ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

NewYorker · 3 September 2009, 12:11 PM

the asymmetry of Pateks being sold in the For Sale forum for $40,000 to $70,000, with only iPhone photos attached? At best, it's slightly amusing, at worst it seems pretty dubious.

Any legitimate excuse for a seller of expensive watches to not at least use the Macro function on a crappy point and shoot camera? It's like trying to sell a million dollar house, but leaving dirty underwear strewn during the Open House.

diablojota · 3 September 2009, 12:14 PM

You do realize the guy listing those PPs is the same one who sold Steve (Lol-x) his vintage Explorer II right? The guy is totally legit.

train-time · 3 September 2009, 12:23 PM

The guy you are referring to is John E. Brozek, publisher of "The Rolex Report."

greekbum · 3 September 2009, 12:24 PM

I was going to buy 1 of his light boxes 1 day but if that's how the pics come out

diablojota · 3 September 2009, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by greekbum

I was going to buy 1 of his light boxes 1 day but if that's how the pics come out

Lol!!! The iPhone camera is still not quite as good as a legit point and shoot with macro setting. Especially in low light conditions.

The seller that the OP is referring to is completely legitimate and one of the few true rolex experts, IMO.

NewYorker · 3 September 2009, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diablojota

Lol!!! The iPhone camera is still not quite as good as a legit point and shoot with macro setting. Especially in low light conditions.

The seller that the OP is referring to is completely legitimate and one of the few true rolex experts, IMO.

Oh okay, then it's slightly amusing as opposed to dubious - thanks.

I have this really great watch to sell, it's usually $75,000, but I've got it available for only $70,000. Here's a really grainy photo of it on a camera that happened to come with my phone. Call with any questions!

diablojota · 3 September 2009, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewYorker

Oh okay, then it's slightly amusing as opposed to dubious - thanks.

I have this really great watch to sell, it's usually $75,000, but I've got it available for only $70,000. Here's a really grainy photo of it on a camera that happened to come with my phone. Call with any questions!

Sometimes you just want to get them up and on the table. If I'm not home and wanted to sell something I would do that. I am going to list a few items on eBay here soon, but I loaned my cameras to my parents for their vacation. While my iPhone can take good pics, I am going to hold off until then. But I do see your point. However, the bottom line is to buy the seller, and in this case the seller is tops, IMO.

kyle L · 3 September 2009, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diablojota

Sometimes you just want to get them up and on the table. If I'm not home and wanted to sell something I would do that. I am going to list a few items on eBay here soon, but I loaned my cameras to my parents for their vacation. While my iPhone can take good pics, I am going to hold off until then. But I do see your point. However, the bottom line is to buy the seller, and in this case the seller is tops, IMO.

DanP · 3 September 2009, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewYorker

Oh okay, then it's slightly amusing as opposed to dubious - thanks.

I have this really great watch to sell, it's usually $75,000, but I've got it available for only $70,000. Here's a really grainy photo of it on a camera that happened to come with my phone. Call with any questions!

ummm

Launch Mini · 3 September 2009, 02:11 PM

SOLD, ROF
Will they accept a photo of a cashiers check?

sexner · 4 September 2009, 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Launch Mini

SOLD, ROF
Will they accept a photo of a cashiers check?

Only if it's a REALLY good one not a grainy one taken with an iphone.

NewYorker · 4 September 2009, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sexner

Only if it's a REALLY good one not a grainy one taken with an iphone.

Gotta be priced in the $40,000 to $70,000 range as well.

iphone picture of the check is fine too, but I prefer etch-a-sketch.

DanP · 4 September 2009, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewYorker

Gotta be priced in the $40,000 to $70,000 range as well.

iphone picture of the check is fine too, but I prefer etch-a-sketch.

RMFAO

GBJIV · 4 September 2009, 01:14 PM

I see your point however - for me - If I knew I was buying a watch from John - I would buy it from him simply on his description. I wouldn't even need a photo.

sakuraba · 4 September 2009, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBJIV

I see your point however - for me - If I knew I was buying a watch from John - I would buy it from him simply on his description. I wouldn't even need a photo.

+1

John Brozek can sell based on reputation alone. You won't get e-screwed!

3 September 2009, 12:11 PM	#1
NewYorker Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Manhattan Watch: GMT IIc Posts: 60	Anybody else notice... the asymmetry of Pateks being sold in the For Sale forum for $40,000 to $70,000, with only iPhone photos attached? At best, it's slightly amusing, at worst it seems pretty dubious. Any legitimate excuse for a seller of expensive watches to not at least use the Macro function on a crappy point and shoot camera? It's like trying to sell a million dollar house, but leaving dirty underwear strewn during the Open House.

3 September 2009, 12:14 PM	#2
diablojota "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Real Name: Frank Location: Chattanooga, TN Watch: SS Submariner Date Posts: 4,042	You do realize the guy listing those PPs is the same one who sold Steve (Lol-x) his vintage Explorer II right? The guy is totally legit. __________________ RTFT - Read The Friggin' Thread FcB

3 September 2009, 12:24 PM	#4
greekbum "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Nikos Location: Florida Watch: Rolex GMT 16750 Posts: 8,418	I was going to buy 1 of his light boxes 1 day but if that's how the pics come out __________________ Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting

3 September 2009, 02:11 PM	#10
Launch Mini "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Real Name: John Location: Canada, eh Watch: can I? Posts: 6,240	SOLD, ROF Will they accept a photo of a cashiers check? __________________ Something witty to go here. Member # 293

4 September 2009, 01:14 PM	#14
GBJIV "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Jackson Location: So. California Posts: 2,893	I see your point however - for me - If I knew I was buying a watch from John - I would buy it from him simply on his description. I wouldn't even need a photo. __________________ Jackson

3 September 2009, 12:23 PM	#3
train-time 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Plankton Location: US Watch: less Posts: 4,161	The guy you are referring to is John E. Brozek, publisher of "The Rolex Report."

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)