ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

dweller · 19 April 2009, 11:29 PM

Slight variation to recent threads as it pertains to me, which would you choose for daily wear and why?

Currently I wear a Y serial SD, with lug holes ( prefer ) probally 90% of the time, others to mix it up are a 16700 and an old tudor sub..

I REALLY like the maxi dial, not so keen on the green, thus it would be changed to blk, My SD or GMT would have to go, I am thinking the SD because of the similar look to a sub..

Pros for me, the SD

no cyclops, clean looking dial with date
Lug holes

My only con would be a little floppy on the wrist, weight can be a little combersome for me in the warmer months, ususlly solved by switching to a nato or rubber strap.

Pros for LV

a little versatility, green or blk
Maxi dial and hr hand
slightly larger dial
a little lighter on the wirst

only cons would be it's not meant to be blk, and cyclops..

Bisquitlips · 19 April 2009, 11:36 PM

I don't particularly care for the LV and I do love the GMT so I would stand pat.

Chris B · 19 April 2009, 11:38 PM

Personally I'd go for the LV, unlike yourself I really like & need the cyclops, I'd definitely hang on to the 16700 though

karmatp · 19 April 2009, 11:56 PM

Tough one, I love them both. I have always loved the SD and I used to think that I could not wear a LV until I actually put one on my wrist and realised how great they really were. The LV was always one of those watches that I would see pics of and see in my local AD's and I always thought they were cool, but once I actually tried one one it completely changed my outlook on them, they look fantastic on your wrist. I see all your points, and I agree, but if you already have a SD then the LV would make a excellent addition, but I would not part with your SD to obtain one. Best of luck with your decision.

Atomant · 20 April 2009, 01:51 AM

yes a tough choice indeed. Personally the sub has always felt a little lighter due to a slicker case. I feel that the SD's weight is just right for me as I have no use for the cyclops but the maxi dial on the lv is a must have now I am just as confused as you.

RolexCat · 20 April 2009, 03:49 AM

The SD is the watch you will miss if you sell it IMO. Ron

JJ Irani · 20 April 2009, 03:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolexCat

The SD is the watch you will miss if you sell it IMO. Ron

Correct - stick with it!!

View Poll Results: SD or Black LV sub
Stay with SD and current rotation	23	63.89%
Dump SD for LV	7	19.44%
Keep SD dump GMT get LV	6	16.67%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

19 April 2009, 11:29 PM	#1
dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: usa Posts: 249	SD or Blk LV Slight variation to recent threads as it pertains to me, which would you choose for daily wear and why? Currently I wear a Y serial SD, with lug holes ( prefer ) probally 90% of the time, others to mix it up are a 16700 and an old tudor sub.. I REALLY like the maxi dial, not so keen on the green, thus it would be changed to blk, My SD or GMT would have to go, I am thinking the SD because of the similar look to a sub.. Pros for me, the SD no cyclops, clean looking dial with date Lug holes My only con would be a little floppy on the wrist, weight can be a little combersome for me in the warmer months, ususlly solved by switching to a nato or rubber strap. Pros for LV a little versatility, green or blk Maxi dial and hr hand slightly larger dial a little lighter on the wirst only cons would be it's not meant to be blk, and cyclops..

19 April 2009, 11:36 PM	#2
Bisquitlips 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Richard Location: USA Watch: YM Deep Space Posts: 12,521	I don't particularly care for the LV and I do love the GMT so I would stand pat. __________________ Rolex Yacht-Master 40mm (SS-YG / Deep Space MOP) 16623 Breitling Aerospace Titanium / 18K with UTC. Omega Speedmaster 3510.50 Oris TT1 Pro Diver Regulator 43MM

19 April 2009, 11:56 PM	#4
karmatp "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Trevor Location: Arizona Posts: 5,740	Tough one, I love them both. I have always loved the SD and I used to think that I could not wear a LV until I actually put one on my wrist and realised how great they really were. The LV was always one of those watches that I would see pics of and see in my local AD's and I always thought they were cool, but once I actually tried one one it completely changed my outlook on them, they look fantastic on your wrist. I see all your points, and I agree, but if you already have a SD then the LV would make a excellent addition, but I would not part with your SD to obtain one. Best of luck with your decision. __________________ My grails:

20 April 2009, 01:51 AM	#5
Atomant "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Fernwood Posts: 3,455	yes a tough choice indeed. Personally the sub has always felt a little lighter due to a slicker case. I feel that the SD's weight is just right for me as I have no use for the cyclops but the maxi dial on the lv is a must have now I am just as confused as you. __________________ 116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80

19 April 2009, 11:38 PM	#3
Chris B "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Peterborough Posts: 9,631	Personally I'd go for the LV, unlike yourself I really like & need the cyclops, I'd definitely hang on to the 16700 though

20 April 2009, 03:49 AM	#6
RolexCat Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Ron Location: Michigan Watch: SD Posts: 318	The SD is the watch you will miss if you sell it IMO. Ron

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)