The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 October 2017, 07:16 AM   #1
j0oftheworld
"TRF" Member
 
j0oftheworld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Jason
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 269
Ideal daily Sub..

Wondering about input on a daily worn Sub.
I've always been a classics fan, truer to original size/shape, and there seems to be plenty out there in great condition.
Obvious advantages to the current Ref. the warranty and ceramic bezel.
So what piece would be best for daily wear and abuse from those who've put serious miles on each?
Thanks!
j0oftheworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 07:19 AM   #2
Tangier11
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Paul
Location: Southern Virginia
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 2,544
Part of the great part of owning a Rolex is they are built like a tank. They are all tough, you will be fine
Tangier11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 07:36 AM   #3
Swiss Mad!
"TRF" Member
 
Swiss Mad!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Max
Location: UK
Watch: Various
Posts: 3,727
Deffo Ceramic.
The bezel will stand more knocks and bangs with less chance of damage than its alluminium counterpart.
Also, the glidelock is a godsend on a hot day.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
__________________

instagram: max.parkin
Swiss Mad! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 08:02 AM   #4
rushca01
"TRF" Member
 
rushca01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,754
Any 5 or 6 digit reference should handle the task nicely. If you like classic with some modern touches look at a late model 5 digit, the glidelock though on the 6 digit is a huge bonus.
rushca01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 08:07 AM   #5
slide13
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Here
Posts: 1,004
114060 was my choice. Glidelock is amazing and made me love a bracelet for the first time. Wear it every day.
slide13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 08:14 AM   #6
machob55
"TRF" Member
 
machob55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: US
Posts: 1,119
I have a 14060 in mint condition I love it, it's a superb watch. But from my understanding of the Sub with ceramic bezel and glide lock, this new model is to die for...

Sent from my R1 HD using Tapatalk
machob55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 08:19 AM   #7
sensui
2024 Pledge Member
 
sensui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,446
I think 14060 fits the bill here if you like classic proportions of a sub....if you don't care for extreme waterproof feature...I'd look at four digits too but you'd have to be more gingerly with them in certain scenarios....warranty is overblown...these things properly serviced/maintained are as rugged mechanical watches can get.
sensui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 08:28 AM   #8
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by j0oftheworld View Post
Wondering about input on a daily worn Sub.
I've always been a classics fan, truer to original size/shape, and there seems to be plenty out there in great condition.
Obvious advantages to the current Ref. the warranty and ceramic bezel.
So what piece would be best for daily wear and abuse from those who've put serious miles on each?
Thanks!
Consider the 116600 Sea Dweller which was retired from the Rolex line-up in March. The more traditional shape with the advantages of the newer technology.

__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2017, 08:55 AM   #9
joejoe1225
"TRF" Member
 
joejoe1225's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: USA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 1,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR View Post
Consider the 116600 Sea Dweller which was retired from the Rolex line-up in March. The more traditional shape with the advantages of the newer technology.



Perfect!!!!
__________________
joejoe1225 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 08:53 AM   #10
corn18
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Tom
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 284
I have owned them all (4,5,6 digit sub, DSSD) and I have now chosen the 126600 as my daily wearer. I like the larger size and the perfect proportions. Never liked the maxi case.
corn18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 08:57 AM   #11
nikesupremedunk
"TRF" Member
 
nikesupremedunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,227
The glide lock is nice but I don't use it as much as I thought I would. If your bracelet it sized correctly you don't really need it. But I would vote for the 6 digit ceramic as a daily. Love my ND.
__________________
| 116234 DJ36 | 116610LN SubC | 116520 Daytona | BlackBay 58 Blue |
nikesupremedunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 09:00 AM   #12
Kyle3130
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kyle3130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,960
I've worn my 14060M Sub daily for four and a half years including two deployments to the Middle East. I picked it because it is the most modern iteration of the original. It's lighter but just as durable as the current Sub. It even has the same movement (minus the new hairspring of course). I plan on wearing it daily until the day I take it off and hand it to my son so he can do the same.
__________________
Kyle3130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 10:14 AM   #13
Joemck
"TRF" Member
 
Joemck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Boston
Watch: And listen
Posts: 690
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle3130 View Post
I've worn my 14060M Sub daily for four and a half years including two deployments to the Middle East. I picked it because it is the most modern iteration of the original. It's lighter but just as durable as the current Sub. It even has the same movement (minus the new hairspring of course). I plan on wearing it daily until the day I take it off and hand it to my son so he can do the same.
Excellent plan! And thank you for your service.
__________________
" Now and then we had a hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to become pirates."
---- Mark Twain
Joemck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 10:12 AM   #14
cangelosijeff
"TRF" Member
 
cangelosijeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Jeff
Location: USA
Watch: LV
Posts: 395
5 digit date with glidelock for me.
cangelosijeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 10:12 AM   #15
Joemck
"TRF" Member
 
Joemck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Boston
Watch: And listen
Posts: 690
It’s a matter of personal preference. Some like the SD43- bigger size & great bracelet. Others the SD4000 -Wears slightly smaller than a sub but all the upgrades and a wrist tank if ever there was one. Others go for the 5 digit series - lighter. Myself I most prefer the subc. I have larger wrists but like the middle of the road weight. Then, of course, there is the date v. No date issue. If you can, try a few. Experience is often the only way of figuring out your best choice.
__________________
" Now and then we had a hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to become pirates."
---- Mark Twain
Joemck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 10:37 AM   #16
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
for daily use with some abuse, i think a 5d is best since parts are cheaper and the bezel insert is a simple DIY.

theres been plenty of threads on cracked bezels on 6d's of different ref#'s and its never a cheap fix.

i even had my dssd bezel replaced due to a manufacturing issue and if it wasn't warranty, i'm sure it would have been $1500 or so min.
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 12:04 PM   #17
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
I think this is a good choice and, personally, I think it's the ideal Sub.


__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 01:08 PM   #18
MJK737
"TRF" Member
 
MJK737's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: AZ
Watch: This, Hold my Beer
Posts: 369
What GradyPhilpott said. I've got the same 14060M and wear it everywhere. It's taken over my GMT Master's spot on my wrist and I wore that during a combat deployment in Afghanistan. I just feel the Sub is a little tougher (they are probably equal, but that's just me). Heck I've even wore my 14060M to Big Surf and rode all the slides and wave pool (yep the one off the 101). 14060M, wear it anywhere, just set it and forget it...
__________________
Regards:

MJK
MJK737 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 01:12 PM   #19
Sublovin
2024 Pledge Member
 
Sublovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 4,595
Most any should do the trick
Sublovin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 01:16 PM   #20
MBYSF
"TRF" Member
 
MBYSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: LA / HI
Watch: Rolex / Patek
Posts: 475
116610 brand new and you'll be set for life.
__________________
Spread Aloha,
-MB
MBYSF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 October 2017, 01:17 PM   #21
Spoonage
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,133
I have a SubC, Tudor Sub, and a BBN. I've put them all through their paces and all are still ticking away just as they were on Day one of ownership. Worn them in the field, on duty, in the water, during camping, hiking, etc. etc...
Spoonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2017, 05:12 AM   #22
j0oftheworld
"TRF" Member
 
j0oftheworld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Jason
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 269
I think 14060M will be a first choice with the excellent fallback of a 114060..
Thanks for your input guys! Tons of expertise on this site, love it!

PS; thank you for your service fellas! Any combat ready Rolex photos!? :)
j0oftheworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2017, 07:46 AM   #23
MJK737
"TRF" Member
 
MJK737's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: AZ
Watch: This, Hold my Beer
Posts: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by j0oftheworld View Post
I think 14060M will be a first choice with the excellent fallback of a 114060..
Thanks for your input guys! Tons of expertise on this site, love it!

PS; thank you for your service fellas! Any combat ready Rolex photos!? :)
Here you go, I'd post a pick but it's gotten too complicated, so here's a link...
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f23/rol...t43540143.html
__________________
Regards:

MJK
MJK737 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2017, 05:38 AM   #24
Kyle3130
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kyle3130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,960
Here is a thread from awhile back you might like. There is a pic of my sub while overseas in there.

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=525876
__________________
Kyle3130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2017, 05:53 AM   #25
j0oftheworld
"TRF" Member
 
j0oftheworld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Jason
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 269
Black Sub against desert camo colors = Pop! ;)
j0oftheworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2017, 06:06 AM   #26
Kyle3130
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kyle3130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,960
Agreed!
__________________
Kyle3130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2017, 08:54 AM   #27
Gerry62
"TRF" Member
 
Gerry62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy EU
Watch: Rolex Panerai
Posts: 7,505
from 2 years Sub 14060. Deepsea and Daytona occasionally
Gerry62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2017, 09:06 AM   #28
collarcity
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: New York
Watch: 16570, 14060M
Posts: 379
14060M. Classic aesthetics. Modern movement.

collarcity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2017, 09:08 AM   #29
The Libertine
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
14060M.

No need for a ceramic bezel when an aluminum one works just as well
No need for glidelock when the prior bracelet is easy to adjust, comfortable, and inexpensive to repair and/or replace. (Love the Rolex logo stamped into the steel.)
No need for a maxi-case, when one with lug holes is quintessentially classic.

Jason... you know what you want and where to pick one up!
The Libertine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2017, 09:21 AM   #30
sco
"TRF" Member
 
sco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
I went with the 116610 Submariner Date almost four years ago and it has been a great everyday piece.
sco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.