ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

SeamasterGMT · 28 April 2011, 04:04 AM

I've had the Deepsea on my wrist for the last five days and didn't once feel the need to go exploration diving.

pokpok · 28 April 2011, 04:18 AM

Tried on both also and as much as I want the DSSD, the SubC just felt and looked perfect on my wrist.

RangerMarc · 29 April 2011, 10:20 AM

Not to go off topic but I was recently debating between the SubC and the Deepsea myself for daily wear (leaning towards Deepsea) and ended up getting the Seadweller. I have smaller wrists so the Seadweller seems to be a great mid-point (in size) between the SubC and the Deepsea. No regrets at all on my choice. Other factor was that I wasn't a big fan of the cyclops.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

28 April 2011, 04:04 AM	#31
SeamasterGMT Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: USA Watch: DeepSea Posts: 822	I've had the Deepsea on my wrist for the last five days and didn't once feel the need to go exploration diving.

28 April 2011, 04:18 AM	#32
pokpok "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: SC Watch: 16600 Posts: 198	Tried on both also and as much as I want the DSSD, the SubC just felt and looked perfect on my wrist.

29 April 2011, 10:20 AM	#33
RangerMarc "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: Marc Location: OC,California Watch: SD 16600 Z Series Posts: 3	Not to go off topic but I was recently debating between the SubC and the Deepsea myself for daily wear (leaning towards Deepsea) and ended up getting the Seadweller. I have smaller wrists so the Seadweller seems to be a great mid-point (in size) between the SubC and the Deepsea. No regrets at all on my choice. Other factor was that I wasn't a big fan of the cyclops.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)