ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

nch209 · 9 May 2009, 02:17 PM

... and I might be wrong

http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Daytona-Wh...3A1%7C294%3A50 But does the first pic not belong??? (Pic at the top of the description)

diablojota · 9 May 2009, 02:47 PM

The pic at the top of the description is not of the same watch. That picture has different hands. Although the picture is also sized incorrectly, giving it the odd oval shape. In addition, the bezel protector is on there as well also giving it a funny look. But you're correct the top pic and the rest of the watch pics are not the same. That said, I do not know if the watch is genuine or not.

What does concern me is that the seller is only selling and buying trivial things as of late and turning around and selling a 9k USD watch...

onkyo · 9 May 2009, 02:51 PM

bad photos but I think the watch is real.

nch209 · 9 May 2009, 03:09 PM

The bottom pics look good, but the top pic in the description is not the same pic as the bottom. The bottom is a Z- but my eyes tell me the top pic ( Second from the VERY top) is older...

What do you all think?

I think the description and the bottom pics are good, but debate the top...

nch209 · 9 May 2009, 03:13 PM

This pic

Name: rnr041.jpg
Views: 35
Size: 52.7 KB

vs

Name: 8769_12.jpg
Views: 34
Size: 20.0 KB

NOT MY PICS, just the ones talked about in the post

onkyo · 9 May 2009, 03:24 PM

You are correct.... top stock photo is a 'thin' hands Daytona (F serial being latest I believe).

The rest (real photos) are 'fat' hands.

diablojota · 9 May 2009, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nch209

The bottom pics look good, but the top pic in the description is not the same pic as the bottom. The bottom is a Z- but my eyes tell me the top pic ( Second from the VERY top) is older...

What do you all think?

I think the description and the bottom pics are good, but debate the top...

Did you not read my post? I said exactly the problem is with the hands and it's not the same watch...

onkyo · 9 May 2009, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diablojota

Did you not read my post? I said exactly the problem is with the hands and it's not the same watch...

Seller stupidly inserted a stock (wrong) photo...

other photos are ok.

Seller should be encouraged to remove incorrect photo.

nch209 · 9 May 2009, 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diablojota

Did you not read my post? I said exactly the problem is with the hands and it's not the same watch...

I did read your post, and my response with pics was rather vague- but I was showing the pics to show the dials being different, not just the hands.

Sorry for the double post.

9 May 2009, 02:17 PM	#1
nch209 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Nathan Location: Northern Virginia Posts: 2,775	Its Late... ... and I might be wrong http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Daytona-Wh...3A1%7C294%3A50 But does the first pic not belong??? (Pic at the top of the description) __________________ nch209

9 May 2009, 02:47 PM	#2
diablojota "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Real Name: Frank Location: Chattanooga, TN Watch: SS Submariner Date Posts: 4,042	The pic at the top of the description is not of the same watch. That picture has different hands. Although the picture is also sized incorrectly, giving it the odd oval shape. In addition, the bezel protector is on there as well also giving it a funny look. But you're correct the top pic and the rest of the watch pics are not the same. That said, I do not know if the watch is genuine or not. What does concern me is that the seller is only selling and buying trivial things as of late and turning around and selling a 9k USD watch... __________________ RTFT - Read The Friggin' Thread FcB

9 May 2009, 03:09 PM	#4
nch209 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Nathan Location: Northern Virginia Posts: 2,775	The bottom pics look good, but the top pic in the description is not the same pic as the bottom. The bottom is a Z- but my eyes tell me the top pic ( Second from the VERY top) is older... What do you all think? I think the description and the bottom pics are good, but debate the top... __________________ nch209

9 May 2009, 03:13 PM	#5
nch209 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Nathan Location: Northern Virginia Posts: 2,775	This pic vs NOT MY PICS, just the ones talked about in the post __________________ nch209

9 May 2009, 02:51 PM	#3
onkyo Banned Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Pav Location: Manhattan Posts: 11,495	bad photos but I think the watch is real.

9 May 2009, 03:24 PM	#6
onkyo Banned Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Pav Location: Manhattan Posts: 11,495	You are correct.... top stock photo is a 'thin' hands Daytona (F serial being latest I believe). The rest (real photos) are 'fat' hands.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)