The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 April 2016, 11:11 AM   #31
Bfd70
"TRF" Member
 
Bfd70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 893
214270
116610
<7" wrists
214270 definitely wears smaller. I suspect it is due to the clasp size.




Bfd70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2016, 05:24 AM   #32
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
214270 or 114270. The extra large sub crown always bothered my wrist. 214270 is supremely comfortable. You'll forget it's even on wrist.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2016, 06:54 AM   #33
Engi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by fskywalker View Post
214270 is 47.3mm while 114270 is 44mm
Thanks !
Engi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2016, 08:35 AM   #34
Ruud Van Driver
"TRF" Member
 
Ruud Van Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,926
I can't wrap my head around you losing a lot of money on a Sub C. Was it damaged?
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737

"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott
Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Ruud Van Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2016, 04:40 PM   #35
RG1825
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: London
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruud Van Driver View Post
I can't wrap my head around you losing a lot of money on a Sub C. Was it damaged?


No, just as in I bought it new from an AD and sold it SH. So not a lot but more than if I had bought it off the forum
RG1825 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2017, 02:17 AM   #36
Mattldm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: So Cal
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruud Van Driver View Post
I can't wrap my head around you losing a lot of money on a Sub C. Was it damaged?
It's pretty simple really.
Example: A brand new 114060 at an AD $7500 msrp, most states you add sales tax, about 8% here in CA, so now you are looking at $8100ish out the door. The going rate for these on the forums is somewhere in the $6-7 range. So you have lost $1-2K. To most people that would be a lot of money.
Mattldm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2017, 02:28 AM   #37
Mattldm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: So Cal
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruud Van Driver View Post
I can't wrap my head around you losing a lot of money on a Sub C. Was it damaged?
It's pretty simple really.
Example: A brand new 114060 at an AD $7500 msrp, most states you add sales tax, about 8% here in CA, so now you are looking at $8100ish out the door. The going rate for these on the forums is somewhere in the $6-7 range. So you have lost $1-2K. To most people that would be a lot of money.
Mattldm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2019, 01:34 PM   #38
axelbrass
"TRF" Member
 
axelbrass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Toronto
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by fskywalker View Post

The 77200 bracelet (easylink) from the Explorer 214270 will not fit the 114270 as the lug hole positions are different, but you could put an easylink clasp assembly on an 114270 explorer (I tried that; below easylink clasp assembly from 214270 on 114270 on left, regular clasp from 114270 on 214270 on center, glydelock on 16610 sub on right)

Here the 77200 easylink clasp on my 114270 explorer:


Francisco
Hi Francisco, just want to confirm as I want to do the same.

You bought a 114270 Watch + Bracelet and then got a 77200 Clasp (with EasyLink) and fit it into the 114270 Bracelet?

This lets you wear the 36mm Explorer yet get the benefit of the EasyLink feature?
axelbrass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2019, 01:38 PM   #39
Finslayer83
"TRF" Member
 
Finslayer83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
214270 smokes it.

Much better than the. 114060 I had - the Explorer is the only 6 digit I like, prefer 5 digit Sub/GMT
Finslayer83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2019, 01:45 PM   #40
Finslayer83
"TRF" Member
 
Finslayer83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattldm View Post
It's pretty simple really.
Example: A brand new 114060 at an AD $7500 msrp, most states you add sales tax, about 8% here in CA, so now you are looking at $8100ish out the door. The going rate for these on the forums is somewhere in the $6-7 range. So you have lost $1-2K. To most people that would be a lot of money.
Show me a 6-7k range 114060 please.
Finslayer83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2019, 01:55 PM   #41
BrazenC5
2024 Pledge Member
 
BrazenC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: 1665,1675,1680,SD4
Posts: 1,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattldm View Post
It's pretty simple really.

Example: A brand new 114060 at an AD $7500 msrp, most states you add sales tax, about 8% here in CA, so now you are looking at $8100ish out the door. The going rate for these on the forums is somewhere in the $6-7 range. So you have lost $1-2K. To most people that would be a lot of money.
OP sold a Subc Date. 116610...second hand retail is over msrp.

I'm suspecting OP sold SH to a dealer...would've done better selling as private party.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
BrazenC5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2019, 04:11 PM   #42
CasinoRoyale_007
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NYC/Toronto/CLT
Watch: LF Sport & Tissot
Posts: 182
How about a 116000 Blue 3 6 9? You can even substitute in explorer hands to make it effectively a blue 36mm explorer with updated bracelet :)
CasinoRoyale_007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2019, 07:30 PM   #43
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by axelbrass View Post
Hi Francisco, just want to confirm as I want to do the same.



You bought a 114270 Watch + Bracelet and then got a 77200 Clasp (with EasyLink) and fit it into the 114270 Bracelet?



This lets you wear the 36mm Explorer yet get the benefit of the EasyLink feature?


Yes, that can be done if you can source the easylink clasp assembly. In my case did the test as had at the same time the 114270 and 214270, but did not ended up keeping the easylink clasp on the 114270 as swap it back before selling the 214270.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001
Zenith 02.480.405

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2019, 08:18 PM   #44
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finslayer83 View Post
Show me a 6-7k range 114060 please.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrazenC5 View Post
OP sold a Subc Date. 116610...second hand retail is over msrp.

I'm suspecting OP sold SH to a dealer...would've done better selling as private party.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Gentlemen - this is a thread from 2016
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2019, 09:13 PM   #45
Finslayer83
"TRF" Member
 
Finslayer83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devildog View Post
Gentlemen - this is a thread from 2016
Ha! didn't even see that.

Finslayer83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2019, 04:24 AM   #46
robbyrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 203
sub explorer

I wore a 16610 for 10 years on my 7.5” wrists and traded it
for a 214270 Mk2. Even with fairly good size wrists I still notice the difference in
daily wear over two years later.
I agree a 114270 would fit better on 6” wrist.
The new bracelets are great but I don’t think the old
SEL link oyster is as bad as some people feel.
The small clasp on the 114270 I would guess is much
less noticeable than the new clasps on 214270.
My 214270 has mostly ruined my desire for other watches and I
am/was a long time sufferer of the watch obsession.
robbyrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.