The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 January 2022, 08:45 PM   #31
Daveh777
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 221
Not sure I agree. The timing of contracts and exclusions may not align to the snaps of these people wearing Rolex.
Daveh777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2022, 10:43 PM   #32
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by kultschar View Post
I think what actually happened is that they made Daniel Craig personally an ambassador half way through his tenure as Bond rather then the Bond Character himself.

Any pic in the last 5 years with him on the street / events etc is all Omega. I have been trying to spot him with his Rolex now that he is officially not Bond but nothing yet.
Yea, that would be in line with him saying they gotta pay to play. Assuming it was same with Brosnan back in the day, when he was both Bond and an ambassador.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2022, 11:55 PM   #33
inadeje
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,895
Great theme for a thread OP.

A couple of points that may clarify what appears to be a conflict of interest.

Firstly, none of the photos provide dates. Therefore, are we suggesting that if a famous person ever wore a Rolex and there happens to be a photo then he/she is betraying the ambassador role? Let’s say that for instance Daniel Craig signed to be the Omega ambassador in Jan 2020 for a 2 year contract. If there were photos before that date (or after) wearing another brands watch, I don’t see the relevance.

Secondly, these brands use cunning. If a particular influencer/star is “known” to wear brand X, another brand looking to bring itself to the stature of the competing brand will particularly seek to sign ambassadorship with that person. You know, consumer mindset, “oh look, Daniel Craig now likes Omega more than Rolex, so Omega must be as good as Rolex”

Finally, these influencers/stars have agents and business managers, these managers seek to increase the annual revenue in order to obtain a cut. Their clients image is “sold” to the highest bidder, not the brand that Star X would personally purchase privately. So all this ambassadorship promotion is pretty much for the shallow minded folks out there who don’t understand that the reason star X is on those photos is for $$$$$ ONLY and when that contract ends, so too will the fake preference for the given brand.

My 2 cents
__________________
♛ 218206 Roman ♛ 116689 ♛ 126710BLRO ♛ 16520 white ♛ 16523 white ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1R-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Bronzo 671 & 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Cartier Santos XL - Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2022, 10:53 PM   #34
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,676
Quote:
Originally Posted by inadeje View Post
Great theme for a thread OP.

A couple of points that may clarify what appears to be a conflict of interest.

Firstly, none of the photos provide dates. Therefore, are we suggesting that if a famous person ever wore a Rolex and there happens to be a photo then he/she is betraying the ambassador role? Let’s say that for instance Daniel Craig signed to be the Omega ambassador in Jan 2020 for a 2 year contract. If there were photos before that date (or after) wearing another brands watch, I don’t see the relevance.

Secondly, these brands use cunning. If a particular influencer/star is “known” to wear brand X, another brand looking to bring itself to the stature of the competing brand will particularly seek to sign ambassadorship with that person. You know, consumer mindset, “oh look, Daniel Craig now likes Omega more than Rolex, so Omega must be as good as Rolex”

Finally, these influencers/stars have agents and business managers, these managers seek to increase the annual revenue in order to obtain a cut. Their clients image is “sold” to the highest bidder, not the brand that Star X would personally purchase privately. So all this ambassadorship promotion is pretty much for the shallow minded folks out there who don’t understand that the reason star X is on those photos is for $$$$$ ONLY and when that contract ends, so too will the fake preference for the given brand.

My 2 cents
Spot on.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2022, 10:56 PM   #35
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by JodyHighroller View Post
It’s funny, I was in the Omega boutique last year wearing my RG DD40 olive looking at the new Speedy in Sedna gold. The sales guy in an attempt to help convince me to purchase was like did you know Daniel Craig wears an Omega? I responded yes, but when he’s off camera he wears a Rolex. The look on his face was priceless.
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.