ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 September 2022, 06:05 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Real Name: Gareth
Location: UK
Watch: SD43, BB Pro
Posts: 40
|
There’s not a lot wrong with the BB Pro
I picked up the BB Pro a few months ago and I was struck immediately by the colours. What doesn’t come across that well in photos is how coordinated the colours are: charcoal dial, almost sand-brown lume and a really subtle and barely yellow GMT hand. You’ll think I’m mad, but the colour scheme and the Explorer-feel evoke something of North Africa to me - sand and desert. It works so well - and without any hint to me of fautina or anything contrived. Yes there’s a ton of 1655 in there, but the BB Pros is its own watch. Crucial to me with any watch is being in proportion - and Tudor have this right too - it feels compact, purposeful and the bezel feels really sharply etched and precise. T fit clasp feels crisp and smooth and finishes off this fine package.
|
12 September 2022, 06:28 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Texas
Watch: 126610LV
Posts: 283
|
I love it and look forward to seeing it in person. Sadly I already know the case is too thick for me.
|
12 September 2022, 07:07 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,218
|
I don’t like the faux everything … faded 24 hour hand, patina, etc. and, I don’t like it trying to look like a 1655.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
12 September 2022, 07:23 AM | #4 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Real Name: A-Aron
Location: Utah
Watch: 126710BLNR 226570
Posts: 2,226
|
I think the general forum and media consensus is that it's "flaw" if you will, is it's thickness, especially considering its 39mm footprint.
There are a few "homage haters" here and there and already one youtuber claiming a date wheel issue, but apart from that, this thing seems universally loved by everyone. I'd go goo goo over a white dial version. Thanks for sharing your impressions OP and enjoy the watch! |
12 September 2022, 08:25 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: In a handbasket
Posts: 1,268
|
I beg to differ, there is A LOT wrong with it...
It's too small for my wrist !!! J/K, it's a fantastic watch. I might reconsider the size if they ever release a white dial version.
__________________
"Look, he’s winding up the watch of his wit; by and by it will strike." W.S. |
12 September 2022, 09:01 AM | #6 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Real Name: A-Aron
Location: Utah
Watch: 126710BLNR 226570
Posts: 2,226
|
Quote:
So you want something similar, just larger and with a white dial. There's a list for that!!!! |
|
12 September 2022, 09:14 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: In a handbasket
Posts: 1,268
|
Quote:
Indeed there is and I'm on it! But unfortunately there's only 2 AD's within 100 miles of me...
__________________
"Look, he’s winding up the watch of his wit; by and by it will strike." W.S. |
|
12 September 2022, 06:58 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Home
Watch: Patek Aquanaut
Posts: 837
|
|
12 September 2022, 06:58 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 832
|
I’m looking forward to seeing and handling one in person. There is an lot to like about this watch for sure
|
12 September 2022, 08:23 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Spain
Posts: 112
|
The thickness looks bad on the paper, but once you have it on your hand I think it's fine. If I didn't already have an Explorer II I would be getting a BB Pro for sure.
|
12 September 2022, 11:32 PM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 1,139
|
The thickness is a non-issue if you actually own and wear it. I don’t see any faux patina, but it’s obviously heavily based on the 1655. I have a dozen Rolex’s and have worn my BBP more than any other watch since I got it. Total home run by Tudor.
|
13 September 2022, 11:24 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Justin
Location: Miami, Fl
Watch: Daytona 116515B
Posts: 727
|
I have not had any issues with the thickness and think it’s a great watch!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
ALS 1815 Flyback Chrono Rosegold, Daytona 116515B RG/Chocolate, SkyD Blue Dial Jubilee 326934, Sub 122610LV, Explorer II 216570 Polar, Blue Yacht Master 40 126622, Tudor BB Pro, BB925 Silver, Breitling W. Navi A24322 White, Speedy 3861, Tissot PRX 80 |
13 September 2022, 12:09 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: US
Posts: 2,219
|
Thickness is personal for sure. This watch compared to Explorer II is substantially thicker.
|
13 September 2022, 12:39 PM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Real Name: Jay
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 326934
Posts: 2,319
|
Being I own one of the thickest watches in a DSSD, I really wanted to like the BB Pro but it somehow felt even less balanced. Lots to like about it, but I ended up getting the Tudor Ranger instead as my new daily.
|
13 September 2022, 12:39 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 4,656
|
There’s not a lot wrong with the BB Pro
I have a relatively normal wrist, maybe 7 inches, and it wears perfectly. I hate faux patina but this thing is different. I don’t mind the call back to the 1655, and it certainly has a lot of vintage in it. I was extremely concerned about the thickness, but after a few days i forgot about it. I think they did an unbelievable job, its a toss up for my favorite Tudor between the BB pro and the 58. They did a lot right IMO.
If the case thickness was 12.5 like the explorer 2, it would be essentially perfect to me. But i don’t mind the extra thickness, it takes the focus away from my belly. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.