ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 April 2020, 05:16 AM | #1 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 437
|
Most comfortable submariner reference?
*Sorry for possibly a redundant question but I couldn’t find the thread that really answered this.*
As the title suggests I am looking for a pre-ceramic submariner to daily wear on my 6.5” wrist. I recently bought a 114060 and though I do love it it is on the cusp of too big/heavy to wear daily. I have been looking at all references from 1680 (white dial) all the way through to the 16610 I don't want to spend over $13,000 so the Red Submariner references are out of the question and since I already have a no-date sub I think I want one with a date complication now. Any suggestions!? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
2FA TRF Account |
22 April 2020, 05:20 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
|
How about a 16610LN without lug holes? They are good looking watches and will come with the SELs.
|
22 April 2020, 06:16 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,643
|
14060M is very comfortable.
|
22 April 2020, 06:17 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 361
|
yes, the 14060m is an easy daily wearer!!
|
22 April 2020, 06:19 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
|
22 April 2020, 06:19 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 182
|
is 114060 much heavier than 14060M ? I have Tudor BB58 and its pretty light on my wrist. Right now I am look into 114060 until I read this post.
|
22 April 2020, 06:22 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
|
22 April 2020, 06:26 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: USA
Watch: 1675 GMT and Sub C
Posts: 1,443
|
My 116610LN became worlds more comfortable once I put it on a RubberB strap with OEM bracelet deployment clasp. IMO the rubber is much more comfortable than steel plus there was a significant reduction in weight.
|
22 April 2020, 06:38 AM | #9 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 437
|
Quote:
I was thinking of a vintage watch from the 80's (I was born in 82) but the prices seem steep (I know that's all relative) so perhaps the 14060M is the way to go!
__________________
2FA TRF Account |
|
22 April 2020, 06:54 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: GMT II ceramic
Posts: 1,590
|
1680
__________________
Sky Dweller WG 326139 GMT II 116710LN Submariner 1680 Sold - Daytona 116523; YM 116622; Datejust 16233 |
22 April 2020, 07:28 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 273
|
16610LN is a comfortable watch though
|
22 April 2020, 07:35 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4
|
I have a 6.75" wrist and find the 14060M w/ stock bracelet very comfortable. It is not at all heavy and it looks proportional to my arm. I am looking forward to the next re-design which should have slimmer lugs and all the modern features of the 114060 like glidelock and chromalight, but I think I will still hang on to my 14060m, I like it so much.
|
22 April 2020, 07:45 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 237
|
16610ln
|
22 April 2020, 08:15 AM | #14 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,195
|
Try a 14060M, it is beautifully balanced, and very comfortable.
|
22 April 2020, 08:17 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Dallas
Posts: 268
|
There's an active thread right now where the OP just bought a SD4k because he thought it was more comfortable than a 6 digit sub. Also with a 6.5 - 6.75 wrist.
|
22 April 2020, 09:09 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,288
|
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
22 April 2020, 09:27 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
|
They are all comfy but the new maxi case works best for my 7.75 in wrist.
|
22 April 2020, 04:49 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 422
|
I would be tempted to look at the GMT 5 digit if you like a pre ceramic with date but comfort is an issue.
I have the 14060M and love it, but the comfort of the gmt is better. Smaller crown which never digs into the hand, less weight (opinion, not weighed) and slightly more streamlined. You can also switch out the black insert for a Pepsi or coke! Just my 2p. All the best in your quest. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
22 April 2020, 05:32 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Orlando
Watch: Meteorite
Posts: 494
|
I have the new styles and the older
The most comfortable was the 1680 in my opinion. Since then the rolexes have gone besides my explorer 2 I dive in this, which is comfortable |
22 April 2020, 06:11 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Africa
Posts: 1,127
|
I am lucky to own a 1680, 14060M and a 116610. They all wear very well on my 6.75 wrist, but if you want the lightest option then I would suggest you try the 4 digit references. My 1680 certainly feels lighter (and more flimsy) than the two later models. As an aside, a couple of years back I had the opportunity to try on all the ceramic Sub, Seadweller and Deepsea models back-to-back in an AD. The most comfortable for me was the 114060....which I believe is the one you already own.
|
22 April 2020, 07:09 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 422
|
Perfect reminder for me to put this back on today. Definitely not heavy. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
22 April 2020, 08:14 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,450
|
All non sels subs are might rattle a little, but are super comfortable
|
22 April 2020, 09:10 PM | #23 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 437
|
Quote:
This is very intriguing! I’m a diver so I liked the history (wouldn’t dive in the vintage submariner) of the sub, but I do love the look of the vintage Pepsi and Coke GMT’s! Thanks! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
2FA TRF Account |
|
22 April 2020, 09:12 PM | #24 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 437
|
Quote:
Thanks for the insight in the 4 digit references. I have yet to hold one so I appreciate the info! Here is my 114060! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
2FA TRF Account |
|
22 April 2020, 09:37 PM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 422
|
Quote:
AND...... then you could keep the sub you have. Watches are strange in my experience. I always used to sell to enable me to buy the next one I thought I loved. Boy I do have some mild regrets! The Pepsi is so beautiful, and extremely comfortable. I would say the easiest watch to wear that I own. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.