The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 October 2009, 08:26 PM   #1
ro-lex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 71
Rolex Super Luminova useless after 2 years

Is this normal ?..On my TT Sub 2007..it becomes brilliant after being in daylight, but within 15 mins in dull light it has no lume left, so at night there is absolutely nothing to be seen.
ro-lex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 08:35 PM   #2
rkammer
"TRF" Member
 
rkammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by ro-lex View Post
Is this normal ?..On my TT Sub 2007..it becomes brilliant after being in daylight, but within 15 mins in dull light it has no lume left, so at night there is absolutely nothing to be seen.
Hmmm, not good. I have a 14060 from 2003 and it still glows brightly after exposure to light. The glow does diminish in the dark but, the dial and hands are still readable 4 or 5 hours later. Did you buy your TT brand new?
__________________
Regards,
Ray K.
rkammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 08:52 PM   #3
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
Suposedly, superluminova does not degrade over time like the old tritium. It does seem like my older watches do not glow as brightly after an hour or two. I would try this test if I were you:

Take your watch and keep it under a fluorescent light bulb for 5 minutes before going to bed. Wear your watch to bed. If you wake up from time to time during the night (like I do) then check the luminosity at that time. (since your eyes will be adjusted to the darkness)

I bet that you will be able to see the luminosity a bit better and read the time.
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 09:15 PM   #4
ro-lex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 71
Thanks all, not bought new, only a recent purchase , and Rolex refuse to say date it was sold , (Data protection excuse ...had same response in past trying to find when another Rolex was last serviced) or I would have tried under Warranty. I will try florescent bulb test and see if any sign !
ro-lex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 12:16 AM   #5
rkammer
"TRF" Member
 
rkammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by ro-lex View Post
Thanks all, not bought new, only a recent purchase , and Rolex refuse to say date it was sold , (Data protection excuse ...had same response in past trying to find when another Rolex was last serviced) or I would have tried under Warranty. I will try florescent bulb test and see if any sign !
Take a look at the very bottom of the dial. Here is what you should read:

1) SWISS - T <25

OR

2) SWISS

OR

3) SWISS MADE

If you see #1 your watch was made prior to about 1999 and used Tritium for illumination and the tritium has long since worn out.
If you see #2 your watch was made about 1999 or 2000 and had Luminova and won't glow as brightly as the newer ones but should still glow.
If you see #3 your watch has Super Luminova and should still glow brightly.

Let us know which you have.
__________________
Regards,
Ray K.
rkammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 12:48 AM   #6
BASSETHOUNDS
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Tristan
Location: GIRONA , SPAIN
Watch: 116520/660/710/334
Posts: 7,147
Doesn't sound good , any way with my F-reg ( thin hands ) SS.Daytona I never saw what time it was after dark . lume is absolutely useless on that watch , superluminova or not . I have seen other Daytona's with "fat hands" they do seem a bit better but not that much better .
BASSETHOUNDS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 12:53 AM   #7
jrssv
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 386
I keep a Surefire flashlight by my bed. I shine it close to my watch for a minute or two before turning out the light. My 2005 LV is good until I get up at 6:00. I don't think it gets enough light on cloudy days or under a shirt sleeve. Now if I could lounge on the beach all day I bet it would be different.
jrssv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 02:31 AM   #8
ro-lex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 71
Hello all , its "SWISS MADE" 2007 Serial no Z259xxx thanks for all advice
ro-lex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 10:42 AM   #9
smc
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: canada
Watch: 16610 - Y
Posts: 95
Moisture will degrade Super Luminova. Pretty much anything else (light/air etc) will not. Is it possible that it got wet/humid inside?

SMCx
smc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 10:48 AM   #10
Nick1959
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex DSSD
Posts: 558
I am not big fan of rolex luminova. So I end up taking my Luminox to bed with me
__________________
Regards,
Nick
Rolex Oyster Perpetual, DSSD,TT GMT IIC Daytona SS Breitling Chronomat
CX 20000 Swiss Military,Longine Grande
Nick1959 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 10:52 AM   #11
R1@160@alltimes
"TRF" Member
 
R1@160@alltimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: ♛
Posts: 4,408
I have no issues with Rolex lume.
__________________
R1@160@alltimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 04:47 PM   #12
RsqVet
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 142
I would take tritium any day over luminova, I do not get much readable time out of mine and worse all the random times I go to read it it seems even weaker.
RsqVet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 06:17 PM   #13
DanP
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Dan P
Location: Vancouver. Canada
Watch: GV-U-Kno-Me :)
Posts: 2,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by R1@160@alltimes View Post
I have no issues with Rolex lume.
X2 Same school.
Or Havent yet so far

Dan
DanP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 07:06 PM   #14
Bullyterrier
"TRF" Member
 
Bullyterrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
I don't think the lume is as good on my subs than my old OMP or my citizen diver. But then again the maxi dial on my LV is better than my sub non date.
__________________
So Mote it be.
Bullyterrier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2009, 02:38 AM   #15
Sub'erman
"TRF" Member
 
Sub'erman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: SK
Location: Greenland
Watch: Various SUBs
Posts: 473
Had my 16613 Blues brother tritium-dial in the vault for a year. I thought that the tritium was dead, but surpricingly it has regained its lume and is readable during the night...

My Sub 14060 from 92 is still luming after some convincing LED-light exposion...
My 16610, GMT II C and SD haven't changed and are still Superluminating...

Regards

SK
Sub'erman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2009, 07:06 AM   #16
tinstar
"TRF" Member
 
tinstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southwest
Posts: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrssv View Post
I keep a Surefire flashlight by my bed. I shine it close to my watch for a minute or two before turning out the light. My 2005 LV is good until I get up at 6:00. I don't think it gets enough light on cloudy days or under a shirt sleeve. Now if I could lounge on the beach all day I bet it would be different.
That's funny!

I thought I was the only one that did that Surefire trick!
__________________
1991 GMT-II Coke 2007 Exp II White
2007 GMT-IIc
2008 Sub Date
2008 Seadweller
2ea. 2008 GMT-II 3186 Coke (late "M")
tinstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2009, 07:07 AM   #17
tinstar
"TRF" Member
 
tinstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southwest
Posts: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsqvet View Post
i would take tritium any day over luminova, i do not get much readable time out of mine and worse all the random times i go to read it it seems even weaker.
x2
__________________
1991 GMT-II Coke 2007 Exp II White
2007 GMT-IIc
2008 Sub Date
2008 Seadweller
2ea. 2008 GMT-II 3186 Coke (late "M")
tinstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2009, 07:57 AM   #18
JeffCB
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Glastonbury CT US
Watch: Rolex Exp 2 - Blk
Posts: 7
Confused by some of the responses. I have an "X-series" Exp 2 with a tritium dial (T<25) and the glow is continuous regardless of how recently it was exposed to light. Probably not as bright as when it was new but still quite readable. I believe that tritium "glows" naturally as it burns-down its half-life, unlike Super-Lume which absorbs and then slowly releases light. Am I correct?

Jeff B
Exp 2 - 90s vintage (on a Nato now - sorry JJ)
Air King - 80s vintage (wife wears it - looks good!)
G-Shock G2300B-1V (chain saw, paint stripping, etc.)
Seiko 6139-6002 (original owner - worn rarely)
Bovet Freres - probably early 50s (father's - worn rarely
JeffCB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2009, 08:06 AM   #19
vitix
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: magneeleVE
Location: Usa
Watch: magneeleVE
Posts: 2,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkammer View Post
Take a look at the very bottom of the dial. Here is what you should read:

1) SWISS - T <25

OR

2) SWISS

OR

3) SWISS MADE

If you see #1 your watch was made prior to about 1999 and used Tritium for illumination and the tritium has long since worn out.
If you see #2 your watch was made about 1999 or 2000 and had Luminova and won't glow as brightly as the newer ones but should still glow.
If you see #3 your watch has Super Luminova and should still glow brightly.

Let us know which you have.
wow... how do you know all this stuffs.....
vitix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2009, 04:20 PM   #20
rkammer
"TRF" Member
 
rkammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by vitix View Post
wow... how do you know all this stuffs.....
I read lots of posts and use the search engine frequently.
__________________
Regards,
Ray K.
rkammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 November 2009, 03:43 AM   #21
BlackpoolRolexCoaste
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: John T
Location: Benidorm, Spain
Watch: Blue sub & SS Sub
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick1959 View Post
I am not big fan of rolex luminova. So I end up taking my Luminox to bed with me

x2
I wear a traser to bed for the same reason.
BlackpoolRolexCoaste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2009, 01:56 AM   #22
Blue Lantern
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Watch: Tudor 79190
Posts: 366
Instead of starting a new thread, I wanted to say that on my 14060M, the lume on the dial and hands seems to be a little brighter than the pearl. I wonder if that's common?
Blue Lantern is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.