16710 GMT Master II vs Tudor GMT

[jezec]

Are there videos that show the side-by-side comparison of the two, showing the case shape, bezel colors under the same light, etc...?

Most of the videos compare the Tudor GMT to the 126710, but aesthetically the Tudor GMT actually looks more comparable to the 16710 than the newer ceramic version.

From pictures, they also appear that the Tudor GMT bezel color is closer to the 16710 Coke's rather than the Pepsi's.

[samson66]

I have owned both. Don't have a side-by-side picture but the Tudor is significantly larger. The case diameter, case thickness, lug width and lug-to-lug height are all larger on the Tudor This is what drew me to the Tudor. I always found my 16710 to wear small for my liking.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S10 using Tapatalk

[kieselguhr]

A simple google search yielded this result.


https://youtu.be/cWmhApce5Do

[Crazy Lugs]

It wears slightly larger that a six digit Sub/GMT in my experience, with the inherent aesthetics of a 16710 as you noted. It’s 175g- significantly heavier/thicker that a five digit GMT, but one you can buy new for just under $4,000.

Mine holds its own next to a 114060- it’s more comfortable than expected and the thickness, while an initial concern, doesn’t really bother me at all on my 7.25” wrist. Accuracy is insanely good, and no issues at all with mine.

[B2 Stealth]

Love my Tudor BB GMT--looks nearly identical to Rolex GMTs with aluminum bezel. I own a new BLNR and it's a tough choice which to wear on any given day. The Tudor GMT bezel colors, WOW!

[Swearengen]

16710, Tudor and 1675. Love 'em all