Would you rent a Rolex?

[Ihatecheese]

I'm sure there is a market if they can insure and have large enough deposits.

People rent jewellery for award shows etc. But normally more high end than these models. So why not.

[Harry-57]

The obvious answer is no. Another answer would be why? I don't have the kind of money that would allow me to pay for something that wasn't mine, effectively giving my money away. I can only afford what I own.

[GreatScott]

Originally Posted by Sandpit

Let’s face it, this is targeted at the insufferable Instagram crowd. You know, the type that rents a jet for an hour so they can do photo shoots but never leave the ground. The type that poses for photos in front of somebody else’s lambo.

Basically, it’s largely for people that can’t afford to buy. Those talking about using as a test before buying will be in the minority (I actually think it’s quite a good idea).

This is exactly right. This is for generation fake, where you don't have to earn it, you just have to fake it long enough to get a picture.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

[Aberdein]

I wouldn't rent as I buy watches new and keep them but I can see there being a market for such watches. People rent cars and change them every two or three years so why not watches.

[Rori]

Originally Posted by Drpepper

Seems to me that someone who wants to rent one might just buy a replica instead.

I was going to say that.
Both ideas however make no sense to me but if replicas business is thriving is because not everyone think as I think :-(


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SearChart]

Originally Posted by TswaneNguni

I would rather die

I agree.

[1William]

I would not.

[ROlesorusLEX]

I would hope they have an experienced watchmaker on staff, otherwise half their watches will return with superfake movements or other "new" bits. . .

[THC]

Blasphemy

[brandrea]

I’ll be that guy and say yes ...

I’d have to see how the math works out, but with an option to buy I see this as a way to try out models that I’d be interested in purchasing without committing to buy.

I can see it being beneficial especially with PM references again, provided the overall cost isn’t too much to “rent”.

[Yess]

I think renting to try it out seems like a good idea!

[RXAPPP]

Nope - never

[macrowatch]

Before a knee jerk no reaction, I think it would depend on cost and if there's a 'wait list'?

Tongue in cheek, if I could rent a Daytona for $50 per month with no wait, why not?

More seriously, if it allowed me to try on a watch for a month, even if it cost me $500 a month, I'd rather do that then have to pick watches sight unseen allowing me to go through all the hot watches and PM watches to really know how much I like everything. To that note, I'm incredibly grateful for amazing friends who will let me borrow their watches lightly for a few weeks at a time to help me decide what gets added next to the collection.

[kodak]

A hell no.

[lemaitre]

I wouldn’t do it. But I think it might help undecided people, they could rent and wear the watch they intend to buy to see if they really like it.

[fsprow]

I would not, but it certainly beats spending $10,000 on a watch that you quickly determine does not work for you.

[pickettt]

Do the scratches get deducted from my security deposit?

[NachoNeal]

My answer is 'no way'.
However I will say that borrowing a friend's new sub for a week really helped me figure out and clarify a few issues.

[schoolboy]

Originally Posted by shaunylw

That makes sense to me. Or a Daytona if you are worried about how legible it might be. I can see a lot of Instagram influencers doing this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yup.

Now renting it to pretend it’s yours, that’s a different story lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ROLEX MAN]

rather go naked! (on my wrist)

[Xenon]

Good idea as judged by the many posts regarding buyer's remorse like the watch is too big, or the watch is too small, or I prefer the other bezel, or I can't see the dials, or I can't bond with the watch, or the lugs are too wide, or the color is too boring, or it's too blingy, or it's uncomfortable, or is this watch the best investment, etc...

[nocaps]

here's your answer

poseur:
a person who attempts to impress others by assuming or affecting a manner, degree of elegance, sentiment, etc., other than his or her true one

[GradyPhilpott]

Originally Posted by Yess

Would you rent a Rolex?

[Calatrava r]

Originally Posted by 77T

How would renting differ from the many who put it on credit card, then pay monthly for it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

The cost is probably cheaper to rent over interest and principal on a credit card for one but the primary difference is an owner has the title and can dispose of the property anytime at will, whereas, renting leaves the title in the owner lessor and the watch can only be returned to them or disposed of at their direction. No upside to renting unless the rent is crazy cheap which I doubt it is on jewelry.

[Piguette]

No

[Rori]

Originally Posted by ROlesorusLEX

I would hope they have an experienced watchmaker on staff, otherwise half their watches will return with superfake movements or other "new" bits. . .

True
Or maybe they are renting Superfakes already.

[moneymike83]

Lol and no!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[danyvw]

No, never!

[pickettt]

Originally Posted by nocaps

here's your answer

poseur:
a person who attempts to impress others by assuming or affecting a manner, degree of elegance, sentiment, etc., other than his or her true one

Leasing a car?

[bp1000]

Capitalism at its best

Oh wait... I shouldn’t complain.