ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 July 2009, 08:59 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
Single Red Deep Sea
I just wanted your thoughts on this Single Red Deep Sea.
|
24 July 2009, 09:01 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: At what TIME?!!!
Watch: the SKY tonite!
Posts: 3,225
|
Smashing!!!
|
24 July 2009, 10:22 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
The watch has a DLC coating on it. I think the DLC is also a perk of buying this watch which I don't believe comes from the Rolex factory. I am not sure I would want a coating that may peel off in the future. I don't know if that is possible or not but its a concern.
|
24 July 2009, 10:43 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
I prefer the original
|
24 July 2009, 10:44 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
There are some who think that this is the Deep Sea that Rolex should have released but they didn't so it's not.
I expect it to carry a BIG premium over the price of a proper Deep Sea and I think Rolex might suggest that you send it back to the modifier if it ever required warranty work or a service. I am not sure if Rolex would work on it knowing that it had been stripped down coated and re-dialed etc. I like the 'DEEPSEA' in red but not the coating.
__________________
E |
24 July 2009, 11:43 AM | #6 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
reply
Quote:
|
|
24 July 2009, 01:53 PM | #7 | |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Oscar
Location: Florida
Watch: Me!!!
Posts: 23,233
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
24 July 2009, 03:07 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
I agree with the others - the red lettering is beautiful, not sure about the coating.
|
24 July 2009, 03:28 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beach in the Med
Watch: Hunting ...
Posts: 1,148
|
Looks pretty hard-core, but unless its gonna be a safe-queen, that coating will scratch and start to look very tatty
|
24 July 2009, 06:33 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
I'd rather have the original...for the price of a DSSD! =)
Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
24 July 2009, 06:53 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: EEC
Watch: Daytona & Deepsea
Posts: 2,387
|
Stick to the original issue , it is cheaper and in 30 years time it will still look good and will have gained in value . All "homemade" modifications will not. I'm happy with my original and will wait till Rolex produces their next sea dweller maybe the "Abyss" 11000 m in red lettering????
|
24 July 2009, 07:16 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,428
|
Damn, that looks sweet. If I had the money, I'd buy one. I love the coating.
__________________
|
24 July 2009, 07:20 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Matt
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,046
|
I love it. Apart from the coating, but the red writing looks amazing.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 16610 LV 'M'. Rolex Submariner 16610 'M'. Rolex Sea-Dweller 126600. Omega Seamaster 2226.80.00. Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 2907.50.91 . |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.