ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 May 2022, 10:57 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: HOME!
Posts: 1,175
|
16710 - Spot the difference
There is something different about my 2003 16710. It didn’t look like this from the factory and there may not be many others that look like it (yet). Can any eagle-eyed TRFers see what it is?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
29 May 2022, 11:38 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 1,071
|
Minute markers by Swiss made have 5 lines as opposed to 3?
Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk |
30 May 2022, 12:43 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Juho
Location: Finland
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 1,914
|
Mine has a different bracelet.
__________________
My Luxury Watch Reviews Blog |
30 May 2022, 12:49 AM | #4 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,485
|
Except for the triangle marker at '12' on the bezel, most/all of the other numbers on the bezel don't appear to be lined up correctly with the hour markers on the dial. It could be the angle of the watch to the camera, but it doesn't look right.
|
30 May 2022, 12:53 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Juho
Location: Finland
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 1,914
|
It's just the picture. The watch looks ok.
The font is just different than mine. Rolex does change the fonts even among the same serial.
__________________
My Luxury Watch Reviews Blog |
30 May 2022, 01:01 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: HOME!
Posts: 1,175
|
It’s none of the above. Here’s a clue. This is how it left the factory before the change.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
30 May 2022, 01:08 AM | #7 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,485
|
The current photo (in your first post above) appears to show *less* reflections on the date magnifier than the original 2003 photo (immediately above)?
|
30 May 2022, 01:19 AM | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: HOME!
Posts: 1,175
|
Quote:
Went in for service at RSC St James recently and I was asked what I thought of the watch. I said it was perfect apart from the fact the date was much harder to read than the date on my Sub LV. The tech looked on the system and said that all new replacement 16710 crystals had “recently” been given the full modern AR treatment so they’d be able to fit one if I wanted. It’s a big difference when glancing down at the date. Massive improvement. |
|
30 May 2022, 01:32 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Al
Location: USA
Posts: 1,550
|
Quote:
|
|
30 May 2022, 01:34 AM | #10 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,485
|
Quote:
|
|
30 May 2022, 01:35 AM | #11 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: HOME!
Posts: 1,175
|
Quote:
Think it was only £100 or so. |
|
30 May 2022, 10:36 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: California
Posts: 1,250
|
I just did the same with my 16710. I had it in for service with a local independent (they have a Rolex parts account) and they swapped the crystal out for one with AR at my request. It has such a cleaner look now.
|
30 May 2022, 03:50 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Space
Watch: 16570, black
Posts: 965
|
Is there now AR coating on the underside of the entire crystal, or just the magnifier? Did the original crystal have any AR coating?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.