The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

View Poll Results: Is the Oysterflex worth it?
Yes.. with comments 214 66.05%
No... with comments 110 33.95%
Voters: 324. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 September 2023, 12:50 AM   #1
JPS
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: UK
Watch: 116500 White&Black
Posts: 1,360
Is the Oysterflex worth it.. or?

Been toying with the idea of dipping into one of the Oysterflex models - namely the Daytona & just interested to hear people's thoughts & experiences on the Oysterflex "bracelet" - yes I know Rolex insists on calling it a bracelet so I'll keep to the same flow here.

I know many people say for the money you're going to spend on a PM Rolex anyway, it almost seems crazy to have it on a strap when you may as well go full hog with the full PM bracelet as well.

Thoughts...
JPS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 12:57 AM   #2
m j b
"TRF" Member
 
m j b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: RTP, NC, USA
Watch: ♕& Ω
Posts: 5,215
Sorry, it's just stupid to put a rubber band on a gold watch.
__________________
Enjoy life - it has an expiration date.


Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds...
m j b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 12:59 AM   #3
pearson1995
"TRF" Member
 
pearson1995's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: England
Posts: 939
Quote:
Originally Posted by m j b View Post
Sorry, it's just stupid to put a rubber band on a gold watch.
I’d say it makes slightly more sense than putting a leather strap on a 150m wr Royal Oak offshore. But I do agree, a weird combination. Have to say though I do think the black and gold is aesthetic.
__________________
The collection is never complete
pearson1995 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 01:52 AM   #4
vliberman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: los angeles
Posts: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by m j b View Post
Sorry, it's just stupid to put a rubber band on a gold watch.
Stupid is a wrong assessment. Rubber offers all the advantages including cost, weight, comfort and many others. Particularly the way Rolex does it where it is a true bracelet. The only disadvantage would be looks such is subjective. You certainly would not suggest something to be stupid purely on the aesthetic, would u?
vliberman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 01:57 AM   #5
Driver8
"TRF" Member
 
Driver8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by vliberman View Post
Stupid is a wrong assessment. Rubber offers all the advantages including cost, weight, comfort and many others. Particularly the way Rolex does it where it is a true bracelet. The only disadvantage would be looks such is subjective. You certainly would not suggest something to be stupid purely on the aesthetic, would u?
I'd also add "longevity" (compared to a metal bracelet) as another disadvantage because with the best will in the world, rubber will never last as long as a metal bracelet.
__________________
Rolex - 116710BLNR : 116610LN : 116622 : 116334 : 14060M
(Plus - Glashutte Original, Breitling, Omega, IWC, Tag Heuer, Doxa, Sinn, Seiko, G-Shock + micros)
Driver8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 04:10 AM   #6
Dsmith1974
"TRF" Member
 
Dsmith1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by m j b View Post
Sorry, it's just stupid to put a rubber band on a gold watch.
Not if it has significant water resistance. Take the PP aquanaut for example.
The only thing that puts me off oysterflex is the huge metal clasp. Looks a bit disjoint to me.

Sent from my SM-S908B using Tapatalk
Dsmith1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 06:50 AM   #7
Solo118
2024 Pledge Member
 
Solo118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by m j b View Post
Sorry, it's just stupid to put a rubber band on a gold watch.
That is your opinion. IMHO the Daytona on strap is a beautiful watch, and the only way to get ceramic on PM without going platinum or the Le Mans.

That being said, personally I am not comfortable wearing a full gold piece daily, but the strap/ceramic really come together nicely and dare I say somewhat low key. I also happen to love how chronographs on straps just work.

That being said, something does not rub me right about the Sky Dweller, I think that should have stayed on leather, but the Daytona and YM truly rock my world!
Solo118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 09:55 AM   #8
THC
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
THC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Mandeville La
Watch: 126333
Posts: 10,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by m j b View Post
Sorry, it's just stupid to put a rubber band on a gold watch.
I am totally in this camp… 40k for a Daytona on rubber makes me think of Rolex execs laughing all the way to the Swiss bank

If they were reasonably priced due to the rubber band I would like it better
THC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 10:23 AM   #9
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by THC View Post
I am totally in this camp… 40k for a Daytona on rubber makes me think of Rolex execs laughing all the way to the Swiss bank

If they were reasonably priced due to the rubber band I would like it better
There's no way I could wear a Sky D on other than the OF bracelet. I'm really happy to have this alternative as well as a significant reduction in cost of $7K.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 12:40 PM   #10
Socalwatchguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: SoCal
Posts: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by THC View Post
I am totally in this camp… 40k for a Daytona on rubber makes me think of Rolex execs laughing all the way to the Swiss bank

If they were reasonably priced due to the rubber band I would like it better

40k for Daytona on OF? What prices are you looking at?
OF is a significant discount over their full PM counterparts.

With that being said, I believe OF is a great option for certain models... Daytona & YM in particular.

Personally, I love OF so much that I have also converted my sub to OF. Lots of compliments on that setup.
Socalwatchguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 09:21 PM   #11
THC
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
THC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Mandeville La
Watch: 126333
Posts: 10,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Socalwatchguy View Post
40k for Daytona on OF? What prices are you looking at?
OF is a significant discount over their full PM counterparts.

With that being said, I believe OF is a great option for certain models... Daytona & YM in particular.

Personally, I love OF so much that I have also converted my sub to OF. Lots of compliments on that setup.
There are currently 6 Daytona OF on DSW site over 40k… a few are over 50k
While I know that is not MSRP, I rest my case your honor
THC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2023, 12:50 AM   #12
Socalwatchguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: SoCal
Posts: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by THC View Post
There are currently 6 Daytona OF on DSW site over 40k… a few are over 50k
While I know that is not MSRP, I rest my case your honor
Haha! Again, full PM counter parts are 5-10k more expensive on the grey too.
Socalwatchguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2023, 10:50 PM   #13
Calatrava r
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 11,416
Quote:
Originally Posted by m j b View Post
Sorry, it's just stupid to put a rubber band on a gold watch.
This sums it up best.
Calatrava r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2023, 11:15 PM   #14
Easy E
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: GA
Posts: 5,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by m j b View Post
Sorry, it's just stupid to put a rubber band on a gold watch.
Agree.
Easy E is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2023, 02:12 AM   #15
RollingInTheDeep
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: TX
Posts: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by m j b View Post
Sorry, it's just stupid to put a rubber band on a gold watch.
Technically, it's flexible titanium-nickel alloy wrapped with high-density elastomer.
RollingInTheDeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2023, 02:23 AM   #16
Rolexken
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: England
Posts: 821
Quote:
Originally Posted by m j b View Post
Sorry, it's just stupid to put a rubber band on a gold watch.
Yes agree no better than a nato imo.
Rolexken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2023, 02:34 AM   #17
Maleg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Real Name: G
Location: Illinois
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by m j b View Post
Sorry, it's just stupid to put a rubber band on a gold watch.
Agree completely.

Rubber looks awesome on my G Shock. Not so much on a gold watch.

You do you, though.
Maleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2024, 12:52 PM   #18
horseco
"TRF" Member
 
horseco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by m j b View Post
Sorry, it's just stupid to put a rubber band on a gold watch.
AMEN ! yea yea Patek & AP do it i know... but it dont make it right !
horseco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 12:59 AM   #19
garyk
2024 Pledge Member
 
garyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Gary
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 11,748
I like the contrast and the practicality of the rubber strap. I don’t own one but have updated some other watches with similar straps and I like them a lot…
__________________
garyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 01:01 AM   #20
watchtabs
"TRF" Member
 
watchtabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Charlie
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,534
I love it on the YM.
__________________
I have all the grails I could ever want, but the hunt will always continue .


watchtabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 01:04 AM   #21
jamesbondOO7
"TRF" Member
 
jamesbondOO7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: BondJamesBond
Location: The Algarve
Watch: Rolex or nothing
Posts: 4,081
Does not make sense to me. For me anyway a Rolex has a metal bracelet.
__________________
♛ 5-digit Rolex or nothing ♛
jamesbondOO7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2023, 05:51 AM   #22
KatGirl
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KatGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 7,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7 View Post
Does not make sense to me. For me anyway a Rolex has a metal bracelet.

I totally agree. I don’t get the rubber strap on a chrono. It does makes a little more sense on a Yachtmaster, but I wouldn’t choose that configuration, either.

Kat


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
KatGirl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 01:17 AM   #23
the_Hunter
"TRF" Member
 
the_Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Dallas, Tx
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 659
I love my Oyster Flex Daytona. To me you get the some of the weight of a gold model but its a little more casual than a solid PM watch. They are great for the summer as well as the rubber bracelet is super comfortable
__________________
Instagram: MR.HGB03
the_Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 01:21 AM   #24
ltmgeller
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
ltmgeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 22,574
I love it on my YM42
__________________
Oh, look at the time...
Official Member: 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas International GTG 2019
ltmgeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2024, 04:34 AM   #25
Robf52
"TRF" Member
 
Robf52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Sunshine State
Watch: lots of Rolex
Posts: 5,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by ltmgeller View Post
I love it on my YM42
Ditto for my YM40.
__________________
126610LV//116508 Daytona YG Black/Champagne
116655 YM40 Everose Oysterflex//126622 YM40 Blue//126600 SD43
126710BLNR//126711CHNR
126334 DJ41 Rhodium/Diamonds//126331 DJ41 TT Wimbledon
124300 OP41 Green//126334 DJ41Mint Green
Robf52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 01:24 AM   #26
Hoppyjr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 441
Buy on bracelet, add one of the aftermarket fitted rubber straps to scratch that itch.

I did it on a Sub 114060 (using RubberB) and a spare Glidelock clasp I managed to pick up. While the clasp is difficult to source, they make the straps with tang buckle too.

I cannot imagine the OysterFlex being measurably better.

Hoppyjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 01:42 AM   #27
piratfisk
"TRF" Member
 
piratfisk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Jake
Location: Slam Diego
Watch: 16233, 116619LB
Posts: 2,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoppyjr View Post
Buy on bracelet, add one of the aftermarket fitted rubber straps to scratch that itch.

I did it on a Sub 114060 (using RubberB) and a spare Glidelock clasp I managed to pick up. While the clasp is difficult to source, they make the straps with tang buckle too.

I cannot imagine the OysterFlex being measurably better.

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...722b8ced75.jpg
OP, this is what I'd do. I'd always rather a Rolex on a bracelet. If I was going to, say, dive with it, I'd put it on an OF or aftermarket rubber. I appreciate that Rolex have put metal into their rubber, but for the kind of diving that I do, I don't think it'd be in danger of being sliced off my wrist. When I dive (not with my Sub), I have a NATO strap, FWIW.
__________________
What's the time? It's time to get ill.

Wishlist: 128236; 16202BC; 5396G
piratfisk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 01:53 AM   #28
the_Hunter
"TRF" Member
 
the_Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Dallas, Tx
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 659
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoppyjr View Post

I cannot imagine the OysterFlex being measurably better.
The "fins" on the Oysterflex make all the difference in both fit and comfort
__________________
Instagram: MR.HGB03
the_Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 01:25 AM   #29
HMHM
"TRF" Member
 
HMHM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: HM
Location: 🇲🇾
Posts: 2,477
Once you get the fit right, it is one of the very best watches Rolex have ever made.
HMHM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2023, 01:33 AM   #30
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 21,161
Imho Rolex should offer the ability for us to have both the rubber and metal bracelet.
__________________
__________________

----> Was Great Seeing Everyone At The TRF December 9 Tampa Meetup <----
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=968133

Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school.
www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.