|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: 25829 + 26331OR + cash for the 26585CE | |||
| Go for it! |
   
|
43 | 46.24% |
| Keep what you have! Maybe try for a ceramic down the line |
  
|
50 | 53.76% |
| Voters: 93. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
5 December 2020, 08:08 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Egypt
Posts: 62
|
Trading up for a Ceramic Skeleton
Would you trade these 2 pieces + 110k for the Ceramic Perpetual Skeleton?
I find myself with this very tempting but difficult decision.. Id be trading in my yellow gold perpetual skeleton and a new rose gold blue dial chrono + the cash for it.. Would love to hear (read) your thoughts! |
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 08:14 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Texas
Watch: WG Daytona
Posts: 132
|
I personally would not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 08:19 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Texas
Watch: WG Daytona
Posts: 132
|
Seems like you are giving up quite a lot for just that one watch, why not use the 110k and get the ceramic calendar non Skeltonized. Don’t get me wrong the piece you are looking to snag is amazing but just seems like a lot. Just my opinion though
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 08:23 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sarajevo
Posts: 1,929
|
Never... from ownership point of view, not the overhyped new trends and values, I will not give just that beautiful 39 gold perpetual for the ceramic one... and adding to this gold chrono and 110k is pure madness....
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 08:38 AM
|
#5 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Egypt
Posts: 62
|
Quote:
Initially the cash was going to go for a 15407ST. |
|
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 08:57 AM
|
#6 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: nyc
Posts: 6,720
|
no way...
|
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 09:07 AM
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,505
|
No way!!!!
The ceramic is way overhyped. Feels cheap on the wrist compared to SS or PM. Stick to what you have. |
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 09:24 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Sub
Posts: 963
|
Definitely not. Add the non skeletonized ceramic
__________________
GS: SBGP017; IWC: Big Pilot; Omega: PO diamond; RM: 67-02 (Green); Rolex: 16710, 16520, 116509 (TMOP), 116520, 5513, 1680, 16013 (Tiffany stamped), 116610LV, 124300 x 2 (Celebration; Green), 226570 (polar) Oyster Quartz; Tag: Monaco; VC: Patrimony! |
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 09:30 AM
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
|
Those 2 PLUS $110k? LMFAO
No way in the world. |
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 11:29 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: McKinley Stephens
Posts: 88
|
Add a ceramic diver as you don’t have an offshore.
Wouldn’t do that trade personally Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 01:31 PM
|
#11 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,662
|
Not a chance.
|
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 03:41 PM
|
#12 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: miami
Posts: 3
|
no way!!
|
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 04:37 PM
|
#13 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 3,866
|
That YG perpetual calendar is fantastic. As much or more character vs the ceramic, IMO. Would not do that trade.
|
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 04:59 PM
|
#14 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: B.
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 3,622
|
Quote:
 if you have to have a skeleton perpetual, save the money and go for the VC 
__________________
Richard Mille RG RM030 || Richard Mille RM72ti || AP 26240 50TH Green Royal Oak Chrono || AP Royal Oak Off Shore Gulf Blue 26238 || AP Royal Oak Blue JUMBO SS 15202ST || AP ROO Diver Green 15720ST || ♕ Rolex Platinum Daytona Diamond 116506 || Cartier Santos |
|
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 06:29 PM
|
#15 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Stephen
Location: UK
Watch: AP
Posts: 2,646
|
Too high a price to pay in my opinion.
Seems most of the comments here are in agreement, yet the voting says different. A lot of silent ‘yes’ members. Interested to know why they are a yes. |
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 06:38 PM
|
#16 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
|
I think trading those two amazing watches + the cash is too much. I don’t agree that the ceramic feels cheap however, the ceramic has an amazing look and if it isn’t abused will always look new.
 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 07:09 PM
|
#17 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: HK
Watch: Piaget,Rolex,AP,HB
Posts: 1,040
|
I've just bought a skeleton ceramic watch as well, but IMO the calendar really isn't very legible on this model. Not my favourite skeleton watch, so I'd say don't do it
|
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 08:39 PM
|
#18 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: USA
Watch: What I am wearing.
Posts: 1,879
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex │ H. Moser │ F.P. Journe │ Audemars Piquet │ Patek Philippe _______________________________ "I'm not playing hard to get, I'm playing hard to want." |
|
|
|
|
|
5 December 2020, 10:15 PM
|
#19 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,776
|
The sum of one is not greater than the two and cash you would have to give up.
|
|
|
|
|
6 December 2020, 12:12 AM
|
#20 |
|
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: DSSD, SD43, Pepsi,
Posts: 2,084
|
I would do it, but I’m different in that I have EXTRA LOVE for the skeleton. So to me, it’s worth it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
6 December 2020, 02:04 AM
|
#21 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,726
|
Holy smokes that yellow gold perp is incredible.
No way!
__________________
Patek Nautilus 5740G; AP ROC 26315OR; Vacheron Fiftysix; Day Date RG 228235 Olive; Cartier Santos de Cartier Rose Gold |
|
|
|
|
6 December 2020, 02:05 AM
|
#22 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,545
|
Go with what makes you happy. I personally wouldn’t!
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear! |
|
|
|
|
6 December 2020, 02:24 AM
|
#23 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 445
|
I second going with the ceramic perpetual and not the skeleton. Keep what you have. Or sell the rose gold chrono to help pay the difference. Your perpetual calendar is too unique.
|
|
|
|
|
6 December 2020, 03:55 AM
|
#24 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Stateside now
Posts: 190
|
I would get rid of those gold watches and go for the ceramic perpetual, perhaps not necessarily for the skeleton version.
|
|
|
|
|
6 December 2020, 01:48 PM
|
#25 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP
Posts: 232
|
No, would keep what you have and use the cash for something else. As many mentioned, the ceramic perpetual is a great option
|
|
|
|
|
7 December 2020, 08:45 AM
|
#26 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Posts: 4,366
|
I voted keep, but if the cash came down a bit, I’d totally got for it.
|
|
|
|
|
8 December 2020, 02:02 AM
|
#27 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Egypt
Posts: 62
|
Honestly i find the 26579’s dial too monotonous. This is obviously a winner but I’m betting wont be too far off the ceramic perpetual skeleton!
|
|
|
|
|
8 December 2020, 05:15 PM
|
#28 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Netflix
Posts: 3,978
|
It would be tough to let go of the YG but the numbers are right.
If you can swing it keep the YG, but I would do the trade even if you couldn’t . The 26585CE is worth subtracting for. |
|
|
|
|
8 December 2020, 10:03 PM
|
#29 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 433
|
I wouldnt, too much money
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
8 December 2020, 10:32 PM
|
#30 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,097
|
Full disclosure these time pieces are way out of my price league
 That said, I’ve never really got ceramic material in watches. It just doesn’t appeal to me in the least  YMMV
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
