ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Tools · 28 August 2009, 04:00 AM

Blasphemy... or something that Rolex ought to do themselves.......

JJ Irani · 28 August 2009, 04:01 AM

That's so beautiful, Larry. Wish every Rolex came standard with a clear caseback.

JJ

iSellJerseyShore · 28 August 2009, 04:02 AM

Maybe on dress models

, but certainly not to any of the tool watches

!

-Frankie

Wolfgang427 · 28 August 2009, 04:11 AM

No.

I prefer to look at the dial of the watch more then the back of it.

JJ Irani · 28 August 2009, 04:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wolfgang427

No.

I prefer to look at the dial of the watch more then the back of it.

You only look at the back when you're bored at work and have nothing better to do, Wolfgang!!!

greekbum · 28 August 2009, 04:16 AM

If the movement where more decorated it would be nicer to stare at when bored.Some like it some dont.

AWATCH · 28 August 2009, 04:18 AM

I like it, i think the clear back should be a readily available option.

BBH · 28 August 2009, 04:20 AM

Blasphemy. I can't imagine that modification would be acceptable in a Sub or DS.

sexner · 28 August 2009, 04:26 AM

I like it.

Being one that appreciates all things mechanical, I could see myself having a peek at the heart of my fine timepiece occasionally.

sammiepug · 28 August 2009, 04:29 AM

if it comes optional, yeah maybe, I will still have a hardtime convincing to get that 'option' LOL

brochblue72 · 28 August 2009, 04:36 AM

it's nice but as others have said, the movement isn't much of a looker!
Would be a nice option on dress watches such as DD but not on a sports model.

Armand · 28 August 2009, 04:37 AM

I like it!

I can very well imagine to put it on one of mines!

With partial Rolex guarantee ( at least to 50 m ) would be nice, though!

But it will never happen, as it would force Rolex to better their movements cosmetically

;-/

Hermann

Omega_Precision · 28 August 2009, 04:38 AM

Larry you are such a purist!

I don't like it either because I think it's tinkering with Rolex's design but if they like it, it's their watch.

I wonder if it affects depth rating when that is done.

STEELINOX · 28 August 2009, 04:41 AM

excellent !

ocwatching · 28 August 2009, 04:48 AM

I like it. Rolex makes its own movements and there is nothing wrong with showing that off...
I do agree, it makes it less of a TOOL watch...

B. Doggy · 28 August 2009, 04:53 AM

It's not the sexiest movement in the world, so I would say blasphemy. Just doesn't seem Rolex to me.

Tools · 28 August 2009, 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omega_Precision

Larry you are such a purist!

I don't like it either because I think it's tinkering with Rolex's design but if they like it, it's their watch.

I wonder if it affects depth rating when that is done.

It pressure checked just fine..

As a matter of fact, this design is tested by the maker at 200m..

Art 1 · 28 August 2009, 05:21 AM

Not I.

Numismatist · 28 August 2009, 05:22 AM

Blasphemy UNLESS Rolex does it!

Then it's really cool and I want one!

Submarino · 28 August 2009, 05:25 AM

I found a guy online that did the same thing to his Daytona and I really liked it. Considering the beauty of the caliber inside a Daytona I could understand why someone would do that, now, thinking about an Explorer or other sports models. Not sure. .

Rebel · 28 August 2009, 05:43 AM

Not me.

rkb · 28 August 2009, 06:07 AM

I like it, Rolex should offer this as an option. My thinking if they can make the front waterproof that they should be able to make the back the same. Plus, if Rolex is going to hike prices again, I think they will have to rub a little funk on the line to liven up their offerings. Think about it, my Explorer I has a MSRP of 5050US, for a watch that has only hour minutes and seconds. Also, if Rolex made the crystal case backs, just think of the potentially very cool things they could do with that canvas.

Rockrolex · 28 August 2009, 06:17 AM

I see nothing wrong with clear casebacks. I've got a GP, a JLC, and a Glycine with clear casebacks. Do I ever look at them? Nooo. So a lot of good they do me.

Brushpup · 28 August 2009, 06:25 AM

I love it Larry,

The movement I want to see the most is always hidden..........except for a few of these I've seen. I say

Alcan · 28 August 2009, 06:40 AM

"Who Would Do This To Their Rolex....."

I would.

RedBaronF2001 · 28 August 2009, 06:44 AM

Rolex movements are pretty, but not this pretty:

Therefore, I prefer solid casebacks on mine.

escudoturbo · 28 August 2009, 06:45 AM

Clear casebacks would looks nice, apart from on sub/seadwellers with the pressure thing, maybe gertan dress models would look nice with 'no face' also giving a skeleton look.

dkpw · 28 August 2009, 06:54 AM

Very nice Larry - but not for me. I just can't see myself sitting and looking at the movement.

I'm on the point of buying a Speedmaster, which arguably has a more visually entertaining and aesthetically pleasing movement, but even that does not sway me away from the classic MoonWatch.

Alan111 · 28 August 2009, 07:05 AM

I think Rolex should give the consumer the choice and make it a no-cost option.

Jason71 · 28 August 2009, 07:25 AM

Mind you.........I am DEFINITELY in the camp of modding your Rolex...........However......

Like others have said, I think it would be fine for the dressier models, but keep them off divers if nothing else.

28 August 2009, 04:00 AM	#1
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,514	Who Would Do This To Their Rolex..... Blasphemy... or something that Rolex ought to do themselves....... __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

28 August 2009, 04:01 AM	#2
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	That's so beautiful, Larry. Wish every Rolex came standard with a clear caseback. JJ __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

28 August 2009, 04:16 AM	#6
greekbum "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Nikos Location: Florida Watch: Rolex GMT 16750 Posts: 8,418	If the movement where more decorated it would be nicer to stare at when bored.Some like it some dont. __________________ Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting

28 August 2009, 04:26 AM	#9
sexner "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: 4Q Location: Nowhere near you Watch: 169622, 124060 Posts: 2,014	I like it. Being one that appreciates all things mechanical, I could see myself having a peek at the heart of my fine timepiece occasionally. __________________ One should endeavor to do what is right not what is established.

28 August 2009, 04:36 AM	#11
brochblue72 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Aberdeenshire UK Watch: seadweller deepsea Posts: 119	it's nice but as others have said, the movement isn't much of a looker! Would be a nice option on dress watches such as DD but not on a sports model. __________________ Tag Kirium Chrono, Omega Seamaster, Rolex Sea Dweller Deepsea.

28 August 2009, 04:02 AM	#3
iSellJerseyShore "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Frankie Location: NJ - JerseyShore Watch: GMT-Master IIc Posts: 1,023	Maybe on dress models , but certainly not to any of the tool watches ! -Frankie

28 August 2009, 04:11 AM	#4
Wolfgang427 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Wolfgang Location: New Jersey. Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega Posts: 5,592	No. I prefer to look at the dial of the watch more then the back of it.

28 August 2009, 04:18 AM	#7
AWATCH "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: al Location: GEORGIA Watch: Explorer II Posts: 1,759	I like it, i think the clear back should be a readily available option.

28 August 2009, 04:20 AM	#8
BBH "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Florida Posts: 86	Blasphemy. I can't imagine that modification would be acceptable in a Sub or DS.

28 August 2009, 04:29 AM	#10
sammiepug Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: USA Watch: V series SS Sub Posts: 92	if it comes optional, yeah maybe, I will still have a hardtime convincing to get that 'option' LOL

28 August 2009, 04:37 AM	#12
Armand Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Hermann Location: Middle of Europe Watch: 16710/3185 16613 B Posts: 413	Luv clear backs! I like it! I can very well imagine to put it on one of mines! With partial Rolex guarantee ( at least to 50 m ) would be nice, though! But it will never happen, as it would force Rolex to better their movements cosmetically ;-/ Hermann

28 August 2009, 04:38 AM	#13
Omega_Precision Banned Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Henry Location: CA, US Watch: ing basketball Posts: 2,977	Larry you are such a purist! I don't like it either because I think it's tinkering with Rolex's design but if they like it, it's their watch. I wonder if it affects depth rating when that is done.

28 August 2009, 04:41 AM	#14
STEELINOX 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Sink-O! Location: a praire in AZ Watch: ROLEX-less atm... Posts: 14,021	excellent !

28 August 2009, 04:48 AM	#15
ocwatching "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Phil Location: CA Posts: 5,374	I like it. Rolex makes its own movements and there is nothing wrong with showing that off... I do agree, it makes it less of a TOOL watch... __________________ too much into watches...

28 August 2009, 04:53 AM	#16
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	It's not the sexiest movement in the world, so I would say blasphemy. Just doesn't seem Rolex to me. __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

28 August 2009, 05:21 AM	#18
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	Not I.

28 August 2009, 05:22 AM	#19
Numismatist "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Chris Location: Camden ME & STT Watch: 116600 Posts: 6,350	Blasphemy UNLESS Rolex does it! Then it's really cool and I want one! __________________ Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP

28 August 2009, 05:25 AM	#20
Submarino "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Mr. H Location: Dallas Watch: them for me! Posts: 7,180	I found a guy online that did the same thing to his Daytona and I really liked it. Considering the beauty of the caliber inside a Daytona I could understand why someone would do that, now, thinking about an Explorer or other sports models. Not sure. . __________________ WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

28 August 2009, 05:43 AM	#21
Rebel "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail Location: New Albany Watch: Tudor Sub 75090 Posts: 8,254	Not me. __________________ ------------------------------- Member of the Nylon Nation

28 August 2009, 06:07 AM	#22
rkb "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Russell Location: Seattle Metro Watch: EXPORER II Posts: 605	I like it, Rolex should offer this as an option. My thinking if they can make the front waterproof that they should be able to make the back the same. Plus, if Rolex is going to hike prices again, I think they will have to rub a little funk on the line to liven up their offerings. Think about it, my Explorer I has a MSRP of 5050US, for a watch that has only hour minutes and seconds. Also, if Rolex made the crystal case backs, just think of the potentially very cool things they could do with that canvas. __________________

28 August 2009, 06:17 AM	#23
Rockrolex TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: God Location: Washington, D.C. Watch: What do you think? Posts: 37,968	I see nothing wrong with clear casebacks. I've got a GP, a JLC, and a Glycine with clear casebacks. Do I ever look at them? Nooo. So a lot of good they do me. __________________ Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular. *Tosser Cabinet Member* Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019

28 August 2009, 06:25 AM	#24
Brushpup "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: Patrick Location: Texas Watch: what I'm wearing Posts: 5,943	I love it Larry, The movement I want to see the most is always hidden..........except for a few of these I've seen. I say __________________ *TRFs "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron-Founding Member* PClub # 10 74,592 The safest place for your watch is on your wrist.

28 August 2009, 06:40 AM	#25
Alcan 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Al Location: Way Up North Watch: your P's & Q's Posts: 10,473	"Who Would Do This To Their Rolex....." I would. Attached Images __________________ Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!

28 August 2009, 06:44 AM	#26
RedBaronF2001 Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: Nashville, TN Posts: 575	Rolex movements are pretty, but not this pretty: Therefore, I prefer solid casebacks on mine.

28 August 2009, 06:45 AM	#27
escudoturbo "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Baz Location: U.K Watch: Explorer II Posts: 364	Clear casebacks would looks nice, apart from on sub/seadwellers with the pressure thing, maybe gertan dress models would look nice with 'no face' also giving a skeleton look.

28 August 2009, 06:54 AM	#28
dkpw "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: David Location: Scotland Watch: 16610 & 214270 Posts: 1,294	Very nice Larry - but not for me. I just can't see myself sitting and looking at the movement. I'm on the point of buying a Speedmaster, which arguably has a more visually entertaining and aesthetically pleasing movement, but even that does not sway me away from the classic MoonWatch. __________________ Sub 16610, Explorer 214270, Ω Speedy Pro & many others. David

28 August 2009, 07:05 AM	#29
Alan111 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: NYC Posts: 1,605	I think Rolex should give the consumer the choice and make it a no-cost option.

28 August 2009, 07:25 AM	#30
Jason71 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Jason Location: USA Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers Posts: 7,973	Mind you.........I am DEFINITELY in the camp of modding your Rolex...........However...... Like others have said, I think it would be fine for the dressier models, but keep them off divers if nothing else. __________________ Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)