|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: In favor of a Royal Oak 39mm? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
61 | 83.56% |
| No |
  
|
12 | 16.44% |
| Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
3 November 2019, 04:02 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 161
|
Royal Oak 39mm
Anyone here is favor of the return of a Royal Oak in 39mm with an in house caliber like the 4302 (of the 15500) or the 3120 (of the 15450/15400)?
The jumbo is a great watch but it has a historical movement not a modern sport's watch movement so less shock resistant and does not have a screw down crown. Hence, a lot favor the now discontinued 15300 for an every day Royal Oak. |
|
|
|
3 November 2019, 05:25 AM
|
#2 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta
Watch: No Rolex
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
Nah, I think they’ve got those bases covered. As you say, the 15300 can be found for those not satisfied with the other RO offerings. |
|
|
|
|
|
3 November 2019, 06:41 AM
|
#3 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
A quickset date and a seconds hand are things alot of owners would like, PP have updated the Nautilus to having hacking so little changes could be possible but not sure if FHB are listening any more.
|
|
|
|
|
3 November 2019, 06:59 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Real Name: Mark
Location: Europe
Posts: 644
|
39mm is the perfect size for the RO. Would be great to have a new 15300.
|
|
|
|
|
3 November 2019, 08:08 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: uk
Posts: 992
|
An updated version of the 15300, why not.
But never touch the 15202... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
3 November 2019, 01:51 PM
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,052
|
As a 15300st owner I enjoy the current exclusivity of having the best version of the Royal Oak so I’m good with the current sizing options
|
|
|
|
|
3 November 2019, 02:18 PM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Asia
Posts: 409
|
definitely +1
the 41s are out of proportion and too big! |
|
|
|
|
3 November 2019, 06:50 PM
|
#8 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Michael
Location: Near beach
Watch: PB1967
Posts: 8,165
|
I think 38mm will be even better.
|
|
|
|
3 November 2019, 11:59 PM
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Florida, USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/Vin Omega
Posts: 1,972
|
I love my 15500!
|
|
|
|
|
4 November 2019, 12:21 AM
|
#10 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 161
|
Quote:
 Also enjoying my 15300
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 November 2019, 12:25 AM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
As much as I love my Jumbo, setting the date is a PITA. Will welcome an upgrade to a quick set date.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789
|
|
|
|
|
4 November 2019, 01:34 AM
|
#12 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 161
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
