ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

petenyc · 25 January 2014, 11:40 PM

very nice like the date option congrats

dysondiver · 25 January 2014, 11:43 PM

seems reasonable to me ,,,

anothernewphone · 25 January 2014, 11:52 PM

I did the same thing, except with the ceramic models. I couldn't be happier.

I loved not having to mess with the date at the begining of each month, but I'll get over it.

RolexPete · 26 January 2014, 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cc1966

I would have done the same....Congrats.

x2

Mick8moses · 26 January 2014, 12:52 AM

I am certainly happy that you found the timepiece that is right for you. But I have to say that I love my classic two line 14060m and plan to have it forever. To me it optimizes feature for function. That said, if I needed a date complication I would trade it in for a GMT.

Racerdj · 26 January 2014, 12:53 AM

Congratulations!

Tudor66 · 26 January 2014, 01:03 AM

I agree with your choice. All of my rolex watches are date models. I won't leave home without a date, cyclops and oyster bracelet...!

s14roller · 26 January 2014, 01:06 AM

For me, it was not so much the date itself (honestly regardless if I'm wearing a Daytona or Sub, etc., there is an off chance of needing the date once max during the day) but more so bc I thought the 16610 date cyclops was more iconic.

Brenngun · 26 January 2014, 01:59 AM

Makes perfect sense to me. I refer to the date function at least 3 or 4 times a day. Can't live without it.

26 January 2014, 12:53 AM	#36
Racerdj 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Indianapolis Watch: Patek-Philippe Posts: 16,832	Congratulations! __________________ Rolex and Patek Philippe

26 January 2014, 01:03 AM	#37
Tudor66 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Al Location: California, USA Watch: GMT- Pepsi Posts: 3,462	I agree with your choice. All of my rolex watches are date models. I won't leave home without a date, cyclops and oyster bracelet...! __________________ -NAWCC Member

26 January 2014, 01:59 AM	#39
Brenngun 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Rick Location: Smokin' Heaven Watch: Rolex & Tudor Posts: 3,866	Makes perfect sense to me. I refer to the date function at least 3 or 4 times a day. Can't live without it. __________________ Simple solutions solve complexed problems more often than complexed solutions solve simple problems!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

25 January 2014, 11:40 PM	#31
petenyc "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: pete Location: NYC Watch: 116610LN Posts: 1,011	very nice like the date option congrats

25 January 2014, 11:43 PM	#32
dysondiver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: tom Location: northern ireland Watch: my fins Posts: 10,063	seems reasonable to me ,,,

25 January 2014, 11:52 PM	#33
anothernewphone Banned Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Bill Location: Plymouth Meeting Watch: 116520 Posts: 3,209	I did the same thing, except with the ceramic models. I couldn't be happier. I loved not having to mess with the date at the begining of each month, but I'll get over it.

26 January 2014, 12:52 AM	#35
Mick8moses Banned Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Mick Location: Atlanta Posts: 1,524	I am certainly happy that you found the timepiece that is right for you. But I have to say that I love my classic two line 14060m and plan to have it forever. To me it optimizes feature for function. That said, if I needed a date complication I would trade it in for a GMT.

26 January 2014, 01:06 AM	#38
s14roller "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: US Posts: 3,257	For me, it was not so much the date itself (honestly regardless if I'm wearing a Daytona or Sub, etc., there is an off chance of needing the date once max during the day) but more so bc I thought the 16610 date cyclops was more iconic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)