....a little expensive though.
therolexguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 11:08 AM   #3
smallcandle
"TRF" Member
 
smallcandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Kansas
Watch: 16610, Omega PO
Posts: 1,898
I considered both and actually looked at both last weekend in Wichita. In the end the DEEPSEA won out because of it's larger size and more utilitarian look. I've had a GMT Master Pepsi in the past and loved it, but I've come to embrace the larger watches.

Cost was also a major consideration, but I really preferred the DSSD. I learned a long time ago that I should get what I want the first time out because otherwise I always tend to regret it.

smallcandle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 11:04 AM   #4
hflee55
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Andy
Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY
Watch: Me Watching You!!
Posts: 3,260
for me it's the DSSD...love it....so glad i got mine earlier. the GMTIIc is an awesome choice too if you decide to go for it before the DSSD.
hflee55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 11:09 AM   #5
Lion
"TRF" Member
 
Lion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Leo
Location: Midwest
Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI
Posts: 21,461
I would have to flip a coin and then go for the best two out of three!!!
__________________

SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#)
THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!!
MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley
MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum
Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!!
Lion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 11:17 AM   #6
edge591
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 143
I have the SD right now and an Omega PO chrongraph (45mm) so.......??
edge591 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 06:18 PM   #7
moby33
"TRF" Member
 
moby33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lion View Post
I would have to flip a coin and then go for the best two out of three!!!
Now that's funny!

Ah...the age old question, "Which one & why?" As always, I say buy the one you think meets your preferences & tastes best...none of us can really speak to those things for you. I'm sure you're leaning toward one over the other...9 out of 10 times that's probably the one that is right for you. I like them both & would be happy with either...but for me, the DSSD was the one I picked for a few reasons.

1. I prefer an all brushed bracelet over PCL's. If I had my druthers, I wish the DS was 100% brushed with no high polish on the sides of the case/bracelet.

2. While I've come to appreciate a 40mm case, I still prefer something a little larger. The IIC Super-case actually looks larger than 40mm to me, but I still prefer the larger heft/look of the DS.

3. I know how I use my watches, and for me, the timing bezel feature w/ lumed pearl of the DS would be used on a daily basis as opposed to very rarely using the 2nd time zone feature of the IIC. The few times I travel I reset my watch to local and forget about other timezones (since I usually travel on vacation...the only thing I want to think about is here & now).

4. GLIDELOCK. Need I say more. This clasp has become such an addiction to me I'm considering naming my first child Glidelock (Glidelocky if it's a girl) because I like it so much.

Again, those are the reasons I'm drawn to the DS over the IIC...if most of those don't speak to you, then the IIC is probably the better watch for your purposes. Good luck and keep us posted on your decision.
moby33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 07:09 PM   #8
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
I'd go for the Deepsea, but that's because I already have an older GMT2, the 16760. If I didn't, the choice would be more difficult but I'd have to say I'd still stick to the Deepsea because of its different size, unique look and Glidelock bracelet. Whichever you choose though, you won't go wrong because they're both great watches!
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 11:44 AM   #9
tthopp05
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Watch: THE MIGHTY DEEPSEA
Posts: 839
Deepsea
tthopp05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 11:56 AM   #10
LDLemu4U
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Canada
Watch: GMT Master IIc
Posts: 472
Just got a GMT IIc 3 weeks ago.....still has all the protective tapes....
I have never considered a DSSD...tried it on and it's too big for my wrist!
Attached Images
 
LDLemu4U is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 11:55 AM   #11
WatchSmith
2024 Pledge Member
 
WatchSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 702
When I see the DSSD from the top I love it. When I see its thickness from the side it's a turn-off. It looks top heavy and clunky to me unless it's on a really big wrist (and even then I don't like it so much). I think the IIc is much more elegant and better proportioned, but try 'em both and get the one that rocks your wrist!
WatchSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 07:25 PM   #12
yannis
"TRF" Member
 
yannis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triplock View Post
When I see the DSSD from the top I love it. When I see its thickness from the side it's a turn-off. It looks top heavy and clunky to me unless it's on a really big wrist (and even then I don't like it so much). I think the IIc is much more elegant and better proportioned, but try 'em both and get the one that rocks your wrist!
I agree it doesn't look good on me either. Try them both on!
__________________
Rolex Submariner 116610LV | Tudor 79220N



yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 09:51 PM   #13
kayaker21
"TRF" Member
 
kayaker21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,798
Just bought both

I just bought both before the price increase, both have great appeal ,hard to decide which one to buy.
Attached Images
   
kayaker21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 12:00 PM   #14
chenx15
"TRF" Member
 
chenx15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 2,891
i have the GMTIIc it's my favourite... i tried the dssd i liked it... i like them both... sometimes i wish i never bought my ss daytona...
__________________
16 GS Titles
16 AMS titles (1 short of Agassi)
23 Consecutive GS semifinals
17/18 of the last GS finals, 237 consecutive weeks #1
5 consecutive wimbledon + 1 = 6 cups
5 consecutive US open
4 Australian open
1 Sweet french open
a crown for every achievement
The Greatest Of All Time loves Rolex
chenx15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 12:32 PM   #15
Whiskey
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 521
The GMTIIC with a 10% increase will bring it's MSRP up to $8492 CAD before tax. After it's $9,595.96 CAD

The Deepsea with a 10% increase will bring it's MSRP up to $10,945 CAD before tax. After it's $12,367.85

A difference of $2,771.89 CAD after tax.

That's a big difference!

Factor in that you're more likely to get a better discount on a GMTIIc than on a Deepsea and it's almost why bother with the Deepsea.

Another way to look at it is if you were to take that money from the purchase of the GMTIIc, you could buy a pretty good used Toyota car. If you were to take the money from the Deepsea, you could buy a brand new Chevy car!!!!

From a personal perspective, I never liked the GMTIIc. I'm a diehard for the SDDS and bought one just this month. It was a no brainer.

Had I not and the prices had gone up, I think I'd think twice about the SDDS as tomorrow it's a 5-figure watch whereas it used to be 4. I'd probably have elected to just keep my old SD4000.

By the way, I love my SDDS and have no regrets about getting it and selling my old SD.
Whiskey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 09:58 PM   #16
edge591
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whiskey View Post
The GMTIIC with a 10% increase will bring it's MSRP up to $8492 CAD before tax. After it's $9,595.96 CAD

The Deepsea with a 10% increase will bring it's MSRP up to $10,945 CAD before tax. After it's $12,367.85

A difference of $2,771.89 CAD after tax.

That's a big difference!

Factor in that you're more likely to get a better discount on a GMTIIc than on a Deepsea and it's almost why bother with the Deepsea.

Another way to look at it is if you were to take that money from the purchase of the GMTIIc, you could buy a pretty good used Toyota car. If you were to take the money from the Deepsea, you could buy a brand new Chevy car!!!!

From a personal perspective, I never liked the GMTIIc. I'm a diehard for the SDDS and bought one just this month. It was a no brainer.

Had I not and the prices had gone up, I think I'd think twice about the SDDS as tomorrow it's a 5-figure watch whereas it used to be 4. I'd probably have elected to just keep my old SD4000.

By the way, I love my SDDS and have no regrets about getting it and selling my old SD.
Along with DS and PO Chrono, I'm paying off a LV Sub. Would you get rid of the DS and get the DSSD? The 10K plus for a watch is really a factor for me where I can't justify it. Only two more days to figure this out!
edge591 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 02:08 AM   #17
Whiskey
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 521
Quote:
Originally Posted by edge591 View Post
Along with DS and PO Chrono, I'm paying off a LV Sub. Would you get rid of the DS and get the DSSD? The 10K plus for a watch is really a factor for me where I can't justify it. Only two more days to figure this out!
As stated in my quote, I did get rid of my SD for the DSSD.

Were you asking me if you should get rid of the LV for the DSSD? For myself that would be a no-brainer. Yes I would.

Some people here would think I'm crazy as to many are speculating that the LV watch is not a permanent addition to the Rolex line and may be discontinued at any time and be worth something 30 years from now.

Personally, I don't collect watches and have NO plans whatsoever to do so in the future.

I would also never go into debt for a watch and it sounds like you already are with the LV. Unless you can dump/sell that watch in the next 72 hours, personally, I would not buy another Rolex. But that's just my financial advise.
Whiskey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 02:15 AM   #18
edge591
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 143
No, not in debt at all!
I just opted for a payment plan with no interest for the sub to secure the price. A 15% discount with no interest for a year is great.
I'm in no hurry for the watch....just trying to beat the price increase.
edge591 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 12:33 PM   #19
Rebel
"TRF" Member
 
Rebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,254
GMT IIc. Love that 4th hand.
__________________
-------------------------------
Member of the Nylon Nation
Rebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 12:35 PM   #20
bodybump
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller
 
bodybump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Oscar
Location: Florida
Watch: Me!!!
Posts: 23,233
Deep sea...no doubt!!
Attached Images
 
__________________
bodybump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 12:59 PM   #21
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
As always it's the one you like. Both are fantastic pieces, have their champions,and in their own way bring bring the newest Rolex has to offer to the party.

For me, if were a choice between the two the IIc would win out because it gives me everything I need/want in a watch. Others will pick the DS for the same reasons.

Either will bring a lifetime of happiness if you pick the one that hits your buttons.

.....or both.

mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 01:01 PM   #22
chenx15
"TRF" Member
 
chenx15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 2,891
Mike, again with the pictures... you just like breaking my heart don't you?
__________________
16 GS Titles
16 AMS titles (1 short of Agassi)
23 Consecutive GS semifinals
17/18 of the last GS finals, 237 consecutive weeks #1
5 consecutive wimbledon + 1 = 6 cups
5 consecutive US open
4 Australian open
1 Sweet french open
a crown for every achievement
The Greatest Of All Time loves Rolex
chenx15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.