The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 April 2023, 08:33 PM   #1
sinkholeninja
"TRF" Member
 
sinkholeninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Zeus
Location: London
Watch: Ocean 2000
Posts: 1,032
BVL 138 Movement Downgrade?

I was in the market for a titanium Octo Finissimo and just realised that Bvlgari rolled out a new version of the BVL 138 calibre with a smaller jewel count, simpler base plate design and lesser finishing!? Here are the pictures of the original and new version of the movement. What’s really disappointing is that on their official website, Bvlgari still shows older/original movement for all their Octo Finissimo watches.
Attached Images
   
__________________
Lange (ref. Saxonia Thin RG); Vacheron C. (ref. 3110v); Ressence (ref. Type 8); Rolex Explorer (ref. 124270); Rolex Sub (ref. 126610LV); Porsche Design IWC (ref. Ocean 2000); Seiko (ref. SLA039)
sinkholeninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2023, 11:11 PM   #2
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 21,163
Have the original Octo FS blue here and yes imho the older movement is more visually attractive than the updated version. Tho the updated version could be more reliable. The original uses jewels as spacers, so as I heard takes more watchmaker hours / effort. Yes the gold highlights have been removed on the newer movement. Of note is some did have problems with the original movement as it pertains to 'jumping' seconds hand, and I could be wrong but maybe winding problems too ???? though mine has been problem free and has been on bicycle rides, the beach, ocean swims....

Reliability is probably higher on the updated movement. The titanium model is beautiful, go for it
__________________
__________________

----> Was Great Seeing Everyone At The TRF December 9 Tampa Meetup <----
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=968133

Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school.
www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2023, 12:00 AM   #3
Aferrariguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 56
Wow. Looks like a major downgrade and way less finishing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Aferrariguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2023, 12:45 AM   #4
sinkholeninja
"TRF" Member
 
sinkholeninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Zeus
Location: London
Watch: Ocean 2000
Posts: 1,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aferrariguy View Post
Wow. Looks like a major downgrade and way less finishing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, finishing wise definitely a letdown.
__________________
Lange (ref. Saxonia Thin RG); Vacheron C. (ref. 3110v); Ressence (ref. Type 8); Rolex Explorer (ref. 124270); Rolex Sub (ref. 126610LV); Porsche Design IWC (ref. Ocean 2000); Seiko (ref. SLA039)
sinkholeninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2023, 12:47 AM   #5
sinkholeninja
"TRF" Member
 
sinkholeninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Zeus
Location: London
Watch: Ocean 2000
Posts: 1,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by enjoythemusic View Post
Have the original Octo FS blue here and yes imho the older movement is more visually attractive than the updated version. Tho the updated version could be more reliable. The original uses jewels as spacers, so as I heard takes more watchmaker hours / effort. Yes the gold highlights have been removed on the newer movement. Of note is some did have problems with the original movement as it pertains to 'jumping' seconds hand, and I could be wrong but maybe winding problems too ???? though mine has been problem free and has been on bicycle rides, the beach, ocean swims....

Reliability is probably higher on the updated movement. The titanium model is beautiful, go for it
Useful feedback, thanks. I haven’t heard or read about any issues with the origin version of the movement. Finishing level is definitely higher on it compared to the latest iteration.
__________________
Lange (ref. Saxonia Thin RG); Vacheron C. (ref. 3110v); Ressence (ref. Type 8); Rolex Explorer (ref. 124270); Rolex Sub (ref. 126610LV); Porsche Design IWC (ref. Ocean 2000); Seiko (ref. SLA039)
sinkholeninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2023, 04:50 AM   #6
ajw45
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NYC
Posts: 462
Yup. I don't think there's any brand above playing dirty these days. Bulgari claimed the updates make the movement better/more efficient/more reliable and a better base for complications but it is definitely been cheapened from an aesthetics perspective.
ajw45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2023, 05:55 AM   #7
sinkholeninja
"TRF" Member
 
sinkholeninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Zeus
Location: London
Watch: Ocean 2000
Posts: 1,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajw45 View Post
Yup. I don't think there's any brand above playing dirty these days. Bulgari claimed the updates make the movement better/more efficient/more reliable and a better base for complications but it is definitely been cheapened from an aesthetics perspective.
Very disappointing especially considering that this “silent update” isn’t reflected on Bvlgari’s website. All Octo Finissimo references still show old movement.
__________________
Lange (ref. Saxonia Thin RG); Vacheron C. (ref. 3110v); Ressence (ref. Type 8); Rolex Explorer (ref. 124270); Rolex Sub (ref. 126610LV); Porsche Design IWC (ref. Ocean 2000); Seiko (ref. SLA039)
sinkholeninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2023, 07:39 AM   #8
Aferrariguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 56
Maybe real pictures will change my opinion, but the new movement looks hideous. They covered everything up with poorly finished bridges


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Aferrariguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2023, 07:44 AM   #9
WatchEater666
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,982
Mine had to be sent back due to winding issues. The rotor wasn’t winding the watch, and manually winding it didn’t work either. So I get why they changed it.
WatchEater666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2023, 09:49 AM   #10
aquawatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 21
Bulgari taking a page from the Panerai playbook. Bold strategy Cotton, let's see if it pays off.
aquawatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2023, 05:02 PM   #11
sinkholeninja
"TRF" Member
 
sinkholeninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Zeus
Location: London
Watch: Ocean 2000
Posts: 1,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aferrariguy View Post
Maybe real pictures will change my opinion, but the new movement looks hideous. They covered everything up with poorly finished bridges


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree 100%
__________________
Lange (ref. Saxonia Thin RG); Vacheron C. (ref. 3110v); Ressence (ref. Type 8); Rolex Explorer (ref. 124270); Rolex Sub (ref. 126610LV); Porsche Design IWC (ref. Ocean 2000); Seiko (ref. SLA039)
sinkholeninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2023, 09:52 PM   #12
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by aquawatch View Post
Bulgari taking a page from the Panerai playbook. Bold strategy Cotton, let's see if it pays off.

Crazy move if you consider the ground they made up in the first 4-5 years with the OF line. They broke through the ceiling and genuinely had the attention of watch geeks. I had the chrono gmt for a few years and that was easily the most fringe brand I’ve owned in terms of being a pure watchmaker.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2023, 01:44 AM   #13
sinkholeninja
"TRF" Member
 
sinkholeninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Zeus
Location: London
Watch: Ocean 2000
Posts: 1,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Crazy move if you consider the ground they made up in the first 4-5 years with the OF line. They broke through the ceiling and genuinely had the attention of watch geeks. I had the chrono gmt for a few years and that was easily the most fringe brand I’ve owned in terms of being a pure watchmaker.
Indeed. It’s puzzling why they would do this other than for cost cutting reasons perhaps?
__________________
Lange (ref. Saxonia Thin RG); Vacheron C. (ref. 3110v); Ressence (ref. Type 8); Rolex Explorer (ref. 124270); Rolex Sub (ref. 126610LV); Porsche Design IWC (ref. Ocean 2000); Seiko (ref. SLA039)
sinkholeninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2023, 01:57 AM   #14
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 21,163
Have a feeling Bvlgari tweaked the movement for higher reliability / ease of watchmaker effort as i stated earlier. As for movement decoration changes, agreed that appears to be a cost-cutting effort. You could look for older versions with the previous movement as the long warranty period means odds are there's plenty of warranty still remaining.
__________________
__________________

----> Was Great Seeing Everyone At The TRF December 9 Tampa Meetup <----
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=968133

Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school.
www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2023, 05:09 PM   #15
sinkholeninja
"TRF" Member
 
sinkholeninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Zeus
Location: London
Watch: Ocean 2000
Posts: 1,032
UPDATE:

Thanks to a very helpful Bvlgari BVL 138 manufacturing video from WatchAdvisor, the latest iteration (gen. 2) of the calibre seems to be an upgrade, at least in terms of performance and reliability, because aesthetically speaking I personally think that gen. 1 looks better. Here are the details:

1. REDISIGNED AUTOMATIC SYSTEM: winding efficiency improved by approximately 40%
The new system is incorporating the developments from another record-breaking Bulgari caliber - an ultra-thin automatic chronograph movement BVL 318. With a micro-rotor with contiguous balls being able on its own to withstand all the shocks without using a limiting bridge. Inverters replaced by a single 2-way inverter identical to BVL 318 caliber.

2. CLOSED BARREL: improved distribution of energy
The closed barrel allows us to control each barrel independently of the movement in order to introduce compliant controlled barrels into our production flow.
The closed barrel also guarantees better torque variation and better efficiency, beneficial to the oscillator.

3. NEW ESCAPEMENT AND BALANCE WHEEL:
adjustment and stability of the movement improved
The entire escapement line has been revoked, achieving a stricter level of tolerance, from the plate to the anchor bridge, by adjusting more finely the clearance of the balance wheel a s well.

4. MONOBLOC CONSTRUCTION: new construction for an optimized production flow
The reduced number of components - 208 in the new version compared to 242 components in the initial version - and of jewels - 31 versus 35 - allow for an optimized production flow. This new construction has made it possible to eliminate the use of some components, such as the roller (a jewel without a hole used to adiust the clearance of different functions - barrel, ratchet, micro-rotor, reverser) and to guarantee the proper functioning of all parts without necessarily relying on any particular retouching or adjustment.
__________________
Lange (ref. Saxonia Thin RG); Vacheron C. (ref. 3110v); Ressence (ref. Type 8); Rolex Explorer (ref. 124270); Rolex Sub (ref. 126610LV); Porsche Design IWC (ref. Ocean 2000); Seiko (ref. SLA039)
sinkholeninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.