ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

watchfreak2003 · 7 September 2009, 09:15 AM

Maybe it’s just my imagination (or old eyes) but I think the dial on the GMT looks a tiny bit larger than the SDDS.
More space from the minute and second hands to the chapter ring on the GMT - provided that the hands are exactly same size (like the “old” Sub, GMT and SD).

MarJnK · 7 September 2009, 11:24 AM

When i compared them at the AD, I thought they were identical size, in fact I thought the dial was exactly the same with only the printing being different.

7 September 2009, 09:15 AM	#1
watchfreak2003 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Real Name: Jesper Geisler Location: Cph. Denmark Posts: 362	GMT II Ceramic dial vs. Deepsea dial >>>> Maybe it’s just my imagination (or old eyes) but I think the dial on the GMT looks a tiny bit larger than the SDDS. More space from the minute and second hands to the chapter ring on the GMT - provided that the hands are exactly same size (like the “old” Sub, GMT and SD).

7 September 2009, 11:24 AM	#2
MarJnK Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Mark Location: Canada Watch: Deepsea Posts: 184	When i compared them at the AD, I thought they were identical size, in fact I thought the dial was exactly the same with only the printing being different.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)