ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 October 2009, 01:09 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 143
|
40mm PAM....Bad Choice???
I'm looking at a white faced watch and my choices are slim.
Rolex has the Explorer II and Panerai has the 113 or the smaller 40mm version, 49 I believe. One is manual and one is automatic, one has a date and the other none but it's the size that I am most concerned about. I have various watches (rolex and Omega) ranging from 40mm to 45.5mm and I really don't want another big watch. If I buy the 40mm will it be a mistake? How does the 40mm PAM 49 compare to a Rolex Explorer II at 40mm? Does the PAM look bigger or smaller without the bezel etc...? I don't have a PAM dealer here where I live so I have to base part of my decision on pictures. If you have them then please send them along with your thoughts. |
11 October 2009, 02:07 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
Buying any PAM can hardly be described as a mistake.However,I would stress buying a 44,not a 40.This is a common question from the first time PAM buyer.Most of my fellow members on this forum will also tell you to go for a 44 rather.They wear very well on the wrist.
A white dial PAM ... my wife wears a 113 and it looks great on her.For myself a black dial on a PAM looks better.A 113 can be a second PAM,an alternative, but not the first one. Here is what I suggest .... 111 (005,000,112) or if you need a date a 104/312 or 233.You simply cannot go wrong on any of those.All GREAT choices !! Good luck !! |
11 October 2009, 04:33 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Carlo
Location: Philippines
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 444
|
the best thing with a pam is that your not restricted to one bracelet or strap as compared to rolex explorer....
But i suggest you get a 44mm.... |
11 October 2009, 05:06 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 578
|
If you prefer a 40mm PAM then it's not a mistake. That said however, if you're the kind of person that likes to flip watches, you'll probably have a much tougher time unloading a 40mm PAM since the vast majority of Panerai fans seem to prefer the 44mm.
__________________
__________________________________________ "I'm a man of simple tastes, easily satisfied with the best." |
11 October 2009, 11:20 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
44mm no doubt
Cheers
__________________
|
12 October 2009, 01:15 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
Take it from a guy that owned a 40mm Panerai. I flipped it after only a few months and I now have a 44mm watch that I love! PAM's are meant to be large watches and it is a part of their DNA. Good luck!
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
12 October 2009, 02:55 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 475
|
I would go for the 44mm unless you have super small wrists.
I actually like the 113 and 114 a lot. You can also try the 251 (off-white chrono with date.) There is also a slightly older white-dialed Daylight chrono model that looks great if you go the used route. My wife has the 40mm white dialed pam and loves it. I have tried it on (as I love all things panerai!) but it honestly didn't work like the larger ones. |
12 October 2009, 03:27 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
|
|
12 October 2009, 06:34 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 475
|
|
12 October 2009, 11:36 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Jay
Location: NJ
Watch: aholic
Posts: 726
|
It's only a mistake if YOU don't like it
__________________
-Jay |
12 October 2009, 12:13 PM | #11 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Oscar
Location: Florida
Watch: Me!!!
Posts: 23,233
|
IMO 44 is the size know for panerai...and i would not buy a 40mm panerai...but thats just me...some people still wants the 40mm size..because it fits them prefectly....have you ever tried them on??
__________________
|
12 October 2009, 12:41 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 56
|
How big is your wrist? At 6.5" on a BIG day, I went with 40mm and feel REALLY good about it. I don't care about the flipping argument, as I don't plan to flip any of my watches, ESPECIALLY my PAM 48.
Try both on, buy what YOU like more! |
12 October 2009, 09:43 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
40 is nice, but 44 is PERFECT!!!
|
12 October 2009, 10:14 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 143
|
7.25" I have a Omega PO Chrono that is 45.5mm and it fits fine so my wrists can handle the big watches. The PAM 49 has the date which I like and the 113 does not. So, what to do.....???
|
13 October 2009, 12:08 PM | #15 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
There isn't a 44mm version of the 49? Huh, who knew. (I'm a Panerai noob, so I didn't!) |
|
13 October 2009, 12:42 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
Man, I hope this thread convinces you to go 44mm. If you're a watch guy and appreciate history, buying a 40mm PAM would be considered a sin. Take your time with the decision. Good luck and buy what you LOVE!!
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
13 October 2009, 01:31 PM | #17 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
Only real men wear 44mm or something? In this poster's case 44mm certainly seems like a good option, but for many of us 40mm is where it's at. 40mm and proud PAM owner here!!! |
|
13 October 2009, 01:36 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
|
14 October 2009, 02:43 AM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Boston North
Watch: Meteorite Daytona
Posts: 1,471
|
44mm is the typical and historic size for a PAM. I've spoken to my AD about this is he claims that nearly 100% of people who buy 40mm regret is very quickly.
I ended up with a 251 Daylight which has a cream color face. I love it because it goes with a lot of different color straps, ie baby blue, bright green etc that don't look great with a black face. A black face with a simple dial is on my list though.
__________________
Pepsi GMT/SD43/DSSD Blue/ DJ41 TT Rose Diamond Dial/ Daytona Meteorite/ SS Sky Dweller White Dial/ IWC Bronze Big Pilot/ Aquanautic Super King / Omega Ploprof 1200 / Graham Scarab Diver |
14 October 2009, 06:56 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
|
I chose a 40mm Pam, and I am very happy with it. I have tried on several 44 mm Pams and personally I just don't like them on my wrist. In my opinion a watch should be easily readable and easily wearable, and the 44 mm tips too far into the too heavy/ not wearable range for me. They're gorgeous, but not for me.
So, I would encourage you to do what I did and buck the trend. Just because the 44 mm size is the most popular, that doesn't make it the best. My 40 mm goes great with jeans but is perfectly at home in a suit, where it fits nicely under the sleeve. Good luck. |
14 October 2009, 07:47 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Houston
Watch: BP FF Bathyscaphe
Posts: 116
|
I'm another 40mm owner (model 50 with bracelet) and I love it.
I have a 6" wrist, though. So 44 is really truly too big for moi. |
15 November 2009, 08:28 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Boris
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 3,521
|
if you have a small wrists go with 40 mm
|
15 November 2009, 08:36 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
|
what size is your wrist? I have 6.8" wrist and 44mm works (IMHO)...
but I do agree...any larger would look funny on me... good luck in your choice
__________________
too much into watches... |
15 November 2009, 10:19 AM | #24 |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
I went though the same dilema buying my first Panerai. I ended up buying a PAM 125 (40mm) but after 3 months debating whether i should have bought a 44mm, i gave in and bought a PAM 171 and never looked back. The 40mm just doesnt have the same presence
|
15 November 2009, 10:30 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: in a dream world
Posts: 488
|
The 40mm wears much largr due to the crown guard which isn't included in the measurements.
44mm is more historic? I thought the original Marina Militare watches were 47mm in diameter?
__________________
18k GMTIIc, II,16013 DJ, PAM 112, Patek ref 96J, Helson Bronze, Elgin Trench, Gruen Curvex, Omega F300 and a few others...... |
15 November 2009, 10:31 AM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Pep
Location: Miami
Watch: GMTIIc, Pam320
Posts: 2,773
|
Quote:
I have a 244. I love the fact that it fits my wrist perfectly. I was the 88 now, but just because I want a 44mm, but wouldn't want to part with my 244
__________________
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -Benjamin Franklin Prick #8 |
|
18 November 2009, 01:52 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Monica
Posts: 4
|
I recently pulled the trigger on the 88 after trying both the 88 and 244 on back and forth for a week. In the end, the 244 looked too average. I mean 40MM is the size of my sea-dweller. I have small wrists btw. I'm down to the last hole on the Panerai strap but it looks fine.
|
18 November 2009, 03:40 AM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Steven
Location: Florida
Watch: 1) Rolex TT Dayton
Posts: 193
|
x2
|
20 November 2009, 04:45 AM | #29 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,962
|
i went to my local AD and tried on both 40mm (it was a chrono, i forgot which one) and 44mm PAM (24 and 25). i have to say 40mm has a more "regular/normal" fit but it didn't feel right for me. it felt small for a PAM. i agree that PAM meant to be big :)
|
20 November 2009, 06:47 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Joey
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: SS Sub 16610 M
Posts: 3,824
|
It just feels small for a Pam. The 44 fits me but any larger for a Luminor case and I'm out.
__________________
Current Rotation: Rolex Submariner Date (M) - 1/08, Rolex Milgauss GV (V) - 2/10, Rolex SS Black Daytona (V) - 6/10, Rolex GMTIIC (G) - 5/11, TAG Heuer Silverstone (286/1860) - 1/2015 Former-watches: Omega PO/2535.80/2254, TAG Carrera/F1x2/Monaco, Panerai 312K/292L Wish List: Panerai 270/505, Rolex SMURF, Rolex RG Daytona, Rolex DSSD |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.