|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 September 2009, 09:39 PM
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
|
Bracelet too shiny
|
|
|
|
5 September 2009, 09:43 PM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: VK2 - AUS
Watch: 5513s
Posts: 7,380
|
good catch....I would also say fake....bracelet links also NOT decreasing in size....
|
|
|
|
|
5 September 2009, 09:46 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
|
Quote:
Ohhhh, I missed that....Aftermarket maybe...I'm going to report it. |
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2009, 03:02 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Florida, US
Watch: du jour
Posts: 1,815
|
Not sure what flaw you see in the bracelet links??? The polished center links look like they were done amateurishly by the owner.
|
|
|
|
6 September 2009, 03:10 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,418
|
Guys IMHO the owner polished it out to be shinny.I see this all the time some people get it allmost chrome looking.It doesn't mean its fake
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting 
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2009, 05:40 AM
|
#6 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
Quote:
Or it may be aftermarket.... can't tell for sure. As long as no Rolex wording or markings on it, its ok. |
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2009, 07:06 AM
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
|
It doesn't look like an original bracelet at all. As mentioned above, the links do not appear to decrease in size, maybe it's the camera angle, but it definitely looks wrong. Either way, I have held off reporting it because I'm not 100% sure.
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2009, 07:19 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Florida, US
Watch: du jour
Posts: 1,815
|
When you look at the other pictures, it shows that the bracelet does taper. It's been polished and reflects light at the camera, so it's harder to see. No reason to believe there is anything wrong with this watch.
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2009, 07:42 AM
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
|
Yup, now that I lok a little closer I notice it looks different depending on the photo you look at. Still, IMO the bracelet looks like crap but the watch is authentic. I guess I'm just a bit overzealous.
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2009, 07:49 AM
|
#10 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2009, 02:56 PM
|
#11 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Australia
Watch: DJ16233TT
Posts: 18,485
|
Quote:
__________________
Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth  
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
